Skip Navigation

Chemical Senses 2005 30(Supplement 1):i279-i280; doi:10.1093/chemse/bjh223
This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Liscia, A.
Right arrow Articles by Crnjar, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Liscia, A.
Right arrow Articles by Crnjar, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Chemical Senses Vol. 30 No. suppl 1 © Oxford University Press 2005; all rights reserved

Taste Modulators are Tools to Gain a Better Insight into Specific Sensitivity of Chemoreceptors in Blowflies

Anna Liscia, Paolo Solari, Carla Masala, Giorgia Sollai and Roberto Crnjar

Department of Experimental Biology, Section of General Physiology, University of Cagliari, Cittadella Universitaria di Monserrato, SS. 554 Km 4.500, I-09042 Monserrato (CA), Italy

Correspondence to be sent to: Anna Liscia, e-mail: Liscia{at}unica.it

Key words: blowfly, electrophysiology, Na-cyclamate, sugar, sweet, taste, taste modulators


    Introduction
 Top
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
One of the questions arising in studying taste transduction is whether natural sweets are distinguished from sweeteners as the former are the major source of metabolic energy. Blowflies are a convenient preparation to study chemoreception, given their relatively simplicity, availability and the vast body of related work published. The labellar chemosensory system of blowflies consists of sensilla housing four chemoreceptive neurons, named ‘salt’, ‘sugar’, ‘water’ and ‘deterrent’ cells after their best recognized stimuli. While spike activity from these sensory neurons is readily recordable, dendrite membranes remain difficult to access (Murakami and Kijima, 2000Go), making the mechanism(s) of transduction little understood at the membrane level. However, information can be obtained by studying the effects on the spike activity of specific pharmacological modulators used in association with chemical stimuli.

The sugar receptor cell is capable of detecting a broad variety of substances, such as pyranose or furanose sugars, as well as amino acids and proteins. On the other hand, Ahamed et al. (2001Go) found that the sweetener glycyrrhizin activates the ‘pyranose site’ of the ‘sugar’ cell membrane in Phormia regina, while Na-saccharine stimulates the ‘deterrent cell’ in Protophormia terraenovae (Liscia et al., 2004Go).

Calcium ions appear to be in many ways involved in the transduction mechanisms of various tastants. We therefore decided to investigate the role of calcium in the chemoreception mechanism(s) of sugars and sweeteners. In the present study we have specifically investigated the reception mechanism of a natural pyranose sugar (sucrose) and a commonly used sweetener for humans (Na-cyclamate) by addressing such issues as the involvement of Ca2+ cascade and/or of Ca2+ channels in the sugar transduction mechanism.


    Materials and methods
 Top
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The spike activity from the chemosensory cells was recorded by means of the tip-recording technique (Hodgson et al., 1955Go) in labellar chemosensilla of Protophormia terraenovae. The electrophysiological recordings were pass-band filtered (10–1000 Hz), digitized through a Metrabyte DAS-16 A/D converter (10 000 points/s) and stored on disk for computer analysis. Spikes in the discharges were sorted out by means of the S.A.P.I.D. Tools software (Smith et al., 1990Go). Spike analysis was applied to the first second of the discharges skipping the first 30 ms from the onset of stimulation.

Taste stimuli

Concentrations of 1–100 mM Na-cyclamate were used in the dose–response relationship, while 200 mM sucrose and 50 mM Na-cyclamate were applied alone or added with the following modulators.

Modulators

The following compounds were added to the stimulating solutions: amiloride (inhibitor of the ENaC superfamily of ion channels); W-7 (calmodulin antagonist and inhibitor of Na-activated cation channels); EGTA (Ca2+ chelator); Mibefradil (blocker of the Ca2+ T-type channel); SK&F-96365 (inhibitor of receptor mediated Ca2+ influx).

All stimuli were administered in a blind sequence at the concentration of 0.1 mM except for EGTA (1 mM).

Statistical analysis

Significant differences were calculated by means of Student’s t-test (Statistical software package) with a 95% confidence level.


    Results
 Top
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Mean spike firing frequency values ± SE recorded from labellar chemosensilla in response to 1–100 mM Na-cyclamate are shown in Figure 1. A clear dose-response is seen for the ‘sugar’ cell and an inverse correlation for the ‘water’ cell. Since at the highest concentration tested (100 mM) the response of the ‘salt’ cell was relatively high, 50 mM was adopted as the test concentration to further study the stimulating effect of Na-cyclamate on the ‘sugar’ cell.



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 Dose–response relationship following stimulation with 1, 10, 20, 50 and 100 mM Na-cyclamate of the labellar taste chemosensilla of P. terraenovae. Spike firing frequency mean values of the ‘salt’, ‘sugar’ and ‘water ‘ cell within the first second of the discharges ± SE (vertical bars). Number of sensilla tested: 80–98.

 
Figure 2A shows that both amiloride and EGTA decrease the response to Na-cyclamate but not to sucrose; in contrast, W-7 decreases the response to sucrose but not to Na-cyclamate. Mibefradil decreases the responses to both stimuli, particularly affecting the tonic portion of the discharge (200–1000 ms; Figure 2B). SK&F-96365 inhibits the stimulating effectiveness of both sucrose and Na-cyclamate.



View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2 Normalized spikes frequencies ± SE (vertical bars) from the ‘sugar’ cell following addition to 200 mM sucrose or 50 mM Na-cyclamate of (A) amiloride (0.1 mM), W-7 (0.1 mM), EGTA (1 mM), Mibefradil (0.1 mM) and SK&F-96365 (0.1 mM) in the labellar taste chemosensilla of P. terraenovae. Broken line is the spike frequency value in response to pure sucrose or Na-cyclamate set = 100%. Number of sensilla tested: 70–90. Asterisks indicate significant differences (P ≤ 0.05) with respect to pure compounds. (B) Time course (spikes/100 ms intervals) of the ‘sugar’ cell in response to sucrose and sucrose + mibefradil.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Our results show that Na-cyclamate predominantly stimulates the same sensory cell (‘sugar’) as sucrose. However, evidence is provided that the two stimuli act through different transduction mechanisms: in fact, differences in spike firing frequency were found between sucrose and Na-cyclamate, when various pharmacological modulators were added to these stimuli in the test solution. The response to Na-cyclamate seems to be largely mediated by an Na+ influx across amiloride-sensitive channels (ENaC) and, to a lesser extent, by an amiloride-insensitive component (AIC) which could account for the relative sensitivity to EGTA, Mibefradil and SK&F-96365, thus implying the involvement of Ca2+ in the transduction mechanism.

Instead, the sucrose response is amiloride insensitive, as previously reported (Liscia et al., 1997Go), but is inhibited by W-7 (Liscia et al., 2002Go), thus suggesting a different pathway. A Na+-activated cation channel could be in fact opened by an early Na+ influx through sugar-activated ionotrophic channels such as those described by Murakami and Kijima (2000Go) in the fleshfly. W-7 interacts either from the outside of the membrane and/or from the inside by inhibiting Ca2+-modulated cascades (Laver et al., 1997Go; Zhainanarov et al., 1998Go). Ion influx would mainly be made of Na+ and Ca2+, both of which reinforce channel activation, thus sustaining spread of depolarization.

Similar Na+-activated W-7-inhibited cation channels have been reported in the antennal olfactory dendrites of lobsters (Zhainanarov et al., 1998Go, 2001). Mibefradil strongly reduced the tonic portion of the discharge (200–1000 ms; Figure 2B), and this suggests an effect on the Na+-activated cation channel but no influence on the early Na+ current entering via the ionotrophic channel.

In conclusion, we found that sucrose and Na-cyclamate activate separate transduction pathways on the same chemosensory ‘sugar’ cell in the labellar sensilla of the blowfly P. terraenovae. Besides, the different effects exerted by the various modulators tested point to an involvement of Ca2+ in the transduction mechanism of both sucrose and Na-cyclamate.


    References
 Top
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Ahamed, A., Tsutumi, S., Ozaki, M. and Amakawa, T. (2001) An artificial sweetener stimulates the sweet taste in insect: dual effects of glycyrrhizin in Phormia regina. Chem. Senses, 26, 507–515.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Hodgson, E.S., Lettvin, J.Y. and Roeder, K.D. (1955) Physiology of primary chemoreceptor unit. Science, 122, 417–418.[Free Full Text]

Laver, D.R., Cherry C.A. and Walker N.A. (1997) The action of calmodulin antagonist W-7 and TFP and of calcium on the gating kinetics of the calcium activated large conductance potassium channel of the chara protoplasmic drop: a substate –sensitive analysis. J. Membr. Biol., 26, 263–274.

Liscia, A., Solari, P., Majone, R., Tomassini Barbarossa, I. and Crnjar, R. (1997) Taste reception mechanism in the blowfly: evidence of amiloride-sensitive and insensitive recepror sites. Physiol. Behav., 62, 875–879.[CrossRef][Medline]

Liscia, A., Crnjar, R., Masala, C., Sollai, G. and Solari, P. (2002) Sugar reception in the blowfly: a possible Ca++ involvement. J. Insect Physiol., 48, 693–699.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Liscia, A., Crnjar, R., Masala, C., Sollai, G. and Solari, P. (2004) Saccharin stimulates the ‘deterrent’ cell in the blowfly: behavioral aqnd electrophysiological evidence. Physiol. Behav. , 80, 647–646.[CrossRef][Medline]

Murakami, M. and Kijima, H. (2000) Trasduction ion channels directly gated by sugars on the insects ion channel. J. Gen. Physiol., 115, 455–466.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Smith, J.J.B.., Mitchell, B.K., Rolseth, B.M., Whitehead, A.T. and Albert, P.J. (1990) SAPID tools: microcomputer programs for analysis of multi-unit nerve recordings. Chem. Senses, 13, 253–270.

Zhainanarov, A., Doolin, R., Herlihy J-D. and Ache, B.W. (1998) Sodium-gated cation channel implicated in the activation of lobster olfactory receptor neurons. J. Neurophysiol., 79, 1349–1359.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Zhainanarov, A., Doolin, R., Herlihy J-D. and Ache, B.W. (2001) Odor-stimulated phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase in lobster olfactory receptor cells. J. Neurophysiol., 85, 2537–2544[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Chem SensesHome page
B. Gordesky-Gold, N. Rivers, O. M. Ahmed, and P. A.S. Breslin
Drosophila melanogaster Prefers Compounds Perceived Sweet by Humans
Chem Senses, March 1, 2008; 33(3): 301 - 309.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Liscia, A.
Right arrow Articles by Crnjar, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Liscia, A.
Right arrow Articles by Crnjar, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?