Chemical Senses Vol. 30 No. suppl 1 © Oxford University
Press 2005; all rights reserved
Factors Contributing to Individual Differences in Sucrose Preference
Monell Chemical Senses Center, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
Correspondence to be sent to: M. Yanina Pepino, e-mail: ypepino{at}monell.org
Key words: development, preference, race/ethnicity, sweet taste
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Although heightened throughout childhood and adolescence, sweet taste preference declines during late adolescence (Desor et al., 1977
| Materials and methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Subjects
We tested 62 children and 55 mothers of African-American, non-Hispanic descent and 66
children and 56 mothers of non-Hispanic, European descent, hereafter referred to as Black
and White, respectively. Included in this sample were 17 sibling pairs. The children
ranged in age from 6 to 10 years (mean = 7.8 ± 0.1 years) and the mothers
were, on average, 36.0 ± 0.6 years. Each childs race/ethnicity was defined
by mothers report of the racial background of both herself and the biological
father, according to standard US Census categories. All children and parents were
racially concordant. We use the term race/ethnicity herein when describing our groups
because it best represents both the genetic and cultural components of the sample
(Sankar and Cho, 2002
). All testing
procedures were approved by the Office of Regulatory Affairs at the University of
Pennsylvania and informed consent was obtained from each mother and assent from each
child 7 years of age or older.
Procedures
Children and their mothers were individually tested with identical procedures to allow
for comparisons. A forced-choice, paired comparison, tracking technique which avoids
response bias was used to assess sucrose preferences (Cowart and Beauchamp, 1990
). In brief, subjects were
presented with pairs of solutions differing in sucrose concentration (0.09, 0.18, 0.35,
0.70 and 1.05M). They were asked to taste the solutions without swallowing and point to
which of the pair they liked better. Each subsequent pair was then determined by the
subjects preceding preference choice. The entire task was then repeated with
stimulus pairs presented in reverse order. The most preferred solution for each subject
was the geometric mean of the sucrose concentrations chosen during the two trials.
Demographics, anthropometry and experience with sugar water
Mothers were queried about several socio-demographic variables and all but 20 answered questions regarding the practice of feeding sweetened water to their children when they were infants. From these latter data, two groups were formed: those who were frequently fed sweetened water and those who were never or rarely (<10 times) fed sweetened water. Children were weighed and measured for height (Detecto Model 439, Physician Scale; Webb City, MO) and body mass index (BMI, kg/m2) was computed.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Demographics and anthropometry
Black mothers were significantly younger (33.6 ± 0.8 versus 38.4 ± 0.7 years) and more likely to be single (71% versus 2%), with lower household incomes and fewer years of education (13.4 ± 0.2 versus 14.8 ± 0.3 years) when compared to White mothers (all Ps < 0.001). There were significant effects of race/ethnicity on childrens age (P < 0.025); Black children were older (8.1 ± 0.2 years) than White children (7.4 ± 0.1 years). No statistical differences were observed between the two groups in the childrens BMI categories, however. Despite the various demographic and age differences between the two racial/ethnic groups, further analyses revealed that none of these measured demographic factors were significantly related to the level of sucrose preferred by either children or adults.
Sweet preferences and practice of feeding sugar water
As a group, children preferred significantly higher concentrations of sucrose than
mothers [t(237 df) = 4.07, P < 0.0001]. Black
children (P < 0.001) and mothers (P < 0.001) preferred
significantly higher concentrations of sucrose than White children and mothers,
respectively (see Figure
1). Although 38% of the Black
children were routinely fed sugar water as babies, this custom was experienced by only
6% of the White children [
2(df = 1) = 16.50,
P < 0.0001]. However, regardless of race/ethinicity, early exposure to
sugar water was related to the level of sucrose preferred during childhood
[t(106 df) = 2.20; P = 0.03]. Children who were
routinely fed sugar water during infancy preferred significantly higher levels of sucrose
(0.66 ± 0.07 M) when compared to those who were rarely or minimally exposed (0.48
± 0.04 M).
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Consistent with previous findings in infants (Beauchamp and Moran, 1982
First, demographic factors, such as income, can play a role in food availability
(Drewnowski, 2003
). Although the
present study revealed significant socioeconomic differences between Black and White
mothers, these differences were not related to the level of sucrose preferred by children
or adults (see also
Desor et al., 1977
).
However, we acknowledge that economic factors may contribute to consumer food choices
since sugars, as well as fats, constitute one of the most palatable and low-priced
nutrients (Drewnowski, 2003
).
Secondly, experiential influences may contribute to ethnic differences in sweet
preferences. The practice of feeding sugar water to infants, more evident in Black
mothers, resulted in heightened sweet preferences during the second year of life
(Beauchamp and Moran, 1984
) and in
children aged 610 years (present study). Likewise, the greater desire and liking
for intensely sweet tasting foods and beverages in both young and elderly
African-Americans (Schiffman et al.,
2000
) may play a role in differential exposure and ingestion to sweet tasting
foods. Through familiarization, children develop a sense of what should, or should not,
taste sweet (Beauchamp and Cowart,
1985
).
Thirdly, the heightened preferences for sweets may be related to the physiological
and analgesic properties of sugars (Blass and
Hoffmeyer, 1991
;
Barr et al., 1994
). Of
interest is the recent finding that African-Americans experienced significantly higher
levels of stress compared to non-Hispanic Whites (Turner and Avison, 2003
). Higher levels of stress are
associated with great desire for sweet tastes among young Black adults when compared to
similarly aged White adults (Schiffman et
al., 2000
;
Dallman et al., 2003
).
Whether African-Americans are more sensitive to the physiological effects of sweet tastes
or are more likely to eat sweets to cope with stress is not yet known. Similarly, genetic
variation may contribute to differences in sweet taste perception and preference
(McDaniel and Reed, 2004
) as well as
differences in the brain mechanisms that underlie the rewarding and analgesic properties
of sweet tastes.
Consistent with previous research (Desor
et al., 1977
;
Desor and Beauchamp, 1987
), children
as a group preferred significantly higher levels of sucrose than adults. The study of the
analgesic properties of sweet tastes and sweet taste preferences across the life span,
and how it is affected by cultural practices, race/ethnicity and genetics is a research
area that needs to be fully explored.
| Acknowledgements |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This work was supported by grant NIH AA09523 and Monell Institutional Funds.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Bacon, A.W., Miles, S.J. and Schiffman, S.S. (1994) Effect of race on perception of fat alone and in combination with sugar. Physiol. Behav., 55, 603606.[CrossRef][Medline]
Barr, R.G., Quek, V.S., Cousineau, D., Oberlander, T.F., Brian, J.A. and Young, S.N. (1994) Effects of intra-oral sucrose on crying, mouthing and handmouth contact in newborn and six-week-old infants. Dev. Med. Child Neurol., 36, 608618.[ISI][Medline]
Bartoshuk, L.M. (2000) Comparing sensory experiences across individuals: recent psychophysical advances illuminate genetic variation in taste perception. Chem. Senses, 25, 447460.
Beauchamp, G.K. and Cowart, B.J. (1985) Congenital and experiential factors in the development of human flavor preferences. Appetite, 6, 357372.[ISI][Medline]
Beauchamp, G.K. and Moran, M.M. (1982) Dietary experience and sweet taste preference in human infants. Appetite, 3, 139152.[ISI][Medline]
Beauchamp, G.K. and Moran, M.M. (1984) Acceptance of sweet and salty tastes in 2-year-old children. Appetite, 5, 291305.[ISI][Medline]
Blass, E.M. and Hoffmeyer L.B. (1991) Sucrose as an analgesic for newborn infants. Pediatrics, 87, 215218.
Cowart, B.J. and Beauchamp, G.K. (1990) Early development of taste perception. In McBride, R. and MacFie, H. (eds), Psychological Basis of Sensory Evaluation. Elsevier, London, pp. 117.
Dallman, M.F., Pecoraro, N., Akana, S.F., La Fleur, S.E., Gomez, F., Houshyar, H., Bell, M.E., Bhatnagar, S., Laugero, K.D. and Manalo, S. (2003) Chronic stress and obesity: a new view of comfort food . Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 100, 16961701.
Desor, J.A. and Beauchamp, G.K. (1987) Longitudinal changes in sweet preferences in humans. Physiol. Behav., 39, 639641.[CrossRef][Medline]
Desor, J.A., Maller, O. and Greene, L.S. (1977) Preference for sweet in humans: infants, children and adults. In Weiffenbach, J.M. (ed.), Taste and Development: The Genesis of Sweet Preference. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, pp. 161173.
Drewnowski, A. (2003) Fat and sugar: An economic analysis. J. Nutr., 133, 838S840S.
McDaniel, A.H. and Reed, D.R. (2004) The human sweet tooth and its relationship to obesity. In Moustaid-Moussa, N. and Berdanier, C. (eds), Genomics and Proteomics in Nutrition. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp. 4967.
Sankar, P. and Cho, M.K. (2002) Genetics. Toward a new vocabulary of human genetic variation. Science, 298, 13371338.
Schiffman, S.S., Graham, B.G., Sattely-Miller, E.A. and Peterson-Dancy, M. (2000) Elevated and sustained desire for sweet taste in African-Americans: a potential factor in the development of obesity. Nutrition, 16, 886893.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Turner, R.J. and Avison, W.R. (2003) Status variations in stress exposure: implications for the interpretation of research on race, socioeconomic status, and gender. J. Health Soc. Behav., 44, 488505.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
