Chemical Senses Vol. 30 No. suppl 1 © Oxford University
Press 2005; all rights reserved
Signal Transduction of Umami Taste: Insights from Knockout Mice
1 Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, the Mount Sinai School of Medicine, 1 Gustave L. Levy Place, New York, NY 10029, USA 2 Howard Hughes Medical Institute, the Mount Sinai School of Medicine, 1 Gustave L. Levy Place, New York, NY 10029, USA, 3 Section of Oral Neuroscience, Kyushu University, 3-1-1 Maidashi, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka 812-8582, Japan and 4 Nestlé Research Center, Vers-Chez-les-Blanc, CH-1000 Lausanne, Switzerland
Correspondence to be sent to: Sami Damak, e-mail: sami.damak{at}rdls.nestle.com
Key words: umami, taste, transgenic mice, nerve recordings, Trpm5, T1r3, gustducin, transducin
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The sense of taste is comprised of four basic qualities: sweet, bitter, salty and sour. Umami, a Japanese term for delicious, although controversial for many years as a distinct taste is now widely accepted as a fifth taste quality. Compounds that taste umami include glutamate salts such as monosodium and monopotassium glutamate (MSG and MPG, respectively), nucleotide monophosphate (IMP, GMP), certain peptides and amino acids such as aspartate. A particular property of umami is that the taste of glutamate is enhanced by monophosphate nucleotides. Psychophysical studies and conditioned taste aversion experiments showed that humans and mice distinguish the taste of MSG from the four basic taste qualities. The umami taste may have evolved to help animals ingest food that have high protein content and is of significant importance to the food industry because of its flavor enhancement properties.
Taste signals are transduced primarily via GPCR pathways for sweet and bitter, and
ion channels for salty and sour. Several taste signal transduction proteins have recently
been discovered, including the T2rs, a family of bitter-responsive receptors, the T1rs
which form heterodimeric sweet- and amino-acid-responsive receptors,
-gustducin a
G protein
-subunit that couples these receptors to second messenger pathways,
G
13 the
subunit of gustducin, PLCß2, Trpm5 a calcium activated cation
channel, ENaC and ASIC two ion channels implicated in salty and sour taste, respectively
(reviewed in
Gilbertson et al., 2000
;
Lindemann, 2001
).
We set out to determine if these taste signal transduction proteins contribute to the response to umami compounds. Using knockout mice, behavioral assays, electrophysiological measurements and biochemical tools, we identified several components of the umami signaling pathways.
-Gustducin mediates responses to umami, in addition to sweet and bitter compounds
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
The role of
-gustducin in the transduction of sweet and bitter tastes is well
established (Wong et al.,
1996
-gustducin is also involved in umami taste, we
tested
-gustducin knockout (KO) mice with MSG, MPG and IMP. Two-bottle preference
tests and chorda tympani (CT) and glossopharyngeal (NG) nerve recordings showed that
these mice had diminished response to these umami compounds (Ruiz et al., 2003
-gustducin plays a role in the umami taste response.
Rod -transducin mediates responses to umami, but not to bitter or sweet compounds
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
Rod
-transducin is structurally and biochemically highly similar to
-gustducin and is also expressed in taste receptor cells, albeit at a much lower
level than is
-gustducin. To determine the role of
-transducin in taste, we
compared the responses to tastants of
-gustducin/
-transducin double KO,
single KO and WT mice. Two-bottle preference tests showed no difference in the response
to MSG (+10 µM amiloride, to reduce the effect of the sodium ion) between
-transducin KO mice and WT controls. The
-gustducin KO mice showed a
diminished preference for concentrations of MSG between 10 and 300 mM, whereas the double
KO mice were indifferent to those concentrations. Thus,
-transducin plays a role
in the response of mice to MSG but is less important than
-gustducin because the
effect of knocking out
-transducin on the MSG response is detectable only in the
absence of
-gustducin. Similar results were obtained with nerve recordings from
the CT nerve. Knocking out
-transducin, in the presence or absence of
-gustducin, did not affect the responses of mice to sweet, bitter, salty or sour
compounds (He et al.,
2004
-Gustducin, but not rod -transducin, mediates the responses to IMP and IMP enhancement of MSG
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
A particular characteristic of umami is that the taste response to MSG is enhanced by IMP, a compound that also tastes umami. Using behavioral tests and nerve recordings with KO mice, we showed that the response to IMP and the potentiation of the response to MSG by IMP were mediated by
-gustducin but not by
-transducin and that in the
absence of
-gustducin, the potentiation by IMP was totally abolished (He et al., 2004| T1r1 and T1r3 are involved in the transduction of preference for MSG, but other receptors and/or pathways must exist |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Heterologous expression in HEK cells and calcium imaging studies showed that the combination of T1r3 plus T1r1 forms a broadly tuned L-amino acid receptor in rodents and a more narrowly tuned umami receptor in humans (Li et al., 2002
| Trpm5 and PLCß2 mediate much of the preference for MSG, but there are residual responses to umami in Trpm5 knockout mice |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Trpm5 and PLCß2 are also involved in the response to MSG, but the extent to which there are residual responses to umami and other tastants in Trpm5 KO mice is controversial. Data from one line of KO mice showed a total lack of nerve and behavioral responses to MSG concentrations up to 100mM in Trpm5 KO mice (Zhang et al., 2003
|
| Different pathways transduce the umami responses in the front and the back of the tongue |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Several lines of evidence suggest dual transduction mechanisms for umami taste. In KO mice lacking Trpm5, T1r3,
-gustducin or
-transducin the CT but not the NG
nerve responses to MSG were diminished and MSG preference but not avoidance was affected.
IMP potentiation of the response to glutamate occurs only in the front of the tongue and
was abolished in the Trpm5, T1r3 and
-gustducin KO mice. Ex vivo
stimulation by MSG of mouse fungiform papillae (located in the front of the tongue) leads
to elevation of cAMP and IP3, whereas simulation by MSG of the circumvallate papillae
(located at the back of the tongue) of rats resulted in a drop of cAMP (Ninomiya et al., 2000In summary the cascade that transduces the response to glutamate in the front of the tongue leading to preference includes T1r1, T1r3, gustducin, transducin, PLCß2 and Trpm5. However, presently very little is known of how the umami-specific signals that originate from the back of the tongue are transduced.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Chaudhari, N., Landin, A.M. and Roper, S.D. (2000) A metabotropic glutamate receptor variant functions as a taste receptor. Nat. Neurosci., 3, 113119.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Damak, S., Rong, M., Yasumatsu, K., Kokrashvili, Z., Varadarajan, V., Zou, S., Jiang, P., Ninomiya, Y. and Margolskee, R.F. (2003) Detection of sweet and umami taste in the absence of taste receptor T1r3. Science, 301, 850853.
Gilbertson, T.A., Damak, S. and Margolskee, R.F. (2000) The molecular physiology of taste transduction. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol., 10, 519527.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
He, W., Yasumatsu, K., Varadarajan, V., Yamada, A., Lem, J., Ninomiya, Y., Margolskee, R.F. and Damak, S. (2004) Umami taste responses are mediated by
-transducin and
-gustducin. J. Neurosci., 24, 76747680.
Li, X., Staszewski, L., Xu, H., Durick, K., Zoller, M. and Adler, E. (2002) Human receptors for sweet and umami taste. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 99, 46924696.
Lindemann, B. (2001) Receptors and transduction in taste. Nature, 413, 219225.[CrossRef][Medline]
Nelson, G., Chandrashekar, J., Hoon, M.A., Feng, L., Zhao, G., Ryba, N.J. and Zuker, C.S. (2002) An amino-acid taste receptor. Nature, 416, 199202.[CrossRef][Medline]
Ninomiya, Y., Nakashima, K., Fukuda, A., Nishino, H., Sugimura, T., Hino, A., Danilova, V. and Hellekant, G. (2000) Responses to umami substances in taste bud cells innervated by the chorda tympani and glossopharyngeal nerves. J. Nutr., 130, 950S953S.
Ruiz, C.J., Wray, K., Delay, E.R., Margolskee, R.F. and Kinnamon, S.C. (2003) Behavioral evidence for a role of alpha-gustducin in glutamate taste. Chem. Senses, 28, 573579.
Wong, G.T., Gannon, K.S. and Margolskee, R.F. (1996) Transduction of bitter and sweet taste by gustducin. Nature, 381, 796800.[CrossRef][Medline]
Zhang, Y., Hoon, M.A., Chandrashekar, J., Mueller, K.L., Cook, B., Wu, D., Zuker, C.S. and Ryba, N.J. (2003) Coding of sweet, bitter, and umami tastes: different receptor cells sharing similar signaling pathways. Cell, 112, 293301.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Zhao, G.Q., Zhang, Y., Hoon, M.A., Chandrashekar, J., Erlenbach, I., Ryba, N.J. and Zuker, C.S. (2003) The receptors for mammalian sweet and umami taste. Cell, 115, 255266.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. R. Trubey, S. Culpepper, Y. Maruyama, S. C. Kinnamon, and N. Chaudhari Tastants evoke cAMP signal in taste buds that is independent of calcium signaling Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, August 1, 2006; 291(2): C237 - C244. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

