Chemical Senses Vol. 30 No. suppl 1 © Oxford University
Press 2005; all rights reserved
Regulation of Taste Bud Cell Differentiation by Notch Signaling Pathway
Department of Oral Anatomy II, Kyushu Dental College, 2-6-1 Manazuru, Kokurakita-ku, Kitakyushu, 803-8580 Japan
Correspondence to be sent to: Yuji Seta, e-mail: yujiseta{at}kyu-dent.ac.jp
Key words: differentiation, Hes6, Mash1, Notch signaling pathway, taste bud
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The Notch pathway is involved in determining cell fate within the nervous system and in various sensory organs (Lanford et al., 1999
In the present study, to begin to understand the mechanisms that regulate taste bud cell differentiation in fetal lingual epithelia, we have investigated the expression patterns of Notch and its ligands, Delta-like 1 (Dll1) and Jaggeds, hairy/enhancer of split (Hes1), and a mammalian homolog of the achaete-scute complex (Mash1) in fetal and adult mouse tongues using in situ hybridization. These genes are expressed in complex, dynamic patterns both in developing taste papillae and in taste cells within adult taste buds. The timing and pattern of early Notch signaling expression suggests a role for these genes in either sharpening the borders of developing papillae and/or specifying taste bud progenitors within papillae. Expression of Notch pathway genes in mature taste buds suggests that this signaling system may function in cell lineage decisions within taste buds.
| Materials and methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Tissue preparation
Timed pregnant CD-1 mice were obtained from Charles River (Wilmington, MA). The mice were overdosed with sodium pentobarbital, and E13E18 embryos were surgically removed. The tongue tissues from embryos and adult mice were fixed overnight in 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) in phosphate-buffer, pH 7.4, and embedded in OCT compound (Sakura, Torrance, CA). Cryostat sections (68 µm) were mounted on Superfrost slides (Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA) and stored in airtight boxes at 80°C.
In situ hybridization
Sections were washed in PBS and treated for 10 min with 0.2N HCl and for 5 min with proteinase K (1 µg/ml in TE). They were washed in PBS and refixed for 20 min in 4% PFA. They then were treated twice for 15 min with glycine (2 mg/ml in PBS). After washing with PBS, sections were prehybridized for 1 h at room temperature in hybridization buffer containing 50% formamide; 1.3x SSC; 5 mM EDTA; 0.5% CHAPS; 0.1% Tween 20; 1% blocking reagent (Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Germany); 100 µg/ml tRNA; 50 µg/ml heparin. Digoxigenin-labeled antisense and sense riboprobes were produced from plasmids containing Mash1, Dll1, Jagged1-2, Hes1 and Notch1-4. Hybridization was performed overnight at 60°C in hybridization buffer containing 0.51.0 µg/ml riboprobe. Excess probe was removed by sequential washes in 2x SSC, 0.1x SSC and MABT (0.1 M maleic acid, 0.15 M NaCl and 0.1% Tween 20) twice at room temperature. Sections were blocked for 1 h in 1% blocking reagent in MAB (0.1 M maleic acid and 0.15 M NaCl). Then sections were incubated for 2 h with anti-digoxigenin antibody conjugated to alkaline phosphatase diluted 1:250 in blocking solution. After rinsing with MABT, sections were equilibrated with color buffer containing 100 mM Tris, pH 9.5; 50 mM MaCl2; 100 mM NaCl; and 0.1% Tween 20. Antibody was visualized by using the 4-Nitro blue tetrazolinium chloride/ 5-Bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-phosphate (NBT/BCIP) blue color reaction. Prior to photography or immunohistochemistry, sections were refixed in 4% PFA.
Immunohistochemistry
After in situ hybridization, some sections were analyzed for presence of the taste receptor cell markers PGP9.5 (ubiquitin carboxyl terminal hydrolase) or gustducin. Sections were rinsed in PBS and blocked for 2 h in 5% goat serum in PBS. Incubation with primary rabbit anti-PGP9.5 (1:300; Biogenesis, UK) or primary rabbit anti-gustducin (1:1000; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, USA) occurred overnight at 4°C in a humidified chamber. After rinsing with PBS, sections were incubated with Alexa Fluor 488 or 568 conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (Molecular Probes, USA) overnight at 4°C. Slides were rinsed with PBS and coverslipped with Fluoromount G (Southern Biotechnology Associates, USA).
| Results and discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The results of our studies demonstrate that Notch-associated genes are expressed both in developing taste epithelia, and in the taste buds of adults. During the development of mouse circumvallate papillae, Notch signaling genes display temporal and spatial changes of expression. Notch-associated gene expression is initially broad in the lingual epithelium. But expression of many of these genes then resolves to the trench wall epithelium of developing circumvallate papillae, such that scattered labeled cells are located in the dorsal trench epithelium with more extensive labeling deep in the ventral trench. In adult taste buds, Notch-associated genes display spatial regulated expression pattern. Mash1 is expressed in basal cells of taste buds and in small number of fusiform (PGP9.5 positive) taste cells. But Dll1 is expressed in many fusiform taste cells, those expressing both PGP9.5 and gustducin. Notch1 is expressed basal cells adjacent to taste buds, and may identify precursor cells for basal cells in taste buds. On the other hand, Notch3 and Notch4 are expressed in fusiform taste cells and basal cells of taste buds, as are Hes1 and Jagged1/2.
In the present study, Notch-associated genes display spatial regulated expression
pattern in adult taste buds. Mash1 is expressed in basal cells of taste buds and in small
number of fusiform (PGP9.5 positive) taste cells. Immunoreactivity of PGP9.5, marker of
paraneuron, is localized in the Type III or gustatory cells which make synapse with nerve
terminal (Kanazawa and Yoshie, 1996
).
Our observation suggests that Mash1 may regulate the differentiation of PGP9.5 positive
taste receptor cells. On the other hand, Dll1 is expressed in many fusiform taste cells,
those expressing both PGP9.5 and gustducin. Gustducin, a G-protein implicated in both
sweet and bitter transduction, occurs only in some Type II cells (Tabata et al., 1995
;
Boughter et al., 1997
). Based
on our observation of the colocalization Dll1 and PGP9.5/gustducin in adult taste buds,
Dll1 expressing fusiform taste cells are taste receptor cells. Other Notch-associated
genes, Notch3 and Notch4 are expressed in fusiform taste cells and basal cells of taste
buds, as are Hes1 and Jagged1/2. Recent studies have revealed that Notch signaling
pathway is involved in promoting the choice of cell fate in sensory organs. Notch1 and
Hes1 are downregulated in neuron, but continue to be expressed in glial cells in their
development in the retina (Furukawa et
al., 2000
). In the inner ear developing hair cells express Jagged2, and
Jagged2 activates Notch in neighboring cells, preventing those cells from developing as
hair cells (Lanford et al.,
1999
). Hes1 represses neuronal differentiation by suppression of proneural
bHLH factors. The suppressive mechanisms of Hes1 on proneural bHLH factors are suggested
to involve two way pathways: one suppressing formation of the Mash1/E2A complex though
proteinprotein interaction and the other repressing Mash1 transcription. Recent
studies have disclosed that repressive bHLH factors such as Hes1 may be regulated by the
Notch pathway (Jarriault et al.,
1995
;
Schroeter et al., 1998
).
Mammalian taste buds contain several morphologically and biochemically distinguishable
types of cells. On the basis of the observation of the ultrastructural studies, mammalian
taste bud cells are classified into at least two cell types, supporting cells and sensory
cells (Murray, 1969
, 1973;
Seta and Toyoshima, 1995
). Our in
situ hybridization analyses show Notch3, Notch4 and Hes1 express in subset of
fusiform taste cells, and also Notch ligands, Jagged1, Jagged2 and Dll1 express in subset
of taste cells. These expression data imply that subset of taste cells expressing Notch3,
Notch4, and Hes1 may be supporting cells (non-receptor cells), and Notch-ligands
expressing cells may be receptor cells expressing PGP9.5 and gustducin. These results
suggest that the Notch signaling pathway may be involved in determination of taste
receptor cell types within taste buds of adult.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Boughter, J.D., Pumplin, D.W., Yu, C., Christy, R.C. and Smith, D.V. (1997) Differential expression of alpha-gustducin in taste bud populations of the rat and hamster. J. Neurosci., 17, 28522858.
Cau, E., Grawohl, G., Casarosa, S., Kageyama, R. and Guillemot, F. (2000) Hes genes regulate sequential stages of neurogenesis in the olfactory epithelium. Development, 127, 23232332.[Abstract]
Furukawa, T., Mukherjee, S., Bao, Z.Z., Morrow, E.M. and Cepko, C.L. (2000) rax, Hes1, and notch1 promote the formation of Muller glia by postnatal retinal progenitor cells. Neuron, 26, 383394.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Guillemot, F., Lo, L.C., Johnson, J.E., Auerbach, A., Anderson, D.J. and Joyner, A.L. (1993) Mammalian achaete-scute homolog 1 is required for the early development of olfactory and autonomic neurons. Cell, 75, 463476.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Ito, T., Udaka, N., Yazawa, T., Okudela, K., Hayashi, H., Sudo, T., Guillemot, F., Kageyama, R. and Kitamura, H. (2000) Basic helixloophelix transcription factors regulate the neuroendocrine differentiation of fetal mouse pulmonary epithelium. Development, 127, 39133921.[Abstract]
Kanazawa, H. and Yoshie, S. (1996) The taste bud and its innervation in the rat as studied by immunohistochemistry for PGP9.5. Arch. Histol. Cytol., 59, 357367.[Web of Science][Medline]
Jarriault, S., Brou, C., Logeat, F., Schroeter, E.H., Kopan, R. and Israel, A. (1995) Signalling downstream of activated mammalian Notch. Nature, 377, 355358.[CrossRef][Medline]
Lanford, P.J., Lan, Y., Jiang, R., Lindsell, C., Weinmaster, G., Gridley, T. and Kelley, M.W. (1999) Notch signalling pathway mediates hair cell development in mammalian cochlea. Nat. Genet., 21, 289292.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Murray, R.G. (1969) Cell types in rabbit taste buds. In: Pfaffmann, C., (ed.), Olfaction and Taste III. Rockefeller University Press, New York, pp. 331344.
Murray, R.G. (1973) The ultrastructure of taste buds. In: Friedemann, I. (ed.), The Ultrastructure of Sensory Organs. North Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 181.
Schroeter, E.H., Kisslinger, J.A. and Kopan, R. (1998) Notch-1 signalling requires ligand-induced proteolytic release of intracellular domain. Nature, 393, 382386.[CrossRef][Medline]
Seta, Y. and Toyoshima, K. (1995) Three-dimensional structure of the gustatory cell in the mouse fungiform taste buds: a computer-assisted reconstruction. Anat. Embryol., 191, 8388.[Medline]
Seta, Y., Toyono, T., Takeda, S. and Toyoshima, K. (1999) Expression of Mash1 in basal cell of rat circumvallate taste buds is dependent upon gustatory innervation. FEBS Lett., 444, 4346.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Tabata, S., Crowley, H.H., Böttger, B., Finger, T.E., Margolskee, R.F. and Kinnamon, J.C. (1995) Immunoelectron microscopical analysis of gustducin in taste cells of the rat. Chem. Senses, 21, 778.
Tomita, K., Nakanishi, S., Guillemot, F. and Kageyama, R. (1996) Mash1 promotes neuronal differentiation in the retina. Genes Cells, 1, 765774.[Abstract]
Zine, A., van de Water, T.R. and de Ribaupierre, F. (2000) Notch signaling regulates the pattern of auditory hair cell differentiation in mammals. Development, 127, 33733383.[Abstract]
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||