Chemical Senses Advance Access originally published online on October 27, 2006
Chemical Senses 2007 32(1):51-55; doi:10.1093/chemse/bjl035
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Broad Activation of the Glomerular Layer Enhances Subsequent Olfactory Responses
Department of Neurobiology and Behavior, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA
Correspondence to be sent to: Cynthia C. Woo, Department of Neurobiology and Behavior, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697-4550, USA. e-mail: cwoo{at}uci.edu
 |
Abstract |
|---|
 Top Abstract IntroductionMaterials and methodsResultsDiscussionAcknowledgementsReferences |
|---|
Early olfactory experience with a specific odorant enhances the subsequent response of the glomerular layer of the rat olfactory bulb to that same odorant. Because different odorants activate different glomerular layer regions, it seemed plausible that experience with a large number of odorants might result in enhanced glomerular activation during subsequent exposure to both the previously experienced odorants and the novel odorants evoking activity in regions that overlapped with those previously stimulated by different odorants. To this end, 7 odorants were selected using our glomerular response data archive that together stimulated much of the glomerular layer (alpha-phellandrene, benzaldehyde, L-carvone, decanal, pentanol, santalol, and valeric acid). Young rats were exposed to a different odorant each day for 7 days, and this cycle was repeated 3 times from postnatal days 1–21. The [14C]2-deoxyglucose technique was used to measure neural activity in response to both previously experienced and novel odorants. The 2 novel odorants (alpha-ionone and L-menthone) activate regions of the glomerular layer that overlap with those stimulated by the 7 enrichment odorants. Our results indicate that early experience with multiple odorants results in increased responsiveness both to previously experienced odorants and to novel odorants that stimulate previously activated regions of the bulb.
Key words: deoxyglucose, enriched environment, mapping, olfaction
|
Introduction |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMaterials and methodsResultsDiscussionAcknowledgementsReferences |
|---|
Olfactory experiences during the early postnatal period can have a large impact on the development of the olfactory system in rodents. For example, enriched odor experience during the first 3 postnatal weeks with a specific odorant results in a significant increase in [14C]2-deoxyglucose (2-DG) uptake in focal regions of the glomerular layer in response to that same odorant (Coopersmith and Leon 1984; Johnson et al. 1995
; Johnson and Leon 1996). In another series of studies of glomerular responses, we have supported the idea of a combinatorial code for olfactory processing, in which different odorants can share glomerular representations by possessing common molecular features (Johnson et al. 1998, 1999, 2002; Johnson and Leon 2000a, 2000b). It therefore seemed possible that if rats experienced a number of odorants that together evoked responses over a wide area of the bulb, novel odorants may also be able to evoke an enhanced response if they had overlapping responses with previously experienced odorants.
To ensure that a sufficient portion of the glomerular layer was activated by our panel of odorants, we selected 7 odorants from our glomerular response data archive (http://leonserver.bio.uci.edu) that we knew together would stimulate virtually the entire glomerular layer: alpha-phellandrene, benzaldehyde, L-carvone, decanal, pentanol, santalol, and valeric acid. Each of these enrichment exposure odorants stimulated a different region of the bulb, but collectively, the odorants stimulated the entire bulb (Johnson et al. 2002). Groups of young rats were exposed to different odorants over the first 3 postnatal weeks. A variety of chemical classes were presented in this odorant series: alcohols, acids, ketones, and aldehydes. Animals experienced 3 cycles of a 7-day rotation of odorants, with odorants changed daily for postnatal days 1–21. Two alicyclic ketone test odorants (alpha-ionone and L-menthone) were selected from the odorant archive that shared molecular features with some of the enrichment odorants. These 2 odorants activated regions that overlapped with the glomerular regions activated by the enrichment odorants and were used as novel test odorants in the study. The 2-DG method was used to determine the bulbar neural response to both previously experienced odorants and the 2 novel odorants.
|
Materials and methods |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMaterials and methodsResultsDiscussionAcknowledgementsReferences |
|---|
Odor enrichment for odor-coding analysis
To ensure that a sufficient portion of the glomerular layer was activated by the odorants, we used our glomerular response data archive to select 7 odorants that together would activate the vast majority of the glomerular layer. These 7 odorants were alpha-phellandrene, benzaldehyde, L-carvone, decanal, 1-pentanol, santalol, and valeric acid (Figure 1). Beginning on postnatal day 1, 6–9 drops of undiluted odorant were applied on a clean cotton ball that was put in a metal tea ball suspended from the top of the housing cage. Two such metal tea balls were suspended in different areas of each cage. Litters in the enriched group (n = 10) were exposed to 1 odorant per day, and the odorant was different for each of 7 days. This odorant schedule was repeated over the course of 3 weeks. Control litters (n = 10) were exposed to 2 tea balls each containing a clean cotton ball that was changed daily. Control and enriched litters were housed in separate rooms to avoid odor contamination. All procedures used in this study were approved by the Irvine Animal Care and Use Committee.
|
2-DG procedure
Odorants were volatilized by bubbling high-purity nitrogen gas through the liquid in a gas-washing bottle. Volatilized odorants were then diluted by mixing the vapor with ultra-zero–grade air at a final flow rate of 2 l/min. Flow rates were regulated and measured with Gilmont flow meters. On postnatal day 22, using our standard technique (Johnson et al. 1998), male rats (n = 9–10 per group in a split-litter design) were injected subcutaneously with 2-DG (0.2 mCi/kg; Sigma Chemicals, St Louis, MO) and immediately exposed to a previously experienced odorant (L-carvone or valeric acid) or to a novel odorant (alpha-ionone or L-menthone). Animals were breathing freely and remained in Mason jars during the 45-min odor exposure. Animals were decapitated, and brains were rapidly removed and frozen in –45° isopentane. Frozen coronal sections were cut at 20 µm through the entire bulb, and every sixth section was used for autoradiography.
Mapping procedure
The activity in the glomerular layer was mapped as previously described (Johnson et al. 1999, 2002, 2004), using customized image analysis software. Briefly, the glomerular layer was located in regularly spaced, coronal, autoradiographic images of 2-DG uptake by using overlaid images of adjacent sections that had been stained with cresyl violet. Discrete measurements of radioactivity were taken at intervals specified by the intersections of the glomerular layer with standard grid lines chosen on the basis of each section's relative anterior–posterior position between anatomical landmarks. The resulting data arrays were transformed to correct for the different sizes of individual bulbs, and the matrices corresponding to left and right bulbs for each animal were averaged to produce anatomically standardized matrices corresponding to the entire extent of the glomerular layer. The average uptake array for animals exposed to air vehicle was subtracted from each odorant-exposed animal's array. The distribution of uptake across the layer was plotted as color-coded contour charts. To examine amounts of uptake, we expressed glomerular layer radioactivity as a ratio to that measured in the subependymal zone of the same brain. Statistical analysis of these subependymal zone values revealed no significant differences across experimental groups (F[1, 4] = 1.989; P = 0.162). To examine patterns of uptake independent of the amount of uptake, we expressed individual measurements as z scores of relative activity across the same bulb.
Modules and quantitative comparisons of odorant-evoked activity
Statistical comparisons of the patterns and amounts of uptake across the bulb were made after reducing the complexity of the data matrices. To accomplish this reduction, we obtained a single mean value for each of 27 nonoverlapping regions of the bulb that were determined in previous studies to display common responses to particular odorant molecular features (Linster et al. 2001; Johnson et al. 2002). For comparisons of uptake patterns, we used the maximum z score value within each of these response regions (Linster et al. 2001; Johnson et al. 2004, 2005).
|
Results |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMaterials and methodsResultsDiscussionAcknowledgementsReferences |
|---|
Odor enrichment increases neural activity in the glomerular layer
Early olfactory enrichment using multiple odorants increased the uptake of 2-DG both to previously experienced odorants and to novel odorants (Figure 2, top). Increased levels of uptake were apparent across the entire layer encompassing most of the bulb, both within high-uptake foci and across regions of the layer not displaying high levels of uptake (Figure 2, bottom, yellow, orange, and red). Using a 3-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), neural activity (average uptake divided by subependymal zone) patterns were compared across group conditions, odorants, and 27 glomerular response modules that we had identified previously. A statistically significant increase in activity was observed across groups (F[1, 26] = 225.59; P < 0.0001), with enriched animals exhibiting increased activity in response to the test odorants relative to controls for both previously experienced (L-carvone and valeric acid) and novel odorants (alpha-ionone and L-menthone). In addition, statistically significant differences also were observed across odorants (F[1, 1890] = 311.162; P < 0.0001) and across glomerular response modules (F[26, 1890] = 35.230; P < 0.0001).
|
Odor enrichment does not change the normalized spatial pattern of activity in the glomerular layer
The spatial pattern of activity evoked by the various odorants was examined separately, using the calculated z score values. The z score analyses allow one to examine patterns of activity by normalizing the data matrices, thereby de-emphasizing absolute activity values. A 3-way ANOVA of maximum z score values across group condition, odorants, and glomerular modules revealed no difference between enriched and control groups (F[1, 1890] = 2.731; P > 0.05), although the expected difference was observed across odorants (F[3, 1890] = 108.96; P < 0.0001), as well as the expected difference across the glomerular response modules (F[26, 1890] = 73.976; P < 0.0001).
|
Discussion |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMaterials and methodsResultsDiscussionAcknowledgementsReferences |
|---|
Early olfactory enrichment using multiple odorants significantly increased the intensity of neural activity in response to both familiar odorants and unfamiliar odorants that were structurally similar. The spatial patterns of activity evoked by each of these odorants, however, remained unchanged. It appears, therefore, that olfactory enrichment during the first 3 postnatal weeks does not change the spatial representation of the odorants within the bulb, but rather, affects the intensity of the response of the bulb to these odorants. The 2 novel odorants stimulated regions of the bulb that overlapped with the previously experienced odorants used during the enrichment procedure, demonstrating that responses evoked by one odorant can lead to enhanced responsiveness to other odorants that stimulate spatially similar regions of the bulb.
One hypothesis for why pre-exposure to one odorant would increase the level of response to another is that these odorants might stimulate the same receptors, sensory neurons, and glomeruli. Individual odorants typically activate local clusters involving multiple glomeruli (Johnson et al. 1998, 1999), suggesting that these glomeruli receive projections from sensory neurons of similar specificity (Johnson et al. 1999, 2004). The particular combination of glomeruli activated is thought to convey information about the distinctive odor of the stimulus (Leon and Johnson 2003). Repeated activation of a set of glomeruli by an odorant under conditions related to those causing early odor preference learning (Coopersmith and Leon 1984; Sullivan and Leon 1986) appears to be effective in priming these glomeruli for responding to other odorants bearing overlapping molecular features.
As can be seen in the z score transformation of the glomerular activity arrays (Figure 1, top), focal areas of peak activity as well as regions of lower activity can be observed across the bulb for each of the 7 enrichment exposure odorants. These odor-specific global patterns of activity may be used by the animal to represent the individual odorants experienced by the animal (Cleland et al. 2005). From the relative 2-DG uptake arrays (Figure 1, bottom), however, it is clear that each odorant individually stimulated a large proportion of the bulb and together stimulated the entire bulb. Because the entire bulb was stimulated during the enrichment procedure, we cannot determine precisely whether the subsequent enhanced responsiveness to the novel odorants was related to the structural similarities of the novel odorants to the enrichment odorants or whether a global, generalized increase in bulb responsiveness resulted from the enrichment procedure. Global brain or behavioral changes following environmental enrichment have been observed elsewhere (Sandeman R and Sandeman D 2000; Scotto Lomassese et al. 2000; van Praag et al. 2000; Polley et al. 2004) including increased levels of neurotrophins (Pham et al. 1999; Branchi et al. 2004; Pinaud 2004), increased expression of immediate early genes (Pinaud 2004), and altered responsiveness to stress (Benaroya-Milshtein et al. 2004; Mlynarik et al. 2004).
Sensory enrichment enhances neural activity and behavioral performance in other sensory systems, including motor cortex in mice (Turner et al. 2002), the auditory system of adult rats (Engineer et al. 2004), the visual system of mice (Cancedda et al. 2004), and the mushroom body of the cricket (Scotto Lomassese et al. 2000). There are also reports of improved olfactory performance in adult mice and rats following diverse early olfactory experiences (Rochefort et al. 2002; Mandairon et al. 2006). The increase in glomerular activity following early olfactory enrichment observed here with multiple odorants is also consistent with data showing increased neural activity in the bulb following early olfactory training with a single odorant (Coopersmith and Leon 1984; Sullivan and Leon 1986; Johnson et al. 1995; Johnson and Leon 1996; Yuan et al. 2003). Because experience with one odorant does not increase responsiveness to another odorant with a very different pattern of spatial activity in the glomerular layer (Coopersmith et al. 1986), it will be interesting to determine exactly how much overlap is required for one odorant to facilitate the subsequent response of another.
|
Acknowledgements |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMaterials and methodsResultsDiscussionAcknowledgementsReferences |
|---|
This work was funded by grant DC 03840 from the NIDCD to M.L.
|
References |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMaterials and methodsResultsDiscussionAcknowledgementsReferences |
|---|
Benaroya-Milshtein N, Hollander N, Apter A, Kukulansky T, Raz N, Wilf A, Yaniv I, Pick CG. (2004) Environmental enrichment in mice decreases anxiety, attenuates stress responses and enhances natural killer cell activity. Eur J Neurosci 20:1341–1347.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Branchi I, Francia N, Alleva E. (2004) Epigenetic control of neurobehavioural plasticity: the role of neurotrophins. Behav Pharmacol 15:353–362.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Cancedda L, Putignano E, Sale A, Viegi A, Berardi N, Maffei L. (2004) Acceleration of visual system development by environmental enrichment. J Neurosci 24:4840–4848.
Cleland T, Johnson B, Leon M, Linster C. (2005) Glomerular computations in the olfactory bulb can normalize neural response patterns to a range of odor concentrations. Program No. 614.12. 2005. Abstract Viewer and Itinerary Planner(Society for Neuroscience, Washington (DC)).
Coopersmith R, Henderson SR, Leon M. (1986) Odor specificity of the enhanced neural response following early odor experience in rats. Dev Brain Res 27:191–197.[CrossRef]
Coopersmith R and Leon M. (1984) Enhanced neural response to familiar olfactory cues. Science 4664:849–851.
Engineer ND, Percaccio CR, Pandya PK, Moucha R, Rathbun DL, Kilgard MP. (2004) Environmental enrichment improves response strength, threshold, selectivity, and latency of auditory cortex neurons. J Neurophysiol 92:73–82.
Johnson BA, Farahbod H, Leon M. (2005) Interactions between odorant functional group and hydrocarbon structure influence activity in glomerular response modules in the rat olfactory bulb. J Comp Neurol 483:205–216.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Johnson BA, Farahbod H, Xu Z, Saber S, Leon M. (2004) Local and global chemotopic organization: general features of the glomerular representations of aliphatic odorants differing in carbon number. J Comp Neurol 480:234–249.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Johnson BA, Ho SL, Xu Z, Yihan JS, Yip S, Hingco EE, Leon M. (2002) Functional mapping of the rat olfactory bulb using diverse odorants reveals modular responses to functional groups and hydrocarbon structural features. J Comp Neurol 449:180–194.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Johnson BA and Leon M. (1996) Spatial distribution of [14C]2-deoxyglucose uptake in the glomerular layer of the rat olfactory bulb following early odor preference learning. J Comp Neurol 376:557–566.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Johnson BA and Leon M. (2000a) Modular representations of odorants in the glomerular layer of the rat olfactory bulb and the effects of stimulus concentration. J Comp Neurol 422:496–509.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Johnson BA and Leon M. (2000b) Odorant molecular length: one aspect of the olfactory code. J Comp Neurol 426:330–338.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Johnson BA, Woo CC, Duong H, Nguyen V, Leon M. (1995) A learned odor evokes an enhanced Fos-like glomerular response in the olfactory bulb of young rats. Brain Res 699:192–200.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Johnson BA, Woo CC, Hingco EE, Pham KL, Leon M. (1999) Multidimensional chemotopic responses to n-aliphatic and acid odorants in the rat olfactory bulb. J Comp Neurol 409:529–548.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Johnson BA, Woo CC, Leon M. (1998) Spatial coding of odorant features in the glomerular layer of the rat olfactory bulb. J Comp Neurol 393:457–471.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Leon M and Johnson BA. (2003) Olfactory coding in the mammalian olfactory bulb. Brain Res Rev 42:23–32.[CrossRef][Medline]
Linster C, Johnson BA, Morse A, Yue E, Xu Z, Hingco EE, Choi Y, Choi M, Messiha A, Leon M. (2001) Perceptual correlates of neural representations evoked by odorant enantiomers. J Neurosci 21:9827–9843.
Mandairon N, Stack C, Kiselycznyk C, Linster C. (2006) Enrichment to odors improves olfactory discrimination in adult rats. Behav Neurosci 120:173–179.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Mlynarik M, Johansson BB, Jezova D. (2004) Enriched environment influences adrenocortical response to immune challenge and glutamate receptor gene expression in rat hippocampus. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1018:273–280.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Pham TM, Ickes B, Albeck D, Soderstrom S, Granholm AC, Mohammed AH. (1999) Changes in brain nerve growth factor levels and nerve growth factor receptors in rats exposed to environmental enrichment for one year. Neuroscience 94:279–286.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Pinaud R. (2004) Experience-dependent immediate early gene expression in the adult central nervous system: evidence from enriched-environment studies. Int J Pharm 272:109–119.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Polley DB, Kvasnak E, Frostig RD. (2004) Naturalistic experience transforms sensory maps in the adult cortex of caged animals. Nature 429:67–71.[CrossRef][Medline]
Rochefort C, Gheusi G, Vincent JD, Lledo PM. (2002) Enriched odor exposure increases the number of newborn neurons in the adult olfactory bulb and improves odor memory. J Neurosci 22:2679–2689.
Sandeman R and Sandeman D. (2000) "Impoverished" and "enriched" living conditions influence the proliferation and survival of neurons in crayfish brain. J Neurobiol 45:215–226.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Scotto Lomassese S, Strambi C, Strambi A, Charpin P, Augier R, Aouane A, Cayre M. (2000) Influence of environmental stimulation on neurogenesis in the adult insect brain. J Neurobiol 45:162–171.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Sullivan RM and Leon M. (1986) Early olfactory learning induces an enhanced olfactory bulb response in young rats. Dev Brain Res 27:278–282.[CrossRef]
Turner CA, Yang MC, Lewis MH. (2002) Environmental enrichment: effects on stereotyped behavior and regional neuronal metabolic activity. Brain Res 938:15–21.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
van Praag H, Kempermann G, Gage FH. (2000) Neural consequences of environmental enrichment. Nat Rev Neurosci 1:191–198.[Web of Science][Medline]
Yuan Q, Harley CW, Darby-King A, Neve RL, McLean JH. (2003) Early odor preference learning in the rat: bidirectional effects of cAMP response element-binding protein (CREB) and mutant CREB support a causal role for phosphorylated CREB. J Neurosci 23:4760–4765.
Accepted 23 September 2006
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  N. Mandairon and C. Linster Odor Perception and Olfactory Bulb Plasticity in Adult Mammals J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2009; 101(5): 2204 - 2209. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||