Skip Navigation



Chemical Senses Advance Access published online on February 13, 2007

Chemical Senses, doi:10.1093/chemse/bjm003
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
32/4/329    most recent
bjm003v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sato, T.
Right arrow Articles by Toda, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sato, T.
Right arrow Articles by Toda, K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Analysis of Slow Depolarizing Potential in Frog Taste Cell Induced by Parasympathetic Efferent Stimulation under Hypoxia

Toshihide Sato1, Kazushisa Nishishita2, Yukio Okada1 and Kazuo Toda1

1 Divisions of Integrated Sensory Physiology 2 Oral Pathopharmacology, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, 1-7-1 Sakamoto, Nagasaki 852-8588, Japan

Correspondence to be sent to: Toshihide Sato, Division of Integrated Sensory Physiology, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, 1-7-1 Sakamoto, Nagasaki 852-8588, Japan. e-mail: toshi{at}net.nagasaki-u.ac.jp


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Strong electrical stimulation (ES) of the frog glossopharyngeal (GP) efferent nerve induced slow depolarizing potentials (DPs) in taste cells under hypoxia. This study aimed to elucidate whether the slow DPs were postsynaptically induced in taste cells. After a block of parasympathetic nerve (PSN) ganglia by tubocurarine, ES of GP nerve never induced slow DPs in the taste cells, so slow DPs were induced by PSN. When Ca2+ in the blood plasma under hypoxia was decreased to ~0.5 mM, the slow DPs reduced in amplitude and lengthened in latency. Increasing the normal Ca2+ to ~20 mM increased the amplitude of slow DPs and shortened the latency. Addition of Cd2+ to the plasma greatly reduced the amplitude of slow DPs and lengthened the latency. These data suggest that the slow DPs depend on Ca2+ and Cd2+ concentration at the presynaptic PSN terminals of taste disk. Antagonists, [D-Arg1, D-Trp7,9, Leu11]-substance P and L-703 606, of neurotransmitter substance P neurokinin1 receptor completely blocked the slow DPs. Intravenous application of substance P induced a DP of ~7 mV and a reduction of membrane resistance of ~48% in taste cells. A nonselective cation channel antagonist, flufenamic acid, completely blocked the slow DPs. These findings suggest that the slow DPs are postsynaptically initiated in frog taste cells under hypoxia by opening nonselective cation channels on the postsynaptic membrane after substance P is probably released from the presynaptic PSN axon terminals.

Key words: frog taste cell, gustatory efferent synapse, hypoxia, presynaptic modulation, slow depolarizing potential


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The dorsal tongue surface in frogs has a great number of fungiform papillae in which single taste disks are located at the tops. The taste disk is innervated by somatosensory and gustatory afferent fibers and parasympathetic nerve (PSN) efferent fibers (Sato 1976Go; Sato et al. 1983Go, 2005Go; Inoue et al. 1992Go). Electron-microscopic studies have suggested that taste receptor cells have both afferent and efferent synapses (Nomura et al. 1975Go; Witt 1993Go; Yoshie et al. 1996Go). Electrophysiological studies revealed that electrical stimulation (ES) of glossopharyngeal (GP) efferent fibers induces a slow postsynaptic potential in frog taste cells (Sato et al. 2002Go, 2004Go, 2005Go), and the taste cell responses induced by gustatory stimuli are modulated by the slow postsynaptic potential (Sato et al. 2005Go).

Under a normal velocity of capillary blood flow (1–1.5 mm/s) in the tongue, ES of the PSN efferent fibers in the GP nerve of frogs induces slow hyperpolarizing potentials (HPs) alone in taste cells, which show the biophysical properties of slow postsynaptic potentials (Sato et al. 2004Go, 2005Go). Our studies (Sato et al. 2002Go, 2004Go) suggest that the slow HPs in frog taste cells are induced by closing nonselective cation channels on the proximal membrane of taste cells following a release of substance P from the presynaptic axon terminals. At gustatory disks of the frog fungiform papillae, PSN efferent fibers might make synaptic contacts with the proximal processes of taste cells (Sato et al. 2005Go). Because the activity of the efferent axon terminals produces a slow HP in taste cells as presynaptic cells, presynaptic facilitation (Mendell and Wall 1964Go; Ganong 2003Go) will occur at gustatory afferent synaptic transmission (Sato et al. 2006Go).

When the velocity of capillary blood flow in the frog tongue is lowered at <0.2 mm/s, venous O2 tension (PO2) is estimated to be <4.5 mmHg (<20% of maximum) (Prosser and Brown 1965Go; Wilson 1979Go). In this situation, PSN stimulation induces a slow depolarizing potential (DP) alone in frog taste cells. This is a kind of slow postsynaptic potential (Sato et al. 2002Go). Since PSN-induced slow DPs appear in taste cells via an efferent synapse on the taste cells, presynaptic inhibition (Eccles 1973Go; Ganong 2003Go) will occur at gustatory afferent synaptic transmission.

As arterial PO2 and blood pressure are decreased, the tissue respiration is gradually reduced and thereby tissue activities are damaged by O2 deficiency. With decreasing PO2 in blood, most of the O2-sensitive ion channels are gradually inhibited to reduce the tissue activity, resulting in avoiding loss of metabolic energies under hypoxia (López-Barneo et al. 2001Go). It is tempting that the physiological properties and generative mechanism of slow DPs in frog taste cells are clarified for understanding switching mechanism between slow HP and slow DP under different PO2 levels.

The main objective of the present study is to elucidate whether slow DPs are postsynaptically induced in frog taste cells by PSN stimulation under hypoxia. We examined the effects of 1) Ca2+ and Cd2+ and 2) neurotransmitter receptor antagonists and agonists on the slow DPs. The results suggest that the slow PDs are postsynaptically induced in frog taste cells under hypoxia by substance P probably released from the PSN terminals in the taste disk.


    Materials and methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Preparation, recording, and stimulation

All experiments were performed under the Guideline for Animal Experimentation of Nagasaki University. The experiments were carried out with the whole body in bullfrogs (Rana catesbeiana) anesthetized with 50% urethane solution at a dose of 1–3 g/kg body weight (b. w.). The methods of making experimental preparations, electrical recording from taste cells, and ES of the GP nerve were the same as previously mentioned (Sato et al. 2002Go, 2004Go, 2005Go). In briefly, changes in the membrane potential of taste cells in the fungiform papillae were intracellularly recorded with a microelectrode filled with 3 M KCl. The distal part of cut GP nerve was electrically stimulated at 30 Hz with pulses of 0.1-ms duration and 15-V strength to obtain the maximal slow DPs from a taste cell. The microelectrode was always advanced into the lower portion of intermediate layer of the taste disk to impale taste receptor cells. In order to avoid penetrating a basal cell, the microelectrode was advanced into the central area of the taste disks. The criteria of taste cell penetration were appearance of 3-step potential changes in the membrane potentials of the taste cells (Sato et al. 2005Go, 2006Go). Input resistance of taste cells was measued with a bridge by passing a constant hyperpolarizing current at 1 Hz into an impaled taste cell. All experiments were carried out at room temperature (23 °C–26 °C).

Drugs

CaCl2, CdCl2, ethylene glycol-bis(2-aminoethyl-ether)-N,N,N',N'-tetraacetic acid (EGTA), prazosin hydrochloride, DL-propranolol hydrochloride, (±)-SKF-83566 hydrochloride, metergoline, tropine 3,5-dichlorobenzoate, spiperone, calcitonin gene–related peptide (CGRP) fragment 8–37, vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) fragment 6–28, [D-Arg1, D-Trp7,9, Leu11]-substance P acetate salt, L-703 606 oxalate salt, substance P acetate salt, flufenamic acid, tubocurarine chloride, and atropine sulfate salt were used. All drugs were purchased from Sigma–Aldrich Co (St Louis, MO).

The synaptic regions of taste cells in the taste disks were perfused via abundant capillary vessels in the fungiform papillae (Jaeger and Hillman 1976Go) by intravenously (i. v.) injecting a frog Ringer solution containing pharmacological drugs. The amount of injected Ringer solution was 2 ml/kg b. w. To check that an injected drug may reach synaptic area of taste disks, 4% methylene blue solution was i. v. injected at 4 ml/kg b. w. Taste disks of all the fungiform papillae in the tongue were stained blue within 1 min after the injection. Blue-stained nerve fiber terminals within the taste disks were found by inspecting the isolated fungiform papillae with a light microscope (400x). This suggests that i. v. injected drug easily reaches gustatory synaptic area. Ca2+ concentrations in the blood plasma were decreased by injecting EGTA at 23.9 mg/kg b. w. and increased by injecting CaCl2 at 116 mg/kg b. w. Estimated low and high Ca2+ concentrations in the plasma were ~0.5 and ~20 mM, respectively, which were calculated from the amount of injected drugs and the plasma volume of frogs (4% of the b. w.) (Thorson 1964Go). Normal Ca2+ in the frog plasma is ~2 mM (Wilson 1979Go).

Experimental procedure

Strong repetitive ES of GP nerve produces a large slow potential on the lingual surface and taste disk cells. This derives from the physicochemical junction potential generating between a secreted saliva from lingual glands and a lingual surface solution (Sato et al. 2000Go). The junction potential disturbs an analysis of physiological slow DPs in taste cells. Therefore, soon after anesthesia of animal with a urethane-Ringer solution, atropine sulfate was injected i. v. at 1 mg/kg b. w. to completely block the junction potential. The injection effect lasted for >7 h.

The PSN fibers in the GP nerve innervate the taste disk of the frog fungiform papillae, and ES of the fibers induces slow HPs alone in frog taste cells under the normal velocity of capillary blood flow (1–1.5 mm/s) along the fungiform papillae (Inoue et al. 1992Go; Sato et al. 2002Go, 2004Go). On the other hand, when the velocity of capillary blood flow in the frog tongue lowered at <0.2 mm/s 3–5 h after a moderate anesthesia with urethane, ES of GP nerve induces slow DPs alone in frog taste cells under hypoxia (Sato et al. 2002Go). All the experiments were carried out under the capillary blood flow rate at <0.2 mm/s.

Comparison of control and test slow DPs was performed using the data obtained from 2 different taste cell groups of the same individual. The control data were collected from 10–30 taste cells for 90 min before a drug injection, and the test response data were collected from 10 to 30 taste cells for 90 min after a 30-min circulation of an injected drug.

Statistics

All data were expressed as means ± standard errors of means (SEMs). The level of significance was set at P < 0.05 with a Student's t-test.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Effect of block of PSN ganglia on slow DP

Slow DPs were observed in 169 of 195 taste cells (87%) tested in six frogs. No other types of taste cell response were observed in the remaining 26 cells. In the frog venous blood, PO2 is estimated to be ~23 mmHg under a normal velocity of capillary blood flow and ~4.5 mmHg under a lowered velocity of capillary blood flow at 0.2 mm/s (Prosser and Brown 1965Go; Wilson 1979Go).

We examined whether ES of GP nerve elicits a slow DP in taste cells after the PSN ganglia (psng in Figure 1A) in the tongue under hypoxia were blocked by tubocurarine (1 mg/kg b. w.). Before the drug injection, a slow DP of ~5 mV accompanied by a decrease in the membrane resistance was induced in a taste cell by ES of GP nerve (Figure 1B [eft]). However, as shown in Figure 1B (right) and C, after the drug injection, no slow DPs were evoked in taste cells by ES of the GP nerve containing the sympathetic postganglionic and parasympathetic preganglionic fibers. This strongly suggests that slow DPs in taste cells are evoked only by PSN efferent fibers in the GP nerve but not by sympathetic efferent fibers.


Figure 1
View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 1 Effect of block of PSN ganglia in lingual branch of GP nerve on slow DPs. (A) Schematic diagram of afferent and efferent fibers in papillary nerve and lingual branch of GP nerve and positions of stimulating and recording electrodes. re, Recording microelectrode; psng, PSN ganglion; af, afferent fiber; psnef, PSN efferent fiber; snef, sympathetic nerve efferent fiber; GPNG, GP nerve ganglion; JG, jugular ganglion; S, sympathetic nerve trunk. GP nerve was transected in all experiments, and distal end of the transected nerve was stimulated. (B) Left, slow DP in taste cell induced by ES of GP nerve (30 Hz pulses of 0.1-ms duration and 15-V strength for 5 s in this and other figures) before i. v. injection of tubocurarine. Right, no response in taste cell by ES of GP nerve after i. v. injection of tubocurarine at 1 mg/kg b. w. To measure input resistance of a taste cell, HP pulses induced by constant hyperpolarizing currents were superimposed on membrane potential. Resting potential was –32 mV (left) and –29 mV (right). (C) Mean amplitude of slow DPs in taste cells induced by GP nerve stimulation before (left) and after (right) tubocurarine injection (1 mg/kg). Vertical bars are SEMs, and numerals near the bars are number of taste cells sampled in this and other figures. Resting potential was –31 ± 1 mV (n = 33) (before) and –32 ± 1 mV (n = 67) (after).

 
Effect of Ca2+ concentration on slow DP

It is well known that a release of neurotransmitters is triggered by Ca2+ influx at the presynaptic axon terminals and modulated depending on Ca2+ concentration at the terminals (Katz and Miledi 1967Go). To test this possibility in generating slow DPs in frog taste cells, Ca2+ concentration in the taste disks was altered by changing the amount of Ca2+ in the blood plasma. As shown in Figure 2A, the amplitude of slow DPs in taste cells was significantly smaller (P < 0.05, n = 16–18) when Ca2+ concentration in the plasma was lowered from a normal level (~2 mM) to a low level (~0.5 mM) but was significantly higher (P < 0.05, n = 14–18) when Ca2+ was increased to a high level (~20 mM). The latency of slow DPs was significantly longer at a low Ca2+ level than at a normal Ca2+ level (P < 0.05, n = 15–16) but was significantly shorter at a high Ca2+ level than at a normal Ca2+ level (P < 0.05, n = 12–15) (Figure 2B). In this experiment, when Ca2+ concentrations were low, normal, and high, the input resistance of taste cells at rest was 48 ± 11 M{Omega} (n = 16), 53 ± 13 M{Omega} (n = 15), and 56 ± 8 M{Omega} (n = 14), respectively. No differences were found among the 3 values (P > 0.05, n = 14–16). Because the intracellular recording condition in taste cells was stable, the data in Figure 2 were physiological.


Figure 2
View larger version (8K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 2 Effects of Ca2+ concentration in blood plasma on amplitude and latency of slow DPs in taste cells induced by PSN stimulation. (A) Amplitude of slow DPs in taste cells at low (~0.5 mM), normal (~2 mM), and high (~20 mM) Ca2+ concentrations. Resting potential was –31 ± 1 mV (n = 48). (B) Latency of slow DPs in taste cells at low, normal, and high Ca2+ concentrations. Resting potential was –30 ± 1 mV (n = 43).

 
The amplitude and latency of postsynaptic potentials fluctuate while they are repeatedly generated (Katz and Miledi 1965Go). To confirm such a phenomenon, slow DPs were repeatedly elicited in single taste cells by stimulating the GP nerve at 1/min. Figure 3A shows examples of a fluctuation of slow DPs under 3 different Ca2+ concentrations. The amplitude and latency of slow DPs broadly distributed at a low Ca2+ level than at a normal Ca2+ level but narrowly distributed at a high Ca2+ level than at a normal Ca2+ level (Figure 3B and C). To statistically examine the difference in fluctuation of amplitude and latency among slow DPs obtained at different Ca2+ levels, the mean amplitude and latency of slow DPs in each taste cell repeatedly stimulated were respectively normalized as 100, and the standard deviations (SDs) were compared as an index of fluctuation. SDs in amplitude of slow DPs were 53 ± 4 (SEM) (n = 10) at the low, 23 ± 2 (n = 6) at the normal, and 11 ± 2 (n = 5) at the high Ca2+ concentration. On the other hand, SDs in latency were 50 ± 5 (n = 7) at the low, 20 ± 2 (n = 6) at the normal, and 13 ± 2 (n = 5) at the high Ca2+ concentration. There were significant differences between any pairs of the 3 SDs in either amplitude or latency of the slow DPs (P < 0.05, n = 5–10). This indicates that the fluctuation in amplitude and latency of slow DPs becomes larger with decreasing Ca2+ concentration at the PSN axon terminals of the taste disks.


Figure 3
View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 3 Fluctuation of amplitude and latency of slow DPs in single taste cells induced by PSN stimulation. (A) Records of slow DPs in 3 taste cells induced by ES of PSN at 1/min at low (~0.5 mM), normal (~2 mM), and high (~20 mM) Ca2+ concentrations. Resting potential was –29 to 2 mV. (B) Histogram of amplitudes of slow DPs at low, normal, and high Ca2+ concentrations. Each histogram was obtained from different taste cells. Resting potential was –30 to 32 mV. (C) Histogram of latencies of slow DPs at low, normal, and high Ca2+ concentrations. Each histogram was from different taste cells. Resting potential was –28 to 31 mV.

 
Effect of Cd2+ on slow DP

Cd2+ is a nonselective blocker of voltage-gated Ca2+ channels (Randall 1998Go). We tested the effect of i. v. injected Cd2+ on the slow DPs in taste cells induced by PSN stimulation. The amplitude of slow DPs gradually decreased with increasing concentrations of injected Cd2+ (Figure 4). The dose-response curve was obtained from a Hill plot. When cadmium chloride was injected at 1 mg/kg b. w., the concentration of Cd2+ in the blood plasma was estimated to be 130 µM from the amount of injected drug solution and 4% plasma volume of b. w. The IC50 (intermediate concentration for half an amplitude) of CdCl2 for slow DPs was 0.01 mg/kg (~1.3 µM Cd2+). The latency of slow DPs increased from 2.1 ± 0.3 s (n = 19) in the control to 6.3 ± 0.5 s (P < 0.05, n = 18) under CdCl2 at 1 mg/kg.


Figure 4
View larger version (7K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 4 Effect of Cd2+ on amplitude of slow DPs in taste cells. CdCl2 was injected i. v. at doses of 0.0001–1 mg/kg b. w. PSN efferent fibers in GP nerve were strongly stimulated at 30 Hz. Control amplitude of slow DPs before CdCl2 injection (n = 20) was taken as 100%, and test amplitudes after the injection were relative to control. Resting potentials under injection at various doses of CdCl2 were –31 ± 1 mV (n = 20) (control), –31 ± 1 mV (n = 15) (0.0001 mg/kg), –30 ± 2 mV (n = 16) (0.001 mg/kg), –32 ± 1 mV (n = 21) (0.01 mg/kg), –30 ± 1 mV (n = 15) (0.1 mg/kg), and –32 ± 1 mV (n = 17) (1 mg/kg).

 
Effect of neurotransmitter receptor antagonists on slow DP

First, effects of 6 antagonists for biogenic amine receptors on the PSN-induced slow DPs were tested. Prazosin (a noradrenaline {alpha}1 blocker), propranolol (a noradrenaline ß blocker), metergoline (a blocker of 5HT1 and 5HT2), tropine 3,5-dichlorobenzoate (a selective blocker of 5HT3), SKF-83566 (a selective D1 blocker), and spiperone (a selective D2 blocker) were all injected i. v. at 1 mg/kg b. w. No antagonists tested had any effects on slow DPs in taste cells (P > 0.1, n = 13–31) (Figure 5A).


Figure 5
View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 5 Effects of i. v. injection of various neurotransmitter receptor antagonists on slow DPs in taste cells. (A) Effects of i. v. injection of 6 biogenic amine receptor antagonists at 1 mg/kg b.w. Resting potentials were –30 ± 0 mV (n = 90) (control), –31 ± 1 mV (n = 17) (propranolol), –32 ± 1 mV (n = 31) (prazosin), –29 ± 2 mV (n = 15) (metergoline), –29 ± 2 mV (n = 17) (tropine 3,5-dichlorobenzoate), –32 ± 1 mV (n = 18) (spiperone), and –30 ± 1 mV (n = 22) (SKF-83566). (B) Effects of i. v. injection at 1–3 mg/kg b.w. of 3 peptide receptor antagonists. In both graphs, control amplitude before drug injection was taken as 100%. Resting potentials were –30 ± 1 mV (n = 108) (control), –30 ± 1 mV (n = 15) (VIP fragment), –30 ± 1 mV (n = 19) (CGRP fragment), –29 ± 1 mV (n = 20) ([D-Arg1, D-Trp7,9, Leu11]-substance P), –32 ± 2 mV (n = 19) (L-703 606) and –30 ± 2 mV (n = 15) (L-703 606).

 
Second, because the nerve fibers containing VIP, CGRP, and substance P have been found in frog taste disks (Hirata and Kanaseki 1987Go; Kuramoto 1988Go; Kusakabe et al. 1996Go), effects of antagonists of these peptides' receptors were tested on the slow DPs in taste cells. I. v. injected drugs were VIP fragment 6–28 (a potent VIP receptor blocker), CGRP fragment 8–37 (a selective CGRP receptor blocker), [D-Arg1, D-Trp7,9, Leu11]-substance P (a substance P neurokinin1 [NK1] receptor blocker), and L-703 606 (a substance P NK1 receptor blocker). Neither VIP nor CGRP receptor antagonists affected the slow DPs in taste cells (P > 0.1, n = 15–20). Two types of substance P receptor antagonist reduced slow DPs (Figure 5B). Both L-703 606 at 3 mg/kg b. w. and [D-Arg1, D-Trp7,9, Leu11]-substance P at 2 mg/kg b. w. almost completely blocked the slow DPs (L-703 606: 1 ± 0%, P < 0.01, n = 15–17; [D-Arg1, D-Trp7,9, Leu11]-substance P: 0 ± 0%, P < 0.01, n = 18–20). These data suggest a neurotransmitter candidate for efferent synapses in frog taste cells is substance P.

DP induced by substance P

If substance P is released from the PSN axon terminals of the taste disk by excitation of the terminals, i. v. application of substance P will produce slow DPs in the taste cells. To test this possibility, changes in the membrane potential and the membrane resistance of taste cells were measured before and after the injection of substance P at 2 mg/kg b. w. (Figure 6). Resting potentials of taste cells in this preparation were –30 ± 1 mV (n = 30) before the injection. The membrane potentials gradually decreased and the amplitude of DPs reached 7 ± 2 mV (n = 12) 30 min after the injection (Figure 6A). After an i. v. injection of L-703 606 at 2 mg/kg b. w. DPs gradually returned to the resting potential level of –30 ± 1 mV (n = 26). In parallel with the changes in the membrane potentials, the control input resistance taken as 100% (n = 15) gradually decreased and reached 52 ± 5% (n = 12) (Figure 6B). After the L-703 606 injection, the decreased membrane resistance gradually returned to the control input resistance. The maximal change in the membrane resistance of taste cells was 48% of the control during i. v. application of substance P.


Figure 6
View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 6 Change in membrane potential and input resistance of taste cells induced by i. v. injection of substance P. (A) Amplitude of DPs of taste cells by substance P (2 mg/kg b. w.) and the recovery by L-703 606 (2 mg/kg b. w.). Resting potential was –30 ± 1 mV (n = 30). (B) Decrease of input resistance of taste cells by substance P and the recovery by L-703 606. At time 0, substance P was injected i. v., and at time 60 min, L-703 606 was injected i. v. Intracellular recordings were obtained from 10–16 taste cells during each 10 min. Each experimental point is mean ± SEM from these cells. All data were from one frog.

 
Effect of flufenamic acid on slow DP

Our previous work (Sato et al. 2002Go) suggested that the reversal potential of GP efferent–induced slow DPs in frog taste cells is approximately –11 mV, and slow DPs are generated by opening nonselective cation channels permeable to Na+ and K+ on the proximal process of taste cells. We tested the effects of a potent blocker of nonselective cation channels on slow DPs in taste cells. Slow DPs were blocked dose dependently by i. v. injection of flufenamic acid (Figure 7). Flufenamic acid of 5 mg/kg b. w. completely blocked slow DPs (P < 0.01, n = 20–24). This indicates that the slow DPs in taste cells are elicited by flufenamic acid–sensitive nonselective cation channels on taste cell membrane.


Figure 7
View larger version (8K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 7 Effects of i. v. injection of flufenamic acid on slow DPs in taste cells. Control amplitude was taken as 100%, and test amplitudes were relative to control. Resting potentials under injection at various doses of flufenamic acid were –32 ± 1 mV (n = 46) (control), –30 ± 1 mV (n = 18) (1 mg/kg), –31 ± 2 mV (n = 22) (2 mg/kg), and –29 ± 1 mV (n = 20) (5 mg/kg).

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
At chemical synaptic transmission, activation of voltage-gated Ca2+ channels at the presynaptic axon terminals releases neurotransmitters from the terminals. The neurotransmitters bind to receptors on the postsynaptic membrane and generate a postsynaptic potential by activating ion channels at the postsynaptic cell (Shepherd 1994Go). In the present experiments, changing Ca2+ concentration in the plasma and adding Cd2+ to the plasma greatly affected the amplitude and latency of slow DPs in frog taste cells. This suggests that Ca2+ channels at the presynaptic axon terminals of frog taste disks are activated in generating slow DPs in taste cells. The IC50 of Cd2+ for the slow DPs in frog taste cells was as low as 1.3 µM. Cd2+ is a potent blocker of voltage-gated Ca2+ channels in various tissues, and IC50 of Cd2+ for the channels is ~1 µM (Randall 1998Go), which is almost the same as that obtained in the present study. Because the sensitivity of Cd2+ to nonselective cation channels is very weak (Wallnöfer et al. 1989Go), Cd2+-dependent inhibition of slow DPs in taste cells is likely to be derived from a block of voltage-gated Ca2+ channels at the presynaptic axon terminals of taste disk.

Of antagonists tested for blocking 9 receptors of biogenic amines and peptides, only 2 types of antagonist, [D-Arg1, D-Trp7,9, Leu11]-substance P and L-703 606, for substance P NK1 receptor completely blocked the slow DPs in taste cells induced by PSN stimulation. The i. v. injection of substance P also elicited DPs and increased the membrane conductance in taste cells. Substance P is immunohistochemically found in the presynaptic axon terminals within the taste disks of the frog fungiform papillae (Hirata and Kanaseki 1987Go; Kuramoto 1988Go, Kusakabe et al. 1996Go). These findings suggest that a neurotransmitter candidate released from the presynaptic terminals of PSN in the taste disks is substance P.

Our previous studies (Sato et al. 2002Go) suggested that GP nerve–induced slow DPs are due to the opening of nonselective cation channels permeable to Na+ and K+ on the frog taste cell membrane. Nonselective cation channels of 30 pS are present in the proximal processes of frog taste cells (Fujiyama et al. 1993Go; Sato et al. 1995Go). In the present work, a potent blocker, fulfenamic acid, of nonselective cation channels on the postsynaptic membrane of taste cells at the gustatory efferent synapse completely blocked slow DPs. Because flufenamic acid is relatively insensitive to the voltage-gated Ca2+ channels in the presynaptic axon terminals (Hescheler and Schultz 1993Go), the slow DPs induced in taste cells are very likely to be blocked by binding flufenamic acid to the nonselective cation channels on the postsynaptic membrane.

The PSN efferent fibers innervating frog taste cells generate either the slow HPs accompanied by membrane conductance decrease under normoxia or the slow DPs accompanied by membrane conductance increase under hypoxia (Sato et al. 2002Go). Our studies indicate that both slow HPs and slow DPs have the same reversal potential of approximately –12 mV, are activated by substance P as a neurotransmitter candidate, and are induced by closing or opening the nonselective cation channels on the proximal processes of taste cells (Sato et al. 2002Go, 2004Go). However, it is not clear whether the same taste cells in the frog taste disk elicit both slow HPs under normoxia and slow DPs under hypoxia because a microelectrode inserted into a taste cell cannot maintain the stable intracellular recording for a long time. Slow HPs are obtained from ~85% of the whole taste cells tested under normoxia (Sato et al. 2004Go), suggesting that the remaining ~15% in taste cells which do not respond to PSN stimulation may not be innervated by the PSN efferent fibers or premature cells. In the present experiments, slow DPs are also obtained from ~85% of tested taste cells. These data do not support the possibility that a subset of taste cells in the frog taste disk evokes slow HPs under normoxia and another subset of taste cells evokes slow DPs under hypoxia. Another possible explanation is that almost every taste cell can generate both slow HPs in normoxia (frog venous PO2: ~23 mmHg [Prosser and Brown 1965Go; Wilson 1979Go]) and slow DPs in hypoxia (PO2 < 4.5 mmHg). What mechanism is involved in switching from slow HPs to slow DPs or vice versa? The exact mechanism is unknown. It is well known that when living organisms are encountered from normoxia to hypoxia, many types of O2-sensitive ion channels in organs are inactivated in various degrees to adapt the activity of the living organisms to hypoxia (López-Barneo et al. 2001Go). When activities of the frog's whole body are adapted to hypoxic situation, switching from slow HPs to slow DPs in taste cells in response to GP nerve stimulation is reasonable for decreasing gustatory responses under a lowered lingual tissue respiration. At gustatory afferent synaptic transmission, slow DPs in a presynaptic taste cell induced by PSN may exert the presynaptic inhibition (Eccles 1973Go; Ganong 2003Go), resulting in a decrease in gustatory neural responses. This can keep gustatory activity lower during reduced formation of adenosine triphosphate in the mitocondoria. It is supposed that after G protein–coupled substance P NK1 receptor (Otsuka and Yoshioka 1993Go; Bloom 1996Go) binds substance P under normoxia, nonselective cation channels on the taste cell are closed by phosphorylation via sequential events of cell-signal tansduction molecules (Sato et al. 2004Go). This may result in a generation of slow HPs in taste cells. Furthermore, one would suppose that the nonselective cation channels are opened by hypoxia-induced conformational changes in substance P NK1 receptors, cell-signal transduction molecules, or cation channels, resulting in a generation of the slow DPs accompanied by an increase in the membrane conductance.

It is concluded that PSN-induced slow DPs in frog taste cells under hypoxia are generated by opening the nonselective cation channels on the taste cells following a possible release of substance P from the presynaptic PSN axon terminals in taste disk and that generation of slow DPs under hypoxia is necessary for adapting the gustatory system to hypoxia.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Bloom FE. (1996) Neurotransmission and the central nervous system. In Hardman JG, Limbird LE, Molinoff PB, Ruddon RW, Gilman AG (Eds.). Goodman and Gilman's the pharmacological basis of therapeutics 9th ed (McGraw-Hill, New York) pp. 267–293.

Eccles JC. (1973) The understanding of the brain. (McGraw-Hill, New York).

Fujiyama R, Miyamoto T, Sato T. (1993) Non-selective cation channel in bullfrog taste cell membrane. NeuroReport 5:11–13.[Medline]

Ganong WF. (2003) Review of medical physiology, 21st ed. (McGraw-Hill, New York).

Hescheler J and Schultz G. (1993) Nonselective cation channels: physiological and pharmacological modulations of channel activity. In Siemen D and Hescheler J (Eds.). Nonselective cation channels: pharmacology, physiology and biophysics(Birkhäuser, Basel (Switzerland)) pp. 27–43.

Hirata K and Kanaseki T. (1987) Substance P-like immunoreactive fibers in the frog taste organs. Experientia 43:386–389.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Inoue K, Yamaai T, Kitada Y. (1992) Parasympathetic postganglionic nerve fibers in the fungiform papillae of the bullfrog, Rana catesbeiana. Brain Res 596:299–304.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Jaeger CB and Hillman DE. (1976) Morphology of gustatory organs. In Linás R and Precht W (Eds.). Frog neurobiology(Springer, Berlin (Germany)) pp. 587–606.

Katz B and Miledi R. (1965) The measurement of synaptic delay and the time course of acetylcholine release at the neuromuscular junction. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 161:483–495.[Medline]

Katz B and Miledi R. (1967) The timing of calcium action during neuromuscular transmission. J Physiol 189:535–544.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Kuramoto H. (1988) An immunohistological study of cellular and nervous elements in the taste organ of the bullfrog, Rana catesbeiana. Arch Histol Cytol 51:205–221.[Web of Science][Medline]

Kusakabe T, Kawakami T, Ono M, Sawada H, Takenaka T. (1996) Distribution of peptidergic nerve fibres in bullfrog lingual papillae demonstrated by a combination of double immunofluorescence labelling and a multiple dye filter. Histochem J 28:289–297.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

López-Barneo J, Pardal R, Ortega-Sáenz P. (2001) Cellular mechanisms of oxygen sensing. Annu Rev Physiol 63:259–287.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Mendell LM and Wall PD. (1964) Presynaptic hyperpolarization: a role for fine afferent fibres. J Physiol 172:274–294.[Free Full Text]

Nomura S, Muneoka Y, Kanno Y. (1975) The ultrastructure of taste organs of a frog (Rana catesbeiana)-three types of synapse and junctions between taste cells. Jpn J Oral Biol 17:371–384.

Otsuka M and Yoshioka K. (1993) Neurotransmitter functions of mammalian tachykinins. Physiol Rev 73:229–308.[Free Full Text]

Prosser CL and Brown FA Jr. (1965) Comparative animal physiology. 2nd ed (WB Saunders, Philadelphia (PA)).

Randall AD. (1998) The molecular basis of voltage-gated Ca2+ channel diversity: is it time for t? J Membr Biol 161:207–213.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Sato M. (1976) Physiology of the gustatory system. In Linás R and Precht W (Eds.). Frog neurobiology(Springer, Berlin (Germany)) pp. 575–587.

Sato T, Miyamoto T, Okada Y. (2002) Slow potentials in taste cells induced by frog glossopharyngeal nerve stimulation. Chem Senses 27:367–374.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Sato T, Nishishita K, Kato Y, Okada Y, Toda K. (2006) Tonic activity of parasympathetic efferent nerve fibers hyperpolarizes the resting membrane potential of frog taste cells. Chem Senses 31:307–313.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Sato T, Ohkusa M, Okada Y, Sasaki M. (1983) Topographical difference in taste organ density and its sensitivity of frog tongue. Comp Biochem Physiol A 76:233–239.

Sato T, Okada Y, Miyamoto T. (1995) Molecular mechanisms of gustatory transductions in frog taste cells. Prog Neurobiol 46:239–287.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Sato T, Okada Y, Miyazaki T, Kato Y, Toda K. (2005) Taste cell responses in the frog are modulated by parasympathetic efferent nerve fibers. Chem Senses 30:761–769.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Sato T, Okada Y, Toda K. (2004) Analysis of slow hyperpolarizing potentials in frog taste cells induced by glossopharyngeal nerve stimulation. Chem Senses 29:651–657.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Sato T, Toda K, Miyamoto T, Okada Y, Fujiyama R. (2000) The origin of slow potentials on the tongue surface induced by frog glossopharyngeal efferent fiber stimulation. Chem Senses 25:583–589.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Shepherd GM. (1994) Neurobiology. 3rd ed (Oxford University Press, New York).

Thorson TB. (1964) The partitioning of body water in Amphibia. Physiol Zool 37:395–399.[Medline]

Wallnöfer A, Cauvin C, Lategan TW, Rüegg UT. (1989) Differential blockage of agonist- and depolarization-induced 45Ca2+ influx in smooth muscle cells. Am J Physiol 257:C607–C611.

Wilson JA. (1979) Principles of animal physiology, 2nd ed. (Macmillan, New York).

Witt M. (1993) Ultrastructure of the taste disc in the red-bellied toad Bombiana orientalis (Discoglossidae, Salientia). Cell Tissue Res 272:59–70.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Yoshie S, Kanazawa H, Fujita T. (1996) A possibility of efferent innervation of the gustatory cell in the rat circumvallate taste bud. Arch Histol Cytol 59:479–484.[Web of Science][Medline]

Accepted 15 January 2007


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
32/4/329    most recent
bjm003v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sato, T.
Right arrow Articles by Toda, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sato, T.
Right arrow Articles by Toda, K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?