Chemical Senses Advance Access published online on April 2, 2007
Chemical Senses, doi:10.1093/chemse/bjm008
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The Olfactory Pathway of Decapod Crustaceans—An Invertebrate Model for Life-Long Neurogenesis
Department of Biology, Georgia State University, PO Box 4010, Atlanta, GA 30303, USA
Correspondence to be sent to: Manfred Schmidt, Department of Biology, Georgia State University, PO Box 4010, Atlanta, GA 30303, USA. e-mail: mschmidt{at}gsu.edu
 |
Abstract |
|---|
Top
Abstract
IntroductionThe first part of this review includes a short description of the cellular and morphological organization of the olfactory pathway of decapod crustaceans, followed by an overview of adult neurogenesis in this pathway focusing on the olfactory lobe (OL), the first synaptic relay in the brain. Adult neurogenesis in the central olfactory pathway has the following characteristics. 1) It is present in all the diverse species of decapod crustaceans so far studied. 2) In all these species, projection neurons (PNs), which have multiglomerular dendritic arborizations, are generated. 3) Neurons are generated by one round of symmetrical cell divisions of a small population of immediate precursor cells that are located in small proliferation zones at the inner margin of the respective soma clusters. 4) The immediate precursor cells in each soma cluster appear to be generated by repeated cell divisions of one or few neuronal stem cells that are located outside of the proliferation zone. 5) These neuronal stem cells are enclosed in a highly structured clump of small glial-like cells, which likely establishes a specific microenvironment and thus can be regarded as a stem cell niche. 6) Diverse internal and external factors, such as presence of olfactory afferents, age, season of the year, and living under constant and deprived conditions modulate the generation and/or survival of new neurons. In the second part of this review, I address the question why in decapod crustaceans adult neurogenesis persists in the visual and olfactory pathways of the brain but is lacking in all other mechanosensory–chemosensory pathways. Due to the indeterminate growth of most adult decapod crustaceans, new sensory neurons of all modalities (olfaction and chemo-, mechano-, and photoreception) are continuously added during adulthood and provide an ever-increasing sensory input to all primary sensory neuropils of the central nervous system. From these facts, I conclude that adult neurogenesis in the brain cannot simply be a mechanism to accommodate increasing sensory input and propose instead that it is causally linked to the specific "topographic logic" of information processing implemented in the sensory neuropils serving different modalities. For the presumptive odotopic type of information processing in the OL, new multiglomerular PNs allow interconnection of novel combinations of spatially unrelated input channels (glomeruli), whose simultaneous activation by specific odorants is the basis of odor coding. Thus, adult neurogenesis could provide a unique way to increase the resolution of odorant quality coding and allow adaptation of the olfactory system of these long-lived animals to ever-changing odor environments.
Key words: arthropod, decapod crustacean, local interneurons, proliferation, projection neurons
|
Introduction |
|---|
Contrary to beliefs held throughout most of the last century, neurogenesis persists in the brain of adult animals from various taxa. Although widespread in the animal kingdom, adult neurogenesis in each species only occurs in one or very few, specific brain areas, and only one or very few neuronal types in each of these areas are subject to it. In this sense, neurogenesis is the rare exception and not the rule among the numerous neuronal populations of the adult brain, or even the central nervous system (CNS). In this review, I offer an explanation for the sparse occurrence of adult neurogenesis in the brain of decapod crustaceans. Hopefully, this hypothesis can also shed some light on other systems in which adult neurogenesis exists among certain neuronal populations of higher brain regions—the olfactory bulb and hippocampus of the mammalian brain, and the mushroom bodies of the insect brain.
Neurogenesis in the adult brain occurs in most of the main classes of vertebrates, including elasmobranchs (Leonard et al. 1978
), teleost fishes (Raymond and Easter 1983; Zupanc 1999, 2001; Byrd and Brunjes 2002; Zupanc et al. 2005), amphibians (Polenov and Chetverukhin 1993), reptiles (Pérez-Cañellas and García-Verdugo 1996; Font et al. 2002), songbirds (Goldman 1998), and mammals (reviews: Gross 2000; Ming and Song 2005; Christie and Cameron 2006; Gheusi and Lledo 2007). Among these, mammals are by far the best analyzed group. Across various rodent and primate species including humans, adult neurogenesis was consistently demonstrated in only 2 brain areas, the subventricular zone/olfactory bulb and the dentate gyrus of the hippocampus (Eriksson et al. 1998; Kornack and Rakic 2001; Ming and Song 2005; Christie and Cameron 2006). Adult neurogenesis in the mammalian olfactory bulb is reviewed in another paper in this issue (Gheusi and Lledo 2007). Among invertebrates, mainly arthropods have been analyzed with respect to the occurrence of adult neurogenesis, and within arthropods the analysis is restricted to only several species of insects and decapod crustaceans, leaving numerous taxa and countless species untested. Although restricted to only relatively few species in each case, these analyses reveal a consistent picture of adult neurogenesis in the brain of both insects and decapod crustaceans. In insect brains, adult neurogenesis only occurs among the Kenyon cells of the mushroom bodies, which are higher order multimodal integration centers receiving their most prominent input from the antennal lobes, the primary olfactory neuropils (Cayre et al. 1994, 1996; Gu et al. 1999; Dufour and Gadenne 2006). Adult neurogenesis in the mushroom bodies is lacking in several insect species (Fahrbach et al. 1995; Cayre et al. 1996) and lasts only several days into adulthood (Gu et al. 1999). Adult neurogenesis in insects is reviewed in detail in another paper contained in this issue (Cayre et al. 2007).
In decapod crustaceans, adult neurogenesis occurs only in 2 brain areas: the optic lobes (Schmidt 1997; Sullivan and Beltz 2005b) and the central olfactory pathway (Schmidt 2002a; Beltz and Sandeman 2003). Although evidence for adult neurogenesis in the optic lobes so far has been obtained for only 2 species (Carcinus maenas, Cherax destructor) and has not been analyzed in detail (Schmidt 1997; Sullivan and Beltz 2005b), evidence for adult neurogenesis in the central olfactory pathway has been obtained for all 9 species that have been analyzed, which represent the major infraorders of decapod crustaceans: Caridea, shrimp: Sicyonia brevirostris; Achelata, spiny lobster: Panulirus argus; Homarida, clawed lobster: Homarus americanus; Astacida, crayfish: C. destructor, Procambarus clarkii; Anomala, hermit crab: Pagurus bernhardus; and Brachyura, true crabs: C. maenas, Cancer pagurus, Libinia emarginata (Schmidt 1997, 2001, 2007; Sandeman et al. 1998; Harzsch, Miller et al. 1999; Schmidt and Harzsch 1999; Beltz et al. 2001; Hansen and Schmidt 2001, 2004; Song et al. 2005; Sullivan and Beltz 2005a, 2005b; Sullivan et al. 2007). Several aspects of adult neurogenesis in the central olfactory pathway of decapod crustaceans have been studied in more detail in some of the above-mentioned species. These include the fate (neuronal differentiation, apoptosis) of the newly generated cells; the regulation of adult neurogenesis by internal and external factors, such as age, afferent input, captivity, and yearly seasons; and the identification of putative neuronal stem cells at the basis of proliferation. In this review, I provide a short overview on each of these themes, and based on this I propose a hypothesis to explain why adult neurogenesis occurs in the olfactory pathway but not in the many other mechanosensory–chemosensory pathways of the decapod crustacean CNS.
|
The olfactory pathway of decapod crustaceans |
|---|
The general neuroanatomical organization of the olfactory pathway of decapod crustaceans is very similar to that of insects (Schachtner et al. 2005
) (Figure 1A). Sensory input to the olfactory pathway is provided by an array of specialized sensilla, called aesthetascs, which exclusively occur on the lateral flagellum of the antennules (first antennae) (Marcus 1911; Helm 1928; Laverack and Ardill 1965; Grünert and Ache 1988). The aesthetascs have ultrastructural features identifying them as olfactory sensilla (Laverack and Ardill 1965; Grünert and Ache 1988; Gleeson et al. 1996), they respond to a range of physiologically relevant odorants (Schmiedel-Jakob et al. 1989; Michel et al. 1993; Steullet, Cate, Michel, et al. 2000), and they drive behavioral responses to pheromones (Gleeson 1982; Horner and Derby 2005; Johnson and Atema 2005; Shabani et al. 2006). Aesthetascs are unique among arthropod sensilla in having a large number (40–500) of primary sensory neurons packaged into each sensillum (Marcus 1911; Laverack and Ardill 1965; Ghiradella et al. 1968; Snow 1973; Grünert and Ache 1988; Gleeson et al. 1996; Steullet, Cate, Michel, et al. 2000). This unusually high number of sensory neurons (olfactory receptor neurons or ORNs) combined in one sensillum suggests that the aesthetascs are specialized for providing a multitude of information-coding channels as required for the representation of the highly complex, multidimensional odor environment (Laurent 2002; Wilson and Mainen 2006).
|
Aesthetascs increase in number during adulthood and also undergo a slow "longitudinal" turnover (Sandeman et al. 1998
; Steullet, Cate, and Derby 2000; Harrison, Cate, Swanson, et al. 2001; Derby et al. 2003). Both phenomena are tightly associated with molting, the process whereby these animals grow through shedding the exoskeleton. With each molt, new aesthetascs are born at the proximal edge of the aesthetasc array, and in consecutive molts they are slowly and discontinuously translocated distally, and finally they reach the very tip of the flagellum and are lost with the following molt. Functional maturation of newly generated ORNs in P. argus lasts several months, and the life span of ORNs is probably more than a year (Steullet, Cate, and Derby 2000; Harrison, Cate, Swanson, et al. 2001).
The ORNs innervating the aesthetascs project their axons into the brain where they terminate in the elongated, wedge-shaped glomeruli of the olfactory lobe (OL), the most prominent neuropil of the deutocerebrum (Sandeman and Denburg 1976; Mellon et al. 1989; Mellon and Munger 1990; Schmidt and Ache 1992; Mellon and Alones 1993; Sandeman DC and Sandeman RE 1994) (Figures 1A and 3). Most ORNs innervate only one glomerulus of the OL (Schmidt and Ache 1992; Mellon and Alones 1993), and the topographical arrangement of the aesthetascs on the lateral flagellum is not preserved in the projections of their ORNs to the OL glomeruli (Mellon and Munger 1990), suggesting that the OL has an odotopic rather than somatotopic representation. The number of glomeruli per OL varies substantially between different species, ranging from approximately 150 to 1300, with marine species generally having a higher number of glomeruli than freshwater or semiterrestrial species (Blaustein et al. 1988; Schmidt and Ache 1992; Beltz et al. 2003; Schachtner et al. 2005). The OL is closely associated with some other neuropils, of which the accessory lobe (AL) is the largest in some infraorders (Achelata, Homarida, Astacida, Thalassinida) (Sandeman and Scholtz 1995; Sullivan and Beltz 2004) (Figure 1A). The AL is also organized into glomeruli but does not receive any direct sensory input. Together, these neuropils form the olfactory deutocerebrum representing the first stage of the central olfactory pathway (Sandeman et al. 1992; Schachtner et al. 2005). Two types of neurons constitute the olfactory deutocerebrum, and the somata of these neuronal types are segregated neatly into 2 distinct soma clusters. One type is local interneurons with arbors restricted to deutocerebral neuropils and somata forming the medial soma cluster (MC; cluster 9/11 according to the terminology of Sandeman et al. 1992) (Figures 1A,B and 2B,J). The second type is projection neurons (PNs) with arborizations either in the OL (OL-PNs) or AL (AL-PNs), an axon projecting to the lateral protocerebrum, and somata forming the lateral soma cluster (LC; cluster 10 according to the terminology of Sandeman et al. 1992) (Figures 1A,B and 2A). LNs that mainly arborize in the OL come in 2 morphological types (core neurons and rim neurons), both of which innervate most if not all glomeruli (Schachtner et al. 2005). The OL-PNs have multiglomerular arborization patterns with dense, bush-like branching in only some (3–10) OL glomeruli and very sparse branching in many others (from 10% to 80% of all glomeruli) (Wachowiak and Ache 1994; Schmidt and Ache 1996b).
|
|
The second level of the central olfactory pathway is constituted by neuropils of the lateral protocerebrum located in the eyestalk ganglia, which are the target of the PNs: the hemiellipsoid body and the medulla terminalis (Mellon et al. 1992
; Sullivan and Beltz 2001, 2004; McKinzie et al. 2003). In species lacking an AL, the OL-PNs primarily target the hemiellipsoid body (Sullivan and Beltz 2004), whereas in species that have a prominent AL, the OL-PNs instead terminate in the medulla terminalis and the hemiellipsoid body receives innervation by AL-PNs (Sullivan and Beltz 2001; McKinzie et al. 2003). The neuroanatomy of the eyestalk ganglia is very complex and only partially analyzed (Blaustein et al. 1988). Both medulla terminalis and hemiellipsoid body appear to be mainly comprising different types of local interneurons, some of which have their somata in a cluster that is located in the vicinity of the hemiellipsoid body and is named HBC (Schmidt 1997; Schmidt and Harzsch 1999; Hansen and Schmidt 2001, 2004) (Figure 1B) or soma cluster A (Sullivan and Beltz 2005a).
It is noteworthy that the aesthetascs occur in a stereotypical arrangement with various other sensilla types (guard setae, companion setae, and asymmetric setae), all of which appear to be bimodal containing mechano- and chemosensory receptor neurons (Laverack 1964; Derby 1982; Spencer and Linberg 1986; Cate and Derby 2001; Schmidt and Derby 2005). The afferents of these "nonaesthetasc" sensilla target another neuropil of the deutocerebrum, the lateral antennular neuropil (LAN), which also contains major arborizations of antennular motoneurons and thus represents the antennular sensory-motor center (Schmidt et al. 1992; Schmidt and Ache 1993, 1996a; Roye 1994). Due to the strict coexistence of particular nonaesthetasc sensilla with the aesthetascs, the continuous increase in the number of sensilla and receptor neurons during adulthood and the slow longitudinal turnover along the lateral flagellum not only applies to the aesthetascs and the ORNs but also to these accompanying sensilla and their chemo- and mechanoreceptor neurons.
|
Neurogenesis in the brain throughout postlarval life |
|---|
Decapod crustaceans, after completion of embryonic development in the egg, transform into larvae that usually are free-swimming planktonic organisms (Williamson 1982
; Scholtz 2000) and only in few taxa, such as crayfish, remain in the egg (Sandeman R and Sandeman D 1991). After going through several, sometimes as many as 17 (Palinuridae: Kittaka et al. 2005) morphologically distinct larval stages, the animals molt into first juveniles, which closely resemble adults in morphology (Felder et al. 1985; Sandeman R and Sandeman D 1991). Through successive molts with ever-increasing intervals, these juvenile animals incrementally grow in size until they reach adulthood, defined as the state of sexual maturity (Hartnoll 1982; Conan et al. 2001). Afterward, most species continue to grow by further molts throughout their entire adult life (indeterminate growth); only some species, such as the brachyuran crab L. emarginata, stop molting and growing after a terminal molt (Sullivan and Beltz 2005a). As the other sensory pathways, the visual and the central olfactory pathways, usually develop and differentiate in the embryo; in crayfish, the central olfactory pathway differentiates in postembryonic stages (Helluy et al. 1993; Harzsch et al. 1998; Harzsch, Benton, et al. 1999; Harzsch, Miller, et al. 1999; Benton and Beltz 2002). In embryonic development, neurogenesis is widespread in the brain and in other parts of the CNS and, as in insects, is based on the activity of typical neuroblasts (NBs) (Hartenstein et al. 1987; Truman and Bate 1988; Scholtz 1992; Zacharias et al. 1993; Harzsch and Dawirs 1994; Doe and Skeath 1996; Harzsch et al. 1998; Harzsch, Benton, et al. 1999; Harzsch 2001, 2003). NBs are large precursor cells that in a series of asymmetric cell divisions renew themselves and give rise to midsized ganglion mother cells (GMCs). These in turn divide once symmetrically and give rise to 2 primordial neurons (a possible exception to this has been reported for the embryonic lobster brain by Benton and Beltz 2002). Throughout larval development, neurogenesis in the brain and in other parts of the CNS continues in a similar way (Harzsch and Dawirs 1994, 1996a, 1996b; Harzsch et al. 1998). But with the metamorphosis to the first juvenile stage, neurogenesis ceases in most brain areas except the central olfactory pathway (Harzsch and Dawirs 1996b) and the optic lobes (Harzsch and Dawirs 1996a). Thus, from the first juveniles throughout the juvenile and the entire adult life, neurogenesis continues in these 2 areas of the brain. However, neurogenesis in the central olfactory pathway differs between early juveniles and adults in the number of proliferating cells, the temporal dynamics of cell divisions, and its regulation by intrinsic factors (Schmidt 2001; Goergen et al. 2002; Song et al. 2005; Song C-K, Johnstone LM, Schmidt M, Derby CD, Edwards DH, unpublished results), indicating that the neurogenic processes in these stages need to be analyzed separately before general conclusions can be derived. A further confounding effect is that in many species, the transition between juvenile and the sexually mature adult stage is not accompanied by distinct morphological changes (Conan et al. 2001). Thus, in many studies on adult neurogenesis, late juvenile animals have also been included, under the premise that they do not differ from adults in gross morphology or the specific and quantifiable aspects of neurogenesis. This review will focus on neurogenesis in the central olfactory pathway of adult (including late juvenile) decapod crustaceans. |
Occurrence and localization of adult neurogenesis in the central olfactory pathway |
|---|
Adult neurogenesis in the central olfactory pathway of decapod crustaceans was demonstrated by counting neuronal somata or axons (Schmidt 1997
; Sandeman et al. 1998) and by in vivo labeling with the S-phase marker 5-bromo-2'-deoxyuridine (BrdU) (Schmidt 1997, 2001, 2007; Sandeman et al. 1998; Harzsch, Miller, et al. 1999; Schmidt and Harzsch 1999; Beltz et al. 2001; Hansen and Schmidt 2001, 2004; Sullivan and Beltz 2005a, 2005b; Sullivan et al. 2007). Counting neurons showed in the shore crab C. maenas and in the Australian crayfish C. destructor that the number of PNs increases substantially (by more than 100%) and in a linear fashion throughout the life span of the animals (Schmidt 1997; Sandeman et al. 1998). In C. destructor, LNs also increase in number, although less substantially (Sandeman et al. 1998). By in vivo labeling with BrdU in these and other species (as detailed above), the presence of small groups of proliferating cells in soma clusters of the central olfactory pathway was consistently demonstrated (Figure 1A,B). Constant across all tested species is the presence of groups of proliferating cells in the LCs comprised by the somata of deutocerebral PNs (Figure 2A,C,E,G) (Schmidt 1997, 2001; Sandeman et al. 1998; Harzsch, Miller, et al. 1999; Schmidt and Harzsch 1999; Beltz et al. 2001; Hansen and Schmidt 2001, 2004; Sullivan and Beltz 2005a, 2005b). In all species of Reptantia (spiny and clawed lobsters, crayfish, hermit crabs, and true crabs), which are evolutionary more advanced than the Natantia (shrimps) (Sandeman et al. 1993), groups of proliferating cells are also present in other soma clusters of the central olfactory pathway: in the MCs comprised by somata of deutocerebral LNs (Figure 2B), in the HBCs (or cluster As) comprised by protocerebral LNs (Figure 2F), or in both (Schmidt 1997, 2001, 2007; Sandeman et al. 1998; Harzsch, Miller, et al. 1999; Schmidt and Harzsch 1999; Beltz et al. 2001; Hansen and Schmidt 2001, 2004; Sullivan and Beltz 2005a, 2005b; Sullivan et al. 2007). A hypothesis linking the occurrence of proliferation in these soma clusters to the presence or absence of a well-developed AL (Schmidt and Harzsch 1999) has recently been invalidated by the discovery of proliferation in the MC and the HBC of a brachyuran crab species (L. emarginata) (Sullivan and Beltz 2005a).
Except in protocerebral cluster A of L. emarginata (Sullivan and Beltz 2005a), only one group of proliferating cells is present in a soma cluster, its position within the soma cluster is invariant, and the number of cells it comprises is very small (ca. 20–100) (Schmidt 1997, 2001, 2007; Harzsch, Miller, et al. 1999; Schmidt and Harzsch 1999; Hansen and Schmidt 2001, 2004; Sullivan and Beltz 2005a, 2005b) in comparison to the total number of neuronal somata (10 000–200 000) in that cluster (Schmidt and Ache 1996b; Schmidt 1997; Sandeman et al. 1998). Furthermore, this small area, which is always located at the inner surface of the respective soma cluster close to the neuropil innervated by the neurons contained in the cluster, can also be identified in tissue sections stained with cytological or immunocytochemical techniques (Figure 2A–D). Cells in this area differ in several characteristic ways (i.e., smaller size and less spherical shape, darker staining with methylene blue, and lack of neuropeptide-like immunoreactivity) from the neuronal somata in the surround (Schmidt 1997, 2001, 2007; Sullivan and Beltz 2005a, 2005b; Sullivan et al. 2007), and at each time point some of them are in mitosis (Schmidt 1997, 2001, 2007). Based on these findings, the area containing the group of BrdU-positive cells in each of the soma clusters showing proliferation has been identified as a morphologically specialized proliferation zone. In this organizational aspect, adult neurogenesis in the central olfactory pathway of decapod crustaceans parallels adult neurogenesis in the mammalian brain, which is also based on proliferation taking place in morphologically specialized germinal areas, the subventricular zone (generation of new local interneurons of the olfactory bulb: Luskin 1993; Doetsch et al. 1999), and the subgranular zone (generation of new granule cells of the hippocampus: Seri et al. 2001, 2004; Christie and Cameron 2006). However, in contrast to decapod crustaceans where proliferation is concentrated in very small areas, the germinal areas in the mammalian brain are extended layers in which proliferation is dispersed.
|
Fate of proliferating cells: long-term survival, apoptosis, and neuronal maturation |
|---|
BrdU pulse-chase experiments with short (days) and long (months) survival times were used to study the fate of the proliferating cells in the soma clusters of the central olfactory pathway (Schmidt 1997, 2001
; Harzsch, Miller, et al. 1999; Beltz et al. 2001; Sullivan and Beltz 2005a, 2005b). Counting BrdU-positive cells after different survival times showed that their number doubles within about 2 weeks and then remains constant, indicating that all cells that are labeled (and thus are in the S-phase of their cell cycle at the time of BrdU injection) divide once but do not undergo further rounds of cell divisions (Schmidt 1997, 2001). Even after many months (up to 14), numerous BrdU-positive cells remain detectable in the respective soma clusters, suggesting that most if not all the daughter cells arising in this round of cell divisions survive for a very long time, possibly the entire life span of the animal (Figure 2H,J) (Schmidt 2001; Sullivan and Beltz 2005a, 2005b).
Evidence for apoptotic cell death has been obtained in some studies of the fate of the proliferating cells (Sandeman et al. 1998; Harzsch, Miller, et al. 1999; Schmidt 2001). Two conflicting distribution patterns of apoptotic cells have been reported, with the results dependent on the method of identification: TUNEL labeling versus observation of condensed, pyknotic nuclei in tissue sections stained with methylene blue or labeled with the nuclear marker Hoechst 33258. TUNEL-positive cells were found in moderate numbers and were scattered throughout the entire soma cluster without any preferred location (Sandeman et al. 1998; Harzsch, Miller, et al. 1999). In contrast, condensed, pyknotic nuclei were found in only very small numbers (1–6) and were restricted in their distribution to the immediate vicinity of the proliferation zone of the respective soma cluster (Figure 2D, inset) (Schmidt 2001). In the LC of H. americanus, nuclei darkly stained by methylene blue were equated with nuclei of TUNEL-positive cells (Harzsch, Miller, et al. 1999), but in a recent morphological study, nuclei with similar appearance in the LC of P. argus have been identified as nuclei of a novel type of glial cell (Schmidt 2007). It thus seems likely that as in many other systems (Charriaut-Marlangue and Ben-Ari 1995; Stähelin et al. 1998; Tateyama et al. 1998), TUNEL labeling performed in the central olfactory pathway of decapod crustaceans produced false-positive results that need to be critically reevaluated. The occurrence of some condensed, pyknotic nuclei in the immediate vicinity of proliferation zones suggests that only very few of the newly generated cells undergo programed cell death shortly after their birth. A similar mode of interplay between proliferation and programed cell death appears to occur in both areas of adult neurogenesis in the mammalian CNS (Morshead and Van der Kooy 1992; Gage et al. 1998).
BrdU pulse-chase experiments with longer survival times have revealed that newly generated cells leave the proliferation zones within about 4 weeks and that thereafter they slowly and continuously move further toward the periphery of the respective soma cluster (Schmidt 1997, 2001; Harzsch, Miller, et al. 1999; Beltz et al. 2001; Sullivan and Beltz 2005a, 2005b). After about 3 months, they reach areas of the respective soma clusters, which almost exclusively comprising somata of morphologically mature neurons (Figure 2H,J) (Schmidt 2001; Sullivan and Beltz 2005a, 2005b). Maturity of the cells in these regions is indicated by the expression of specific neuropeptides (MC: FMRFamide, substance P, orcokinin, allatostatin; LC: SIFamide) and in the case of the LC of P. argus also by receiving innervation from descending giant neurons with FMRFamide- and substance P-like immunoreactivity (Sandeman et al. 1990; Schmidt and Ache 1994, 1997; Yasuda et al. 2004; Yasuda-Kamatani and Yasuda 2006; Sullivan et al. 2007). Neuronal differentiation and maturation of cells born in the MC and the LC has been demonstrated directly by combining BrdU pulse-chase experiments with neuron-specific labeling (Schmidt 2001; Sullivan and Beltz 2005a, 2005b; Sullivan et al. 2007). In one approach, expression of the above mentioned neuropeptides was examined in double-labeling experiments. These experiments revealed that newly generated cells in the MC of P. argus and in the LC of C. destructor and L. emarginata mature into neurons within 3–6 months and that populations of neurons in the MC expressing different neuropeptides mature at different times (Figure 2I,K,L) (Schmidt 2001; Sullivan and Beltz 2005a, 2005b; Sullivan et al. 2007). In another approach, backfills of PNs with biocytin or fluorescent dextrans were performed in double-labeling experiments (Schmidt and Demuth 1998; Sullivan and Beltz 2005b). These experiments confirmed neuronal maturation in the time frame of several months and demonstrated that OL-PNs and AL-PNs are generated in the LC of adult C. destructor (Sullivan and Beltz 2005b). No evidence currently exists for the differentiation of other cell types, in particular glial cells, from BrdU-positive cells in the proliferation zones, although glial markers have been used in double-labeling experiments (Sullivan and Beltz 2005b; Schmidt 2007; Sullivan et al. 2007).
|
Origin of proliferating cells: identification of putative neuronal stem cells |
|---|
Neurogenesis in the brain of adult decapod crustaceans differs substantially from neurogenesis in the CNS of embryos and larvae with respect to the size and distribution of nuclei labeled after a single application of BrdU, suggesting that adult neurogenesis might be based on other neuronal stem cells than embryonic and larval neurogenesis. As detailed above, neurogenesis in the embryonic and larval CNS of decapod crustaceans is based on the proliferative activity of typical NBs. Single applications of BrdU have consistently labeled small groups of closely associated nuclei with substantially different sizes, which comprise one large nucleus of a NB, several smaller nuclei of GMCs, and some even smaller nuclei of primordial neurons (Scholtz 1992
; Harzsch and Dawirs 1994, 1996a; Harzsch et al. 1998; Harzsch, Benton, et al. 1999; Harzsch 2001, 2003).
In contrast to the situation in embryos and larvae, a single injection of BrdU in adults usually labels one compact group of nuclei within the proliferation zones (as detailed above), and these nuclei do not substantially vary in size (Figure 2C–G) (Schmidt 2001, 2007). Based on the fact that the BrdU-positive cells in the proliferation zone are the immediate precursors of neurons and give rise to them by one round of symmetrical cell divisions, they have been interpreted as equivalent to GMCs in the CNS of embryonic insects and decapod crustaceans (Schmidt 2001). This leaves open the question how these cells are generated or replenished, made even more pressing by the fact that after survival times of more than 4 weeks no BrdU-positive cells are retained in the proliferation zones (Figure 2H,J) (Schmidt 2001; Sullivan and Beltz 2005b). Recently, the problem of identifying the neuronal stem cells at the basis of adult neurogenesis in the olfactory midbrain has been tackled in P. argus and P. clarkii with 2 different approaches. These yielded different results and have led to contrasting conclusions about the nature of the putative neuronal stem cells and their cell cycle properties.
In P. argus, multiple BrdU injection over a time period of about 2 days were used in an attempt to label putative neuronal stem cells that are not labeled by single injections of BrdU because their mitoses may be timed differently (Schmidt 2002b, 2003, 2007). In these experiments, single or very few additional nuclei in an invariant position close to the proliferation zones of LC and MC were consistently labeled by BrdU (Figure 2M,N). These "extra" BrdU-positive nuclei were significantly larger than nuclei of neurons or BrdU-positive cells in the proliferation zones. Because the defining morphological feature of NBs in embryonic neurogenesis in the Tetraconata (insects and crustaceans) is being larger than their progeny, it has been proposed that these large extra BrdU-positive nuclei represent "putative adult NBs." Only one putative adult NB is present in each soma cluster. It is enclosed in a highly organized clump of small cells (Figure 2O–Q), which connects to the proliferation zone by a tube-like structure expressing phosphorylated histone 3-like immunoreactivity (Figure 2M,N). Cells in the clumps share morphological and immunocytochemical characteristics with newly identified putative glial cells in the soma clusters but clearly differ from another type of glial cells that surround the neuropils of the olfactory midbrain and were previously identified based on the expression of histamine- and glutamine synthetase–like (GS-like) immunoreactivity (Orona et al. 1990; Linser et al. 1997).
In adult P. clarkii, a single 6-h long exposure to BrdU labeled not only groups of nuclei in the proliferations zones of the LC and MC but also a string of isolated nuclei extending out from each of the soma clusters toward the ventral surface of the AL (Sullivan et al. 2005, 2007). The strings of nuclei are embedded in strands of material expressing GS-like immunoreactivity, and the strands extending from the LC and MC originate in a clump of small somata that also express GS-like immunoreactivity and hence have been identified as glial cells. Only prolonged exposure to BrdU (10–14 days) labeled few nuclei located within the clumps of small cells, and based on these results these cells have been interpreted as very slowly dividing neuronal stem cells of glial identity (Sullivan et al. 2005, 2007). In juvenile P. clarkii, a single 24-h long exposure to BrdU yielded very similar results with respect to the identification of strings of BrdU-positive nuclei extending from the proliferations zones of the LC and MC, and labeling with anti-GS and anti-tubulin also led to the identification of a clump of small cells at the juncture of the strings originating in the LC and MC (Song et al. 2005; Song C-K, Johnstone LM, Schmidt M, Derby CD, Edwards DH, unpublished results).
The results obtained in adult P. argus have been interpreted as evidence that single adult NBs are the neuronal stem cells at the basis of adult neurogenesis in the olfactory midbrain. Based on the available evidence, it has been proposed that these putative adult NBs undergo rapid asymmetric divisions in which they self-renew and generate one daughter cell—a GMC—that translocates to the adjacent proliferation zone where it undergoes one symmetrical cell division that lasts much longer (in the range of several days) and generates 2 primordial neurons. Thus, adult neurogenesis in the brain of P. argus appears to have a very similar cellular basis as neurogenesis in the CNS of embryos and larvae and might therefore be viewed as a continuation of these early neurogenic events. Similarly, neurogenesis in the mushroom bodies of adult insects also appears to be a scaled down direct continuation of neurogenesis in larval and pupal development of the mushroom bodies. Two or more large NBs located in different aspects of the Kenyon cell soma cluster (depending on the species) give rise to smaller GMCs by asymmetrical divisions, and these in turn divide once symmetrically to generate 2 neurons (Cayre et al. 1994, 1996; Gu et al. 1999; Dufour and Gadenne 2006). In contrast, the results obtained in adult P. clarkii have been interpreted as evidence that specialized cells of glial identity are the neuronal stem cells. These cells supposedly divide extremely slowly, and their progeny migrate along a strand of glial fibers to the respective proliferation zones of the LC and MC where they divide further. This scenario is highly reminiscent of the cellular processes underlying adult neurogenesis in the subventricular zone/olfactory bulb of mammals, where the neuronal stem cells are of glial identity, divide very slowly, and produce progeny that migrate along a path established by glial cells (the rostral migratory stream) to their final destination, the olfactory bulb (Doetsch et al. 1999; Doetsch 2003; Garcia et al. 2004). Obviously, the data sets obtained for P. argus and P. clarkii are incongruent as they lead to mutually exclusive conclusions about the cellular identity of the neuronal stem cells and their cell cycle properties. Because both species are closely related (both belong to the order Decapoda within the class Malacostraca) and share many features of adult neurogenesis (occurrence of proliferation zones in similar positions in the same soma clusters, generation of the same types of neurons with similar time frames for neuronal maturation), it seems highly unlikely that adult neurogenesis in these species is indeed based on different types of neuronal stem cells. This strongly suggests that the current data sets are incomplete and that more experimental work is needed to resolve the current controversy.
In spite of these differences, the results of studies on P. argus and P. clarkii conform in one important aspect, the close association of the presumptive neuronal stem cells with a clump of small cells of glial identity (Schmidt 2002b, 2003, 2007; Sullivan et al. 2005, 2007; Song et al. 2005; Song C-K, Johnstone LM, Schmidt M, Derby CD, Edwards DH, unpublished results). The clumps of cells can be interpreted as structures that provide a specific microenvironment for maintaining the proliferative and self-renewal capacity of the putative neuronal stem cells. Thus, they seem to constitute "stem cell niches" as they have recently also been identified in the neurogenic regions of the adult mammalian brain, the subventricular and the subgranular zone (Palmer et al. 2000; Alvarez-Buylla and Lim 2004; Seri et al. 2004; Ma et al. 2005). It seems likely that in the context of adult neurogenesis in the decapod crustacean brain, such stem cell niches are required to maintain the proliferative and self-renewal potential of the putative adult neuronal stem cells for the entire life time of the animals, which is on the scale of years to decades (Farmer 1973; Belchier et al. 1998; Sheehy et al. 1999; Bluhm and Brey 2001). This is in stark contrast to the situation in the embryonic and larval CNS of insects and crustaceans, where NBs are active for only some days or weeks and die by apoptosis after a predetermined number of cell divisions (about 50) (Bate 1976; Hartenstein et al. 1987; Bello et al. 2003) and in the mushroom bodies of adult insects where the NBs remain active for only several days into adulthood (Gu et al. 1999). In both cases, similar stem cell niches for the NBs have not been reported to date.
|
Regulation of adult neurogenesis by internal and external factors |
|---|
Adult neurogenesis in the mammalian brain is modulated by diverse internal factors such as hormonal status, age, physical activity, and presence and activity of ORNs, but also by a host of external influences such as stress, dominance hierarchy formation, learning situations, and environmental richness (Ming and Song 2005
). Adult neurogenesis in the mushroom bodies of insects is controlled by hormonal status (Cayre et al. 1994, 1997) and by environmental richness (Lomassese et al. 2000).
Adult neurogenesis in the central olfactory pathway of decapod crustaceans is also modulated by diverse factors. One factor is the presence of ORNs. Unilateral ablation of the olfactory sensilla (or the appendage bearing them, the lateral flagellum) in C. destructor caused a substantial decrease in the number of PNs and LNs on the affected side accompanied by a higher number of apoptotic cells (see critique of method above) than on the intact side (Sandeman et al. 1988). The effect of unilateral ablation of the lateral flagellum on the number of BrdU-positive cells in the proliferation zones of LC and HBC of C. maenas was also examined (Hansen and Schmidt 2001). By manipulating the relative times of ablation and BrdU injection, it was shown that unilateral ablation of the lateral flagellum negatively affects the generation of new cells from precursors (putative NBs) but also the survival of newly generated, postmitotic cells in both soma clusters. The effect of the unilateral ablations on the survival of postmitotic cells was lateralized, but the proliferation of neuronal precursors was impaired bilaterally. The latter finding and the influence of ORN ablation on proliferation in the HBC cannot be explained by a direct influence of the presence or activity of ORN afferents on proliferation among cells that eventually will integrate into the neuropil innervated by these afferents. Instead, these observations suggest that some effects of ORN ablation on neurogenesis in the central olfactory pathway are indirect and therefore likely mediated by hormones or other far ranging signals.
The effect of age, season, and captivity on adult neurogenesis in LC and HBC was examined in C. maenas (Hansen and Schmidt 2004). All these factors differentially modulated neurogenesis in both soma clusters. With increasing age (measured as carapace width), the number of proliferating cells significantly decreased in the LC but remained almost constant in the HBC. The number of proliferating cells in both soma clusters showed substantial seasonal variations with 2 peaks (spring and late summer) in the LC and one peak (early summer) in the HBC. The number of proliferating cells in both soma clusters was significantly lower during autumn and winter than during spring and summer. Keeping the animals in captivity for 3 months under constant and impoverished conditions caused an overall decrease in the number of proliferating cells in both soma clusters but did not eliminate the seasonal changes in either of them. These data suggest that proliferation in LC and HBC of C. maenas is regulated independently and that it is controlled by an endogenous circannual rhythm.
Social interactions, enriched or impoverished living conditions, and circadian rhythm affect neurogenesis in the central olfactory pathway of crayfish, by altering proliferation and/or survival of neuronal precursor cells (Sandeman R and Sandeman D 2000; Goergen et al. 2002; Song et al. 2005, Song C-K, Johnstone LM, Schmidt M, Derby CD, Edwards DH, unpublished results). However, these studies were exclusively focused on very young juveniles, in which neurogenesis in the central olfactory pathway appears to have very different temporal properties than in adults (see above), and therefore they are not further reviewed here.
|
Why have adult neurogenesis in olfactory and not in other sensory pathways of the decapod crustacean CNS? |
|---|
The specific organization of the numerous peripheral and central sensory pathways and their unique mode of indeterminate growth throughout adulthood make decapod crustaceans an attractive animal model to address the question why adult neurogenesis in the CNS is restricted to certain areas—here the olfactory and visual pathways. This question addresses a basic issue of adult neurogenesis because it does not have the simple answer that these 2 are the only pathways in the decapod crustacean CNS that receive an ever-increasing sensory input during adult growth. To the contrary, input to all primary sensory neuropils of the decapod crustacean CNS appears to increase in much the same way during adult growth.
Sensory input to the CNS of decapod crustaceans, as in insects, is provided by compound eyes mediating vision (Bernhards 1921; Meinertzhagen 1991) and by small cuticular organs called sensilla mediating all other sensory modalities (Derby 1982; Schmidt and Gnatzy 1984; Hallberg and Hansson 1999). Compound eyes comprise numerous small units called ommatidia, each of which contains 8 photoreceptor neurons projecting their axons directly into the underlying lamina, the first neuropil of the optic lobe (Nässel 1976; Meinertzhagen 1991). Each sensillum houses from one to many primary sensory neurons projecting their axon directly into a target neuropil of the CNS (Derby 1982; Schmidt and Gnatzy 1984; Hallberg and Hansson 1999). Sensory neurons are unimodal and most of them are either mechano- or chemosensory (Derby 1982; Schmidt and Gnatzy 1989; Voigt and Atema 1992; Cate and Derby 2002), with only one reported exception (Hatt 1986). Sensilla are differentiated into many morphologically distinct types, each of which houses a specific complement of sensory neurons mediating one or several modalities. In decapod crustaceans, aesthetascs are the only sensillum type containing exclusively chemosensory neurons (Laverack and Ardill 1965, Spencer and Linberg 1986, Grünert and Ache 1988, Gleeson et al. 1996), few sensillum types exclusively contain mechanosensory neurons (Kouyama and Shimozawa 1982; Schmidt 1990), and most sensillum types are bimodal containing mechano- and chemosensory neurons (Altner et al. 1983; Schmidt and Gnatzy 1984; Cate and Derby 2001, 2002). Sensilla of various types occur in high numbers (in many cases thousands or tens of thousands) on almost all parts of the body and on all of its appendages, and their distribution is highly patterned. This is particularly obvious in the flagella (distal-most segments) of the 2 pairs of antennae of the decapod crustacean head, which consist of a series of pseudosegments called annuli each bearing a specific arrangement of various types of sensilla (Laverack 1964; Derby 1982; Sandeman 1989; Cate and Derby 2001).
From the first juvenile stage, in which a morphology closely resembling that of adults is obtained (Felder et al. 1985), decapod crustaceans grow in size by successive molts, and in most species this growth continues throughout the entire adult life (Hartnoll 1982). An enormous increase in body size can be obtained, often in the range of 1000-fold and in some species up to 10 000-fold (Helluy et al. 1995). The ever-increasing surface area accommodates more and more sensilla. Clearly, all types of sensilla increase in number with increasing body size (Thomas 1970; Letourneau 1976; Laverack 1987, 1988; Schmitz 1993), including the aesthetascs and other all sensilla on the lateral flagellum of the antennule (Tiews 1954; Sandeman et al. 1998; Steullet, Cate, and Derby 2000; Harrison, Cate, Steullet, et al. 2001). The compound eyes also increase in size with increasing body size due to both enlargement of the existing ommatidia and addition of new ommatidia (Bernhards 1921; Meyer-Rochow et al. 1990). Consequently, the number of sensory afferents projecting into the CNS increases substantially with body size, regardless of the sensory modality.
In light of this scenario, the answer to the initial question why adult neurogenesis is restricted to certain brain areas must lie in specific properties of these brain areas themselves which can only or at least better be achieved by adult neurogenesis and not by other forms of neuronal plasticity, such as synaptogenesis or sprouting of new arborizations. Thus, the initial question can be phrased more specifically as: Are there fundamental differences in information processing among the different sensory pathways of the decapod crustacean CNS that indicate a particular benefit of adult neurogenesis for the olfactory and the visual but not for the other sensory pathways? I believe that this is indeed the case and hypothesize that the fundamentally different "topographic logic" of information processing in the olfactory, visual, and other sensory pathways (which are primarily chemo- and mechanosensory pathways) is causal for the occurrence or the lack of adult neurogenesis. The topographic logic of information processing and its consequences for neurogenesis will be elaborated separately for 3 types of sensory pathways.
The visual pathway represents the most transparent case. The axons of the photoreceptor cells project in a topographically ordered way into vertical columns of the lamina constituting a correct 1:1 retinotopic map of the retinal ommatidia onto the lamina columns (Nässel 1976; Strausfeld and Nässel 1981; Meinertzhagen 1991). The neuropils of the optic lobes—the medulla externa and medulla interna—are also organized into vertical columns, and the retinotopic mapping seems to be preserved in their connections with each other and with the lamina. The columns in all 3 optic neuropils are mainly constituted by local columnar neurons, and these are horizontally connected by amacrine cells and centripetal large-field PNs (Strausfeld and Nässel 1981). When new ommatidia are added to the compound eyes during adult growth (Bernhards 1921; Meyer-Rochow et al. 1990), correct processing of their input requires the generation of new corresponding columns in at least the lamina and likely also in the medulla externa and medulla interna. Because these columns mainly consist of designated local neurons, these must be newly generated. The horizontally connecting neurons, on the other hand, could just grow new arborizations to adequately integrate novel columns into their information processing. Thus, this hypothesis gives rise to the testable prediction that the neurons formed by adult neurogenesis in the optic lobes of decapod crustaceans (Schmidt 1997; Sullivan and Beltz 2005b) likely are local columnar neurons and not amacrine cells and large-field PNs.
All primary sensory neuropils of the decapod crustacean CNS except the lamina of the optic lobe and the OL receive input from chemo- and mechanosensory sensilla on the body surface or the appendages. The tegumentary neuropils located in the tritocerebrum of the brain receive input from sensilla on the head (Tautz 1987a), the antenna II neuropils (AnN) receive input from sensilla on the second antennae (Tautz and Müller-Tautz 1983; Sandeman 1989), the LANs receive input from the nonaesthetasc sensilla on the first antennae (antennules) (Schmidt et al. 1992; Schmidt and Ache 1996a), the neuromeres of the subesophageal ganglion receive input from sensilla on the corresponding mouthparts, the thoracic ganglia receive input from sensilla on the corresponding pereiopods (chelae or walking legs), the abdominal ganglia receive input from sensilla on the corresponding pleopods, and the terminal ganglion receives input from the tailfan (telson and uropods) (Sandeman 1982; Antonsen and Edwards 2003). The unpaired median antennular neuropil located in the deutocerebrum of the brain represents a special case in that it receives mainly mechanosensory input from the statocysts, sense organs dedicated to gravity perception (Sandeman and Okajima 1973; Schmidt et al. 1992). Especially, the neuropils that receive input from the long annulated antennae (AnN and LAN) have an elongated shape and are obviously structured by a striation perpendicular to their long axis, generating the appearance of a stack of discs (Tautz and Müller-Tautz 1983; Schmidt and Ache 1996a). This structure suggests a somatotopic representation of the afferent sensory input in the corresponding neuropils (Figure 3A). This assumption, although not supported by direct evidence from sensilla backfills (which to date have not been possible in decapod crustaceans), is strengthened by the observation that the length of these neuropils corresponds to the length of the represented appendages (Helm 1928; Sandeman et al. 1993) and by the structure of the afferent terminals, which are either restricted to certain discs or are elongated with regularly spaced perpendicular side branches into several adjacent discs (Tautz and Müller-Tautz 1983; Schmidt et al. 1992; Schmidt and Ache 1996a). Information processing in these neuropils relies heavily on ascending or descending PNs and on motoneurons, whereas local interneurons seem to be scarce or absent (Tautz and Müller-Tautz 1983; Tautz 1987a; Schmidt and Ache 1993, 1996a). PNs and motoneurons show branching patterns that correspond to the striated structure of the neuropils in having repetitive perpendicular side branches interdigitating with the afferent terminals. Together, these structural features strongly suggest that the chemo- and mechanosensory input in these neuropils is processed somatotopically, which would allow identification of the position of a stimulus on the elongated flagella of the antennae. Behavioral data support the notion that decapod crustaceans are able to retrieve positional information upon chemo- and mechanosensory stimulation of the antennae (Maynard and Dingle 1963; Zeil et al. 1985; Tautz 1987b; Wilkens et al. 1996). How exactly chemosensory input is integrated in these neuropils is currently unknown, but the low number of putative chemoreceptor neurons (5–10) in the sensilla providing input to these neuropils (Cate and Derby 2001, 2002) together with the stereotyped, reflexive behaviors elicited by chemosensory stimulation (Schmidt and Derby 2005) suggests that these pathways are hard-wired and work according to the labeled-lines model of chemosensory information processing (Erickson 2000). Further support for the somatotopic mode of information processing in primary chemo- and mechanosensory neuropils is provided by backfills of sensilla on the legs of insects, by which it was shown directly that chemo- and mechanosensory neurons form parallel and overlapping somatotopic maps in the corresponding leg ganglia (Newland et al. 2000). In addition, behavioral experiments show that insects retrieve positional information from chemo- and mechanosensory stimulation of diverse body parts (Newland and Burrows 1997; Rogers and Newland 2000; Gaaboub et al. 2005). In neuropils organized for this somatotopic mode of information processing, additional sensory input arising during adult (or juvenile) growth can correctly be integrated into the preexisting circuitry by extending new side branches from PNs and motoneurons at the appropriate locations (Figure 3B). The generation of new neurons of these types would not add novel capacities for extracting positional information, and I propose that this is the underlying reason for the lack of adult neurogenesis among them. Indeed, the central and peripheral arbors of motoneurons innervating leg muscles of H. americanus increase enormously in size and density during juvenile and adult growth, but their number remains constant (Govind 1984; Laverack 1987, 1988; Purves 1988; Govind and Pearce 1989).
How is the topographic logic of information processing different in the OL? The OL of decapod crustaceans is organized into glomeruli receiving the afferent axons of the ORNs (Sandeman and Luff 1973; Sandeman and Denburg 1976; Blaustein et al. 1988; Mellon and Munger 1990; Schmidt and Ache 1992; Sandeman DC and Sandeman RE 1994), as is the case for primary olfactory neuropils in other taxa, especially the antennal lobe of insects and the olfactory bulb of vertebrates (Ache and Young 2005). Further parallels are the prevalent uniglomerular arborizations of the afferents (Schmidt and Ache 1992; Mellon and Alones 1993), their nontopographical projections to the OL (Sandeman and Denburg 1976; Mellon and Munger 1990), the participation of large numbers of local interneurons in information processing (Schmidt and Ache 1996b; Sandeman et al. 1998), and the multi- to totiglomerular arborization patterns of the local interneurons (Mellon and Alones 1995; Schmidt and Ache 1996b; Wachowiak et al. 1997). A stark contrast between decapod crustaceans on the one hand and insects and mammals on the other is the different arborization patterns of the PNs. In decapod crustaceans, PNs are multiglomerular with dense arbors in 3–10 glomeruli in different parts of the OL and sparse branching in many other glomeruli (Wachowiak and Ache 1994; Schmidt and Ache 1996b). On the other hand, PNs of insects and mammals usually have uniglomerular arborizations (Dryer and Graziadei 1994; Schachtner et al. 2005). Generally, each ORN of mammals and insects expresses one odorant receptor type out of a much larger repertoire (ca. 100 in insects and up to 1000 in mammals), and the axons of ORNs expressing the same odorant receptor type converge in one or a pair of glomeruli with stereotypic positions (Mombaerts et al. 1996; Couto et al. 2005). Thus, the projections of the ORNs onto the glomeruli of the primary olfactory neuropil constitute an "odotopic" map in which neither the position of the ORNs in the periphery nor their physical correlation to each other (by being packaged in the same sensilla in insects) is preserved (Couto et al. 2005). Stimulation with different odorants causes distinct spatial and temporal patterns of glomerular activation (Wang et al. 2003; Wachowiak et al. 2004), and the activity of local interneurons mediating lateral interactions between glomeruli seems to be critical for encoding these patterns and thus odor quality (Stopfer et al. 1997). Although odorant receptor genes have not yet been identified in decapod crustaceans and the projections of afferents of different classes of ORNs are currently unknown, the high structural similarity of their ORNs and primary olfactory neuropils with those of insects and mammals strongly suggests that also in the OL of decapod crustaceans the topographical logic of information processing is based on an odotopic map (Figure 3A). Consequently, odorant quality most likely is encoded in glomerular activation patterns. In contrast to the situation in the antennal lobe of insects and the olfactory bulb of mammals, the PNs of the OL of decapod crustaceans are multiglomerular and thus could themselves be able to integrate particular patterns of glomerular activation and hence encode odor quality. Because exposure to novel olfactory stimuli will generate novel glomerular activation patterns, new PNs with dense arborizations in novel combinations of spatially unrelated glomeruli would be uniquely suitable to encode such novel olfactory stimuli (Figure 3B). In contrast to the situation in the somatotopic mode of processing mechano- and chemosensory information, the sprouting of new branches to other glomeruli by preexisting PNs would severely alter the logic of information coding in the odotopic mode because different glomerular activation patterns code for distinctly different odor qualities (Wang et al. 2003; Wachowiak et al. 2004). Thus, it seems that adult decapod crustaceans generate new PNs as a means to continuously adapt to changing and novel odorants. The very long life expectancy of many adult decapod crustaceans in the range of years or even decades (Farmer 1973; Belchier et al. 1998; Sheehy et al. 1999; Bluhm and Brey 2001), and a lifestyle that often includes extended migrations and change of habitats (Herrnkind and McLean 1971; Boles and Lohmann 2003), would make such adaptability to changing odorant environments particularly advantageous. The very long life expectancy is also prerequisite for the newly generated neurons to become physiologically relevant because their maturation lasts several weeks to months (Schmidt 2001; Sullivan and Beltz 2005b).
The hypothesis that new PNs of adult decapod crustaceans are generated to allow adaptation to novel odor stimuli has some interesting collaterals. 1) Most importantly, it implies that the increase in the number of ORN afferents during adult growth is not the root cause for the generation of new PNs. This notion is strongly supported by several observations. Firstly, the generation of new ORNs is discontinuous because it is coupled to molting (Sandeman et al. 1998; Steullet, Cate, and Derby 2000; Harrison, Cate, and Swanson, et al. 2001), whereas the generation of new PNs is a continuous process and therefore mainly occurring during the long intermolt phase (Schmidt 1997, 2001). Secondly, in L. emarginata, a decapod crustacean species that stops molting and growing as an adult after which it does not produce any new ORNs, the generation of new PNs continues in the remaining adult life (Sullivan and Beltz 2005a). Thirdly, the number of OL glomeruli does not change during adult life (Helluy et al. 1996), indicating that all newly generated ORN afferents project into these preexisting glomeruli all which are already innervated by numerous PNs. The increase in the number of afferents could adequately be accommodated simply by enlarging the glomeruli and the arbors of the preexisting PNs that they contain. Glomerular growth has indeed been reported for the OL of adult decapod crustaceans (Helluy et al. 1996). Very likely it provides a mechanism to increase odor sensitivity; however, a more differentiated coding of odor quality cannot be achieved in this way. 2) In the OL, not only PNs but also small LNs have multiglomerular arborizations, whereas large LNs have totiglomerular arborizations (Schachtner et al. 2005). Therefore, according to the scheme developed above, also new small LNs could provide novel connectivity between glomeruli and thus improve odor quality coding. This might be the reason that in some species of decapod crustaceans also new LNs are continuously generated during adult life albeit in much lower numbers than PNs (Sandeman et al. 1998; Schmidt and Harzsch 1999; Schmidt 2001; Sullivan and Beltz 2005a, Sullivan et al. 2007). Why neurogenesis of LNs, if it is beneficial for odor quality coding, occurs only in some but not in all species is currently unclear. An answer possibly lies in the multitude of morphologically and immunocytochemically distinct types of small LNs (Schachtner et al. 2005), as it is currently unknown which of these types occur in different species of decapod crustaceans and more importantly which types are newly generated by adult neurogenesis, if it occurs. 3) Why does adult neurogenesis not also occur in the antennal lobe of insects—especially because it implements odotopic information processing? The answer may lie in the comparatively short life expectancy of adult insects, which is in the range of weeks to some months, and in their generally specialized lifestyle which is associated with a more constant odor environment. The short life expectancy makes it unlikely that new neurons generated during adulthood could actually take effect, given that in decapod crustaceans and mammals neurons generated by adult neurogenesis need several weeks to months to mature (Schmidt 2001; Ming and Song 2005; Sullivan and Beltz 2005b). The more constant odor environment would mean that changes in odor coding achieved by adult neurogenesis during the adult phase would have little or no adaptive advantage. In this context, it would be of great interest to study adult neurogenesis in the brain of the queens of social insects (e.g., honey bees), as individuals of this cast live much longer than their worker siblings but spend most of their adult life in the extremely constant odor environment of the hive or nest. 4) A striking difference between adult neurogenesis in the OL of decapod crustaceans and the olfactory bulb of mammals is the types of neurons generated. In decapod crustaceans, primarily PNs are generated; LNs are generated only in some of the tested species, and in all these species they are always generated in much lower number than PNs (see above). In contrast, in mammals, exclusively LNs (mostly periglomerular neurons, but also some granule cells) are generated (Luskin 1993; Hack et al. 2005; Kohwi et al. 2005). This difference may be due to the fundamentally different dendritic branching pattern of the PNs of both taxa. While the dendritic arbors of PNs are multiglomerular in decapod crustaceans (see above), they are uniglomerular in PNs of mammals (mitral cells and tufted cells) (Dryer and Graziadei 1994). Thus, according to the arguments developed above, generation of new PNs in the olfactory bulb of mammals would not generate novel connectivity between olfactory glomeruli, whereas generation of new LNs, which form lateral connections between glomeruli (Aungst et al. 2003), would. An interesting group of vertebrates to test the validity of this conclusion are teleost fish because most or at least some of their PNs (mitral and tufted cells) have multiglomerular dendritic arbors (Kosaka and Hama 1982; Oka 1983; Fuller et al. 2006). Occurrence of adult neurogenesis in the olfactory bulb of teleost fish has been documented repeatedly (Byrd and Brunjes 2002; Zupanc et al. 2005; Adolf et al. 2006; Grandel et al. 2006), but the types of neurons that are generated have not been identified conclusively. Recent immunocytochemical evidence indicates that mainly GABAergic and dopaminergic local interneurons are generated but the production of new PNs has not been excluded (Adolf et al. 2006).
|
Concluding remarks |
|---|
Neurogenesis persists in the adult brains of diverse animals, making it a common phenomenon that is not correlated with phylogeny or overall complexity of their brains. However, adult neurogenesis is restricted to only one or very few brain regions, making it a rare event with respect to the numerous neuronal populations comprising the brain. Decapod crustaceans, which show adult neurogenesis in 2 brain areas—the optic lobes and the central olfactory pathway—are useful animal models because they provide insight into why adult neurogenesis is restricted to certain brain regions. Their usefulness arises from the fact that most of them show indeterminate growth as adults, which results in a continuous increase in the number of sensory afferents of all modalities providing input to numerous primary sensory neuropils of the brain and other parts of the CNS. Obviously, the increase in the number of sensory afferents per se cannot be the root cause for adult neurogenesis, as this is lacking in most of the primary sensory neuropils, the ones that process mechano- and chemosensory information from all parts of the body and its appendages. I hypothesize that instead fundamental differences in the topographic logic of information processing in the 3 types of primary sensory neuropils of decapod crustaceans (visual, olfactory, and mechano- and chemosensory) account for the occurrence or the lack of adult neurogenesis in them. In the primary visual neuropil, which has a retinotopic representation of the periphery, adult neurogenesis is required to produce more local interneurons forming new cartridges accommodating an ever-increasing number of ommatidia (=pixels). Thus, it is essential for an increase in light sensitivity and, more importantly, for an increase in the spatial resolution of vision. The numerous primary mechano- and chemosensory neuropils, which have a somatotopic representation of the periphery, can have their ever-increasing sensory input adequately integrated by simply increasing the size and density of the dendritic arbors of preexisting PNs and motoneurons, which seem to carry out most of the information processing. Thus, an increase in sensitivity and spatial resolution can be achieved without the generation of new neurons. In the primary olfactory neuropil, which very likely has an odotopic representation of the periphery, new neurons provide a means to interconnect novel combinations of spatially unrelated input channels (glomeruli), whose simultaneous activation by specific odorants is at the root of odor coding. Thus, adult neurogenesis would allow encoding of the quality of novel odor stimuli without losing the resolution for other odor qualities, whereas an increase in the arborization of preexisting neurons would be sufficient to increase sensitivity. Animals with a long life expectancy and an active lifestyle are likely to encounter novel odor stimuli throughout their life, and this could explain why adult neurogenesis of olfactory interneurons is widespread among vertebrates and decapod crustaceans but not insects.
|
Acknowledgements |
|---|
I want to thank Charles Derby (Georgia State University) for the invitation to participate in the Presidential Symposium at the 2006 AChemS meeting on "Why have neurogenesis in adult olfactory systems?" and for critically reading the manuscript. I also want to thank Vivian Ngo (Georgia State University) for her excellent technical support and Akikazu Yasuda (Suntory Institute for Bioorganic Research, Osaka, Japan) for generously providing SIFamide antiserum. Parts of the studies presented here were supported by grants from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Schm 738/8-1, 8-2). This paper is based on a contribution at The Presidential Symposium at the 2006 Annual Meeting of the Association for Chemoreception Sciences, "Why Have Neurogenesis in Adult Olfactory Systems?" (Derby 2007
). The symposium was supported by the National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (grant DC02038). |
References |
|---|
Ache BW and Young JM. (2005) Olfaction: Diverse species, conserved principles. Neuron 48:417–430.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Adolf B, Chapouton P, Lam CS, Topp S, Tannhauser B, Strahle U, Götz M, Bally-Cuif L. (2006) Conserved and acquired features of adult neurogenesis in the zebrafish telencephalon. Dev Biol 295:278–293.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Altner I, Hatt H, Altner H. (1983) Structural properties of bimodal chemo- and mechanosensitive setae on the pereiopod chelae of the crayfish, Austropotamobius torrentium. Cell Tissue Res 228:357–374.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Alvarez-Buylla A and Lim DA. (2004) For the long run: maintaining germinal niches in the adult brain. Neuron 41:683–686.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Antonsen BL and Edwards D. (2003) Differential dye coupling reveals lateral giant escape circuit in crayfish. J Comp Neurol 466:1–13.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Aungst JL, Heyward PM, Puche AC, Karnup SV, Hayar A, Szabo G, Shipley MT. (2003) Center-surround inhibition among olfactory bulb glomeruli. Nature 426:623–629.[CrossRef][Medline]
Bate CM. (1976) Embryogenesis in an insect nervous system. I. A map of the thoracic and abdominal neuroblasts in Locusta migratoria. J Embryol Exp Morph 35:107–123.[Web of Science][Medline]
Belchier M, Edsman L, Sheehy MRJ, Shelton PMJ. (1998) Estimating age and growth in long-lived temperate frehwater crayfish using lipofuscin. Freshwater Biology 39:439–446.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
Bello BC, Hirth F, Gould AP. (2003) A pulse of the Drosophila hox protein abdominal-A schedules the end of neural proliferation via neuroblast apoptosis. Neuron 37:209–219.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Beltz BS, Benton JL, Sullivan JM. (2001) Transient uptake of serotonin by newborn olfactory projection neurons. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:12730–12735.
Beltz BS, Kordas K, Lee MM, Long JB, Benton JL, Sandeman D. (2003) Ecological, evolutionary, and functional correlates of sensilla number and glomerular density in the olfactory system of decapod crustaceans. J Comp Neurol 455:260–269.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Beltz BS and Sandeman DC. (2003) Regulation of life-long neurogenesis in the decapod crustacean brain. Arthropod Struct Dev 32:39–60.[CrossRef][Medline]
Benton JL and Beltz BS. (2002) Patterns of neurogenesis in the midbrain of embryonic lobsters differ from proliferation in the insect and the crustacean ventral nerve cord. J Neurobiol 53:57–67.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Bernhards H. (1921) Der Bau des Komplexauges von Astacus fluviatilis (Potamobius astacus L.). Z wiss Zool 116:649–707.
Blaustein DN, Derby CD, Simmons RB, Beall AC. (1988) Structure of the brain and medulla terminalis of the spiny lobster Panulirus argus and the crayfish Procambarus clarkii, with an emphasis on olfactory centers. J Crust Biol 8:493–519.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
Bluhm BA and Brey T. (2001) Age determination in the Antarctic shrimp Notocrangon antarcticus (Crustacea: Decapoda), using the autofluorescent pigment lipofuscin. Mar Biol 138:247–257.[CrossRef]
Boles LC and Lohmann KJ. (2003) True navigation and magnetic maps in spiny lobsters. Nature 421:60–63.[CrossRef][Medline]
Byrd CA and Brunjes PC. (2002) Neurogenesis in the olfactory bulb of adult zebrafish. Neuroscience 105:793–801.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
Cate HS and Derby CD. (2001) Morphology and distribution of setae on the antennules of the Caribbean spiny lobster Panulirus argus reveal new types of bimodal chemo-mechanosensilla. Cell Tissue Res 304:439–454.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Cate HS and Derby CD. (2002) Ultrastructure and physiology of the hooded sensillum, a bimodal chemo-mechanosensillum of lobsters. J Comp Neurol 442:293–307.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Cayre M, Scotto-Lomassese S, Malaterre J, Strambi C, Strambi A. (2007) Understanding the regulation and function of adult neurogenesis: contributions from an insect model, the house cricket. Chem Senses 10.1093/chemse/bjm010 Forthcoming.
Cayre M, Strambi C, Charpin P, Augier R, Meyer MR, Edwards JS, Strambi A. (1996) Neurogenesis in adult insect mushroom bodies. J Comp Neurol 371:300–310.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Cayre M, Strambi C, Charpin P, Augier R, Strambi A. (1997) Specific requirement of putrescine for the mitogenic action of juvenile hormone on adult insect neuroblasts. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94:8238–8242.
Cayre M, Strambi C, Strambi A. (1994) Neurogenesis in an adult insect brain and its hormonal control. Nature 368:57–59.[CrossRef]
Charriaut-Marlangue C and Ben-Ari Y. (1995) A cautionary note on the use of the TUNEL stain to determine apoptosis. Neuroreport 7:61–64.[Web of Science][Medline]
Christie BR and Cameron HA. (2006) Neurogenesis in the adult hippocampus. Hippocampus 16:199–207.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Conan GY, Comeau M, Moriyasu M. (2001) Are morphological approaches appropriate to establish size at maturity for male American lobster, Homarus americanus? J Crust Biol 21:937–947.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
Couto A, Alenius M, Dickson BJ. (2005) Molecular, anatomical, and functional organization of the Drosophila olfactory system. Curr Biol 15:1535–1547.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Derby CD. (1982) Structure and function of cuticular sensilla of the lobster Homarus americanus. J Crust Biol 2:1–21.[Medline]
Derby CD. (2007) Why have neurogenesis in adult olfactory systems? The Presidential Symposium at the 2006 AChemS Conference. Chem Senses Forthcoming 10.1093/chemse/bjm011.
Derby CD, Cate HS, Steullet P, Harrison PJH. (2003) Comparison of turnover in the olfactory organ of early juvenile stage and adult Caribbean spiny lobsters. Arthropod Struct Dev 31:297–311.[CrossRef][Medline]
Doe CQ and Skeath JB. (1996) Neurogenesis in the insect central nervous system. Curr Opin Neurobiol 6:18–24.[Medline]
Doetsch F. (2003) The glial identity of neural stem cells. Nat Neurosci 6:1127–1134.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Doetsch F, Caille I, Lim DA, Garcia-Verdugo JM, Alvarez-Buylla A. (1999) Subventricular zone astrocytes are neural stem cells in the adult mammalian brain. Cell 97:703–716.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Dryer L and Graziadei PPC. (1994) Mitral cell dendrites: a comparative approach. Anat Embryol (Berl) 189:91–106.[Medline]
Dufour M-C and Gadenne C. (2006) Adult neurogenesis in a moth brain. J Comp Neurol 495:635–643.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Erickson RP. (2000) The evolution of neural coding ideas in the chemical senses. Physiol Behav 69:3–13.[CrossRef][Medline]
Eriksson PS, Perfilieva E, Björk-Eriksson T, Alborn AM, Nordborg C, Peterson DA, Gage FH. (1998) Neurogenesis in the adult human hippocampus. Nat Med 4:1313–1317.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Fahrbach SE, Strande JL, Robinson GE. (1995) Neurogenesis is absent in the brains of adult honey bees and does not explain behavioral neuroplasticity. Neurosci Lett 197:145–148.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Farmer AS. (1973) Age and growth in Nephrops norvegicus (Decapoda: Nephropidae). Mar Biol 23:315–325.[CrossRef]
Felder DL, Martin JW, Goy JW. (1985) Patterns on the early postlarval development of decapods. In Wenner AM (Ed.). Crustacean issues 2, larval growth(A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam (Netherlands)) pp. 163–225.
Font E, Desfilis E, Pérez-Cañellas MM, García-Verdugo JM. (2002) Neurogenesis and neuronal regeneration in the adult reptilian brain. Brain Behav Evol 58:276–295.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
Fuller CL, Yettaw HK, Byrd CA. (2006) Mitral cells in the olfactory bulb of adult zebrafish (Danio rerio): morphology and distribution. J Comp Neurol 499:218–230.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Gaaboub I, Schuppe H, Newland PL. (2005) Position-dependent sensitivity and density of taste receptors on the locust leg underlies behavioural effectiveness of chemosensory stimulation. J Comp Physiol 191:281–289.[CrossRef]
Gage FH, Kempermann G, Palmer TD, Peterson DA, Ray J. (1998) Multipotent progenitor cells in the adult dentate gyrus. J Neurobiol 36:249–266.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Garcia ADR, Doan NB, Imura T, Bush TG, Sofroniew MV. (2004) GFAP-expressing progenitors are the principal source of constitutive neurogenesis in adult mouse forebrain. Nat Neurosci 7:1233–1241.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Gheusi G and Lledo P-M. (2007) Control of early events in olfactory processing by adult neurogenesis. Chem Senses Forthcoming 10.1093/chemse/bjm012.
Ghiradella H, Case J, Cronshaw J. (1968) Structure of aesthetascs in selected marine and terrestrial decapods: chemoreceptor morphology and environment. Am Zool 8:603–621.[Web of Science][Medline]
Gleeson RA. (1982) Morphological and behavioral identification of the sensory structures mediating pheromone reception in the blue crab, Callinectes sapidus. Biol Bull 163:162–171.
Gleeson RA, McDowell LM, Aldrich HC. (1996) Structure of the aesthetasc (olfactory) sensilla of the blue crab, Callinectes sapidus: transformations as a function of salinity. Cell Tissue Res 284:279–288.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
Goergen EM, Bagay LA, Rehm K, Benton JL, Beltz BS. (2002) Circadian control of neurogenesis. J Neurobiol 53:90–95.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Goldman SA. (1998) Adult neurogenesis: from canaries to the clinic. J Neurobiol 36:267–286.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Govind CK. (1984) Development of asymmetry in the neuromuscular system of lobster claws. Biol Bull 167:94–119.
Govind CK and Pearce J. (1989) Growth of inhibitory innervation in a lobster muscle. J Morphol 199:197–205.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Grandel H, Kaslin J, Ganz J, Wenzel I, Brand M. (2006) Neural stem cells and neurogenesis in the adult zebrafish brain: origin, proliferation dynamics, migration and cell fate. Dev Biol 295:263–277.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Gross CG. (2000) Neurogenesis in the adult brain: death of a dogma. Nat Rev Neurosci 1:67–73.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Grünert U and Ache BW. (1988) Ultrastructure of the aesthetasc (olfactory) sensilla of the spiny lobster, Panulirus argus. Cell Tissue Res 251:95–103.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
Gu SH, Tsia WH, Chiang AS, Chow YS. (1999) Mitogenic effects of 20-hydroxyecdysone on neurogenesis in adult mushroom bodies of the cockroach, Diploptera punctata. J Neurobiol 39:264–274.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Hack MA, Saghatelyan A, de Chevigny A, Pfeifer A, Ashery-Padan R, Lledo P-M, Götz M. (2005) Neuronal fate determinants of adults olfactory bulb neurogenesis. Nat Neurosci 8:865–872.[Web of Science][Medline]
Hallberg E and Hansson BS. (1999) Arthropod sensilla: morphology and phylogenetic considerations. Microsc Res Tech 47:428–439.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Hansen A and Schmidt M. (2001) Neurogenesis in the central olfactory pathway of the adult shore crab Carcinus maenas is controlled by sensory afferents. J Comp Neurol 441:223–233.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Hansen A and Schmidt M. (2004) Influence of season and environment on adult neurogenesis in the central olfactory pathway of the shore crab, Carcinus maenas. Brain Res 1025:85–97.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Harrison PJH, Cate HS, Steullet P, Derby CD. (2001) Structural plasticity in the olfactory system of adult spiny lobsters: postembryonic development permits life-long growth, turnover and regeneration. Mar Freshw Res 52:1357–1365.[CrossRef]
Harrison PJH, Cate HS, Swanson ES, Derby CD. (2001) Postembryonic proliferation in the spiny lobster antennular epithelium: rate of genesis of olfactory receptor neurons is dependent on molt stage. J Neurobiol 47:51–66.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Hartenstein V, Rudloff E, Campos-Ortega JA. (1987) The pattern of proliferation of the neuroblasts in the wild-type embryo of Drosophila melanogaster. Roux's Arch Dev Biol 196:473–485.[CrossRef]
Hartnoll RG. (1982) Growth. In Abele LG (Ed.). The biology of Crustacea. Volume 2. Embryology, morphology, and genetics(Academic Press, New York) pp. 111–196.
Harzsch S. (2001) Neurogenesis in the crustacean ventral nerve cord: homology of neuronal stem cells in Malacostraca and Branchiopoda? . Evol Dev 3:154–169.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Harzsch S. (2003) Ontogeny of the ventral nerve cord in malacostracan crustaceans: a common plan for neuronal development in Crustacea, Hexapoda and other Arthropoda? Arthropod Struct Dev 32:17–37.[CrossRef][Medline]
Harzsch S, Benton J, Dawirs RR, Beltz B. (1999) A new look at embryonic development of the visual system in decapod crustaceans: neuropil formation, neurogenesis, and apoptotic cell death. J Neurobiol 39:294–306.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Harzsch S and Dawirs RR. (1994) Neurogenesis in larval stages of the spider crab Hyas araneus (Decapoda, Brachyura): proliferation of neuroblasts in the ventral nerve cord. Roux's Arch Dev Biol 204:93–100.[CrossRef]
Harzsch S and Dawirs RR. (1996a) Maturation of the compound eyes and eyestalk ganglia during larval development of the brachyuran crustaceans Hyas araneus L. (Decapoda, Majidae) and Carcinus maenas L. (Decapoda, Portunidae). Zoology 99:189–204.
Harzsch S and Dawirs RR. (1996b) Neurogenesis in the developing crab brain: postembryonic generation of neurons persists beyond metamorphosis. J Neurobiol 29:384–398.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Harzsch S, Miller J, Benton J, Beltz B. (1999) From embryo to adult: persistent neurogenesis and apoptotic cell death shape the lobster deutocerebrum. J Neurosci 19:3472–3485.
Harzsch S, Miller J, Benton J, Dawirs RR, Beltz B. (1998) Neurogenesis in the thoracic neuromeres of two crustaceans with different types of metamorphic development. J Exp Biol 201:2465–2479.[Abstract]
Hatt H. (1986) Responses of a bimodal neuron (chemo- and vibration-sensitive) on the walking legs of the crayfish. J Comp Physiol 159:611–617.[CrossRef]
Helluy S, Sandeman R, Beltz B, Sandeman D. (1993) Comparative brain ontogeny of the crayfish and clawed lobster: implications of direct and larval development. J Comp Neurol 335:343–354.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Helluy SM, Benton JL, Langworthy KA, Ruchhoeft ML, Beltz BS. (1996) Glomerular organization in developing olfactory and accessory lobes of American lobsters: stabilization of numbers and increase in size after metamorphosis. J Neurobiol 29:459–472.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Helluy SM, Ruchhoeft ML, Beltz BS. (1995) Development of the olfactory and accessory lobes in the American lobster: an allometric analysis and its implications for the deutocerebral structure of decapods. J Comp Neurol 357:433–445.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Helm F. (1928) Vergleichend-anatomische Untersuchungen über das Gehirn, insbesondere das "Antennalganglion" der Dekapoden. Z Morph Ökol Tiere 12:70–134.[CrossRef]
Herrnkind WF and McLean R. (1971) Field studies of homing, mass emigration, and orientation in the spiny lobster, Panulirus argus. Ann NY Acad Sci 188:359–377.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Horner AJ and Derby CD. (2005) Chemical signals and chemosensory pathways involved in spiny lobster sheltering behavior. Chem Senses 30:A97.[CrossRef]
Johnson ME and Atema J. (2005) The olfactory pathway for individual recognition in the American lobster Homarus americanus. J Exp Biol 208:2865–2872.
Kittaka J, Ono K, Booth JD, Webber WR. (2005) Development of the red rock lobster, Jasus edwardsii, from egg to juvenile. N Z J Mar Freshw Res 39:263–277.
Kohwi M, Osumi N, Rubenstein JLR, Alvarez-Buylla A. (2005) Pax6 is required for making specific subpopulations of granule and periglomerular neurons in the olfactory bulb. J Neurosci 25:6997–7003.
Kornack DR and Rakic P. (2001) The generation, migration, and differentiation of olfactory neurons in the adult primate brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:4752–4757.
Kosaka T and Hama K. (1982) Structure of the mitral cell in the olfactory bulb of the goldfish (Carassius auratus). J Comp Neurol 212:365–384.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Kouyama N and Shimozawa T. (1982) The structure of a hair mechanoreceptor in the antennule of crayfish (Crustacea). Cell Tissue Res 226:565–578.[Web of Science][Medline]
Laurent G. (2002) Olfactory network dynamics and the coding of multidimensional signals. Nat Rev Neurosci 3:884–895.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Laverack MS. (1964) The antennular sense organs of Panulirus argus. Comp Biochem Physiol 13:301–321.[Medline]
Laverack MS. (1987) The nervous system of Crustacea, with special reference to the organization of the sensory system. In Ali MA (Ed.). Nervous systems in invertebrates(Plenum Publishing Corporation, New York) pp. 323–352.
Laverack MS. (1988) The numbers of neurones in decapod crustacea. J Crust Biol 8:1–11.[Medline]
Laverack MS and Ardill DJ. (1965) The innervation of the aesthetasc hairs of Panulirus argus. Quart J Microsc Sci 106:45–60.
Leonard RB, Coggeshall RE, Willis WD. (1978) A documentation of an age related increase in neuronal and axonal numbers in the stingray, Dasyatis sabina, Leseuer. J Comp Neurol 179:13–22.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Letourneau JG. (1976) Addition of sensory structures and associated neurons to the crayfish telson during development. J Comp Physiol 110:13–23.
Linser PJ, Trapido-Rosenthal HG, Orona E. (1997) Glutamine synthetase is a glial-specific marker in the olfactory regions of the lobster (Panulirus argus) nervous system. Glia 20:275–283.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Lomassese SS, Strambi C, Strambi A, Charpin P, Augier R, Aouane A, Cayre M. (2000) Influence of environmental stimulation on neurogenesis in the adult insect brain. J Neurobiol 45:162–171.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Luskin MB. (1993) Restricted proliferation and migration of postnatally generated neurons derived from the subventricular zone. Neuron 11:173–189.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Ma DK, Ming G, Song H. (2005) Glial influences on neural stem cell development: cellular niches for adult neurogenesis. Curr Opin Neurobiol 15:514–520.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Marcus K. (1911) Über Geruchsorgane bei decapoden Krebsen aus der Gruppe der Galatheiden. Z Wiss Zool 97:511–545.
Maynard DM and Dingle H. (1963) An effect of eyestalk ablation on the antennular function in the spiny lobster, Panulirus argus. Z Vergl Physiol 46:515–540.[CrossRef]
McKinzie ME, Benton JL, Beltz BS, Mellon D. (2003) Parasol cells in the hemiellipsoid body of the crayfish Procambarus clarkii: dendritic branching patterns and functional implications. J Comp Neurol 462:168–179.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Meinertzhagen IA. (1991) Evolution of the cellular organization of the arthropod compound eye and optic lobe. In Cronly-Dillon JR and Gregory RL (Eds.). Vision and visual dysfunction, Vol. 2. Evolution of the eye and visual systems(Macmillan Press, London) pp. 341–363.
Mellon D Jr and Alones V. (1993) Cellular organization and growth-related plasticity of the crayfish olfactory midbrain. Microsc Res Tech 24:231–259.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Mellon D Jr and Alones V. (1995) Identification of three classes of multiglomerular, broad-spectrum neurons in the crayfish olfactory midbrain by correlated patterns of electrical activity and dendritic arborization. J Comp Physiol 177:55–71.
Mellon D Jr, Alones V, Lawrence MD. (1992) Anatomy and fine structure of neurons in the deutocerebral projection pathway of the crayfish olfactory system. J Comp Neurol 321:93–111.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Mellon D Jr and Munger SD. (1990) Nontopographic projection of olfactory sensory neurons in the crayfish brain. J Comp Neurol 296:253–262.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Mellon D Jr, Tuten HR, Redick J. (1989) Distribution of radioactive leucine following uptake by olfactory sensory neurons in normal and heteromorphic crayfish antennules. J Comp Neurol 280:645–662.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Meyer-Rochow VB, Towers D, Ziedins I. (1990) Growth patterns in the eye of Petrolisthes elongatus (Crustacea; Decapoda; Anomura). Exp Biol 48:329–340.[Web of Science][Medline]
Michel WC, Trapido-Rosenthal HG, Chao ET, Wachowiak M. (1993) Stereoselective detection of amino acids by lobster olfactory receptor neurons. J Comp Physiol 171:705–712.[CrossRef]
Ming G and Song H. (2005) Adult neurogenesis in the mammalian central nervous system. Annu Rev Neurosci 28:223–250.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Mombaerts P, Wang F, Dulac C, Chao SK, Nemes A, Mendelsohn M, Edmondson J, Axel R. (1996) Visualizing an olfactory sensory map. Cell 87:675–686.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Morshead CM and Van der Kooy D. (1992) Postmitotic death is the fate of constitutively proliferating cells in the subependymal layer of the adult mouse brain. J Neurosci 12:249–256.[Abstract]
Nässel DR. (1976) The retina and retinal projection on the lamina ganglionaris of the crayfish Pacifastacus leniusculus (Dana). J Comp Neurol 167:341–360.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Newland PL and Burrows M. (1997) Processing of tactile information in neuronal networks controlling leg movements of the locust. J Insect Physiol 43:107–123.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Newland PL, Rogers SM, Gaaboub I, Matheson T. (2000) Parallel somatotopic maps of gustatory and mechanosensory neurons in the central nervous system of an insect. J Comp Neurol 425:82–96.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Oka Y. (1983) Golgi, electron-microscopic and combined Golgi-electron-microscopic studies of the mitral cells in the goldfish olfactory bulb. Neuroscience 8:723–742.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Orona E, Battelle B-A, Ache BW. (1990) Immunohistochemical and biochemical evidence for the putative inhibitory neurotransmitters histamine and GABA in lobster olfactory lobes. J Comp Neurol 294:633–646.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Palmer TD, Willhoite AR, Gage FH. (2000) Vascular niche for adult hippocampal neurogenesis. J Comp Neurol 425:479–494.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Pérez-Cañellas MR and García-Verdugo JM. (1996) Adult neurogenesis in the telencephalon of a lizard: a [3H] thymidine autoradiographic and bromodeoxyuridine immunocytochemical study. Dev Brain Res 93:49–61.[CrossRef][Medline]
Polenov AL and Chetverukhin VK. (1993) Ultrastructural radioautographic analysis of neurogenesis in the hypothalamus of the adult frog, Rana temporaria, with special reference to physiological regeneration of the preoptic nucleus. II. Types of neuronal cells produced. Cell Tissue Res 271:351–362.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Purves D. (1988) Implications of the trophic theory of neural connections. Body and brain. A trophic theory of neuronal connections(Harvard University Press, Cambridge).
Raymond PA and Easter SS Jr. (1983) Postembryonic growth of the optic tectum in goldfish. I. Location of germinal cells and numbers of neurons produced. J Neurosci 3:1077–1091.[Abstract]
Rogers SM and Newland PL. (2000) Local movements evoked by chemical stimulation of the hind leg in the locust Schistocerca gregaria. J Exp Biol 203:423–433.[Abstract]
Roye DB. (1994) Antennular withdrawal motoneurons in the lateral antennular neuropil of Callinectes sapidus. J Crust Biol 14:484–496.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
Sandeman D, Sandeman R, Derby C, Schmidt M. (1992) Morphology of the brain of crayfish, crabs, and spiny lobsters: a common nomenclature for homologous structures. Biol Bull 183:304–326.[Abstract]
Sandeman DC. (1982) Organization of the central nervous system. In Atwood HL and Sandeman DC (Eds.). The biology of Crustacea, Vol. 3. Neurobiology: structure and function(Academic Press, New York) pp. 1–61.
Sandeman DC. (1989) Physical properties, sensory receptors and tactile reflexes of the antenna of the Australian freshwater crayfish Cherax destructor. J Exp Biol 141:197–217.
Sandeman DC and Denburg JL. (1976) The central projections of chemoreceptor axons in the crayfish revealed by axoplasmic transport. Brain Res 115:492–496.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Sandeman DC and Luff SE. (1973) The structural organization of glomerular neuropile in the olfactory and accessory lobes of an Australian freshwater crayfish, Cherax destructor. Z Zellforsch 142:37–61.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Sandeman DC and Okajima A. (1973) Statocyst-induced eye movements in the crab Scylla serrata. III. The anatomical projections of sensory and motor neurones and the responses of the motor neurones. J Exp Biol 59:17–38.
Sandeman DC and Sandeman RE. (1994) Electrical responses and synaptic connections of giant serotonin-immunoreactive neurons in crayfish olfactory and accessory lobes. J Comp Neurol 341:130–144.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Sandeman DC and Scholtz G. (1995) Ground plans, evolutionary changes and homologies in decapod crustacean brains. In Kutsch W and Breidbach O (Eds.). The nervous systems of invertebrates: a comparative approach(Birkhauser, Basel (Switzerland)) pp. 329–348.
Sandeman DC, Scholtz G, Sandeman RE. (1993) Brain evolution in decapod Crustacea. J Exp Zool 265:112–133.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
Sandeman R, Clarke D, Sandeman D, Manly M. (1998) Growth-related and antennular amputation-induced changes in the olfactory centers of crayfish brain. J Neurosci 18:6195–6206.
Sandeman R and Sandeman D. (1991) Stages in the development of the embryo of the fresh-water crayfish Cherax destructor. Roux's Arch Dev Biol 200:27–37.[CrossRef]
Sandeman R and Sandeman D. (2000) "Impoverished" and "enriched" living conditions influence the proliferation and survival of neurons in crayfish brain. J Neurobiol 45:215–226.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Sandeman RE, Sandeman DC, Watson AHD. (1990) Substance P antibody reveals homologous neurons with axon terminals among somata in the crayfish and crab brain. J Comp Neurol 294:569–582.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Schachtner J, Schmidt M, Homberg U. (2005) Organization and evolutionary trends of primary olfactory brain centers in Tetraconata (Crustacea + Hexapoda). Arthropod Struct Dev 34:257–299.[CrossRef]
Schmidt M. (1990) Ultrastructure of a possible new type of crustacean cuticular strain receptor in Carcinus maenas (Crustacea, Decapoda). J Morphol 204:335–344.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
Schmidt M. (1997) Continuous neurogenesis in the olfactory brain of adult shore crabs, Carcinus maenas. Brain Res 762:131–143.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Schmidt M. (2001) Neuronal differentiation and long-term survival of newly generated cells in the olfactory midbrain of the adult spiny lobster, Panulirus argus. J Neurobiol 48:181–203.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Schmidt M. (2002a) Adult neurogenesis in the central olfactory pathway of decapod crustaceans. In Wiese K (Ed.). The crustacean nervous system(Springer-Verlag, New York) pp. 433–453.
Schmidt M. (2002b) Identification of neuroblasts that drive adult neurogenesis in the central olfactory pathway of decapod crustaceans. Soc Neurosci Abstr Online Program No. 7.4.
Schmidt M. (2003) Neurogenesis in the central olfactory pathway of adult decapod crustaceans: identification of neuroblasts. Chem Senses 28:–A7.
Schmidt M. (2007) Identification of putative neuroblasts in adult neurogenesis in the olfactory brain of the spiny lobster, Panulirus argus. J Comp Neurol Forthcoming.
Schmidt M and Ache BW. (1992) Antennular projections to the midbrain of the spiny lobster. II. Sensory innervation of the olfactory lobe. J Comp Neurol 318:291–303.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Schmidt M and Ache BW. (1993) Antennular projections to the midbrain of the spiny lobster. III. Central arborizations of motoneurons. J Comp Neurol 336:583–594.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Schmidt M and Ache BW. (1994) Descending neurons with dopamine-like or with substance P/FMRF-like immunoreactivity target the somata of olfactory interneurons in the brain of the spiny lobster, Panulirus argus. Cell Tissue Res 278:337–352.[Web of Science][Medline]
Schmidt M and Ache BW. (1996a) Processing of antennular input in the brain of the spiny lobster, Panulirus argus. I. Non-olfactory chemosensory and mechanosensory pathway of the lateral and median antennular neuropils. J Comp Physiol 178:579–604.
Schmidt M and Ache BW. (1996b) Processing of antennular input in the brain of the spiny lobster, Panulirus argus. II. The olfactory pathway. J Comp Physiol 178:605–628.
Schmidt M and Ache BW. (1997) Immunocytochemical analysis of glomerular regionalization and neuronal diversity in the olfactory deutocerebrum of the spiny lobster. Cell Tissue Res 287:541–563.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Schmidt M and Demuth S. (1998) Neurogenesis in the central olfactory pathway of adult decapod crustaceans. Ann NY Acad Sci 855:277–280.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Schmidt M and Derby CD. (2005) Non-olfactory chemoreceptors in asymmetric setae activate antennular grooming behavior in the Caribbean spiny lobster Panulirus argus. J Exp Biol 208:233–248.
Schmidt M and Gnatzy W. (1984) Are the funnel-canal organs the "campaniform sensilla" of the shore crab, Carcinus maenas (Decapoda, Crustacea)? II. Ultrastructure. Cell Tissue Res 237:81–93.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Schmidt M and Gnatzy W. (1989) Specificity and response characteristics of gustatory sensilla (funnel-canal organs) on the dactyls of the shore crab, Carcinus maenas (Crustacea, Decapoda). J Comp Physiol 166:227–242.
Schmidt M and Harzsch S. (1999) Comparative analysis of neurogenesis in the central olfactory pathway of adult decapod crustaceans by in vivo BrdU labeling. Biol Bull 196:127–136.[Abstract]
Schmidt M, Van Ekeris L, Ache BW. (1992) Antennular projections to the midbrain of the spiny lobster. I. Sensory innervation of the lateral and medial antennular neuropils. J Comp Neurol 318:277–290.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Schmiedel-Jakob I, Anderson PAV, Ache BW. (1989) Whole cell recording from lobster olfactory receptor cells: responses to current and odor stimulation. J Neurophysiol 61:994–1000.
Schmitz B. (1993) Postembryonic development of the crayfish Procambarus clarkii and its tailfan mechanosensory system. In Singh RN (Ed.). Nervous systems, principles of design and function(Wiley Eastern Limited, New Dehli (India)) pp. 69–90.
Scholtz G. (1992) Cell lineage studies in the crayfish Cherax destructor (Crustacea, Decapoda): germ band formation, segmentation, and early neurogenesis. Roux's Arch Dev Biol 202:36–48.[CrossRef]
Scholtz G. (2000) Evolution of the nauplius stage in malacostracan crustaceans. J Zool Syst Evol Res 38:175–187.[CrossRef]
Seri B, Garcia-Verdugo JM, Collado-Morente L, McEwen BS, Alvarez-Buylla A. (2004) Cell types, lineage, and architecture of the germinal zone in the adult dentate gyrus. J Comp Neurol 478:359–378.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Seri B, García-Verdugo JM, McEwen BS, Alvarez-Buylla A. (2001) Astrocytes give rise to new neurons in the adult mammalian hippocampus. J Neurosci 21:7153–7160.
Shabani S, Kamio M, Derby CD. (2006) Chemicals released by injured or disturbed conspecifics mediate defensive behaviors via the aesthetasc pathway in the spiny lobster Panulirus argus. Chem Senses 31:A81–A82.
Sheehy MRJ, Bannister RCA, Wickins JF, Shelton PMJ. (1999) New perspectives on the growth and longevity of the European lobster (Homarus gammarus). Can J Fish Aquat Sci 56:1904–1915.[CrossRef]
Snow PJ. (1973) Ultrastructure of the aesthetasc hairs of the littoral decapod, Paragrapsus gaimardii. Z Zellforsch 138:489–502.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Song C-K, Johnstone LM, Schmidt M, Derby CD, Edwards DH. (2005) Social experience changes neurogenesis in the brain of juvenile crayfish Procambarus clarkii. Soc Neurosci Abstr Online Program No. 754.12.
Spencer M and Linberg KA. (1986) Ultrastructure of aesthetasc innervation and external morphology of the lateral antennule setae of the spiny lobster Panulirus interruptus (Randall). Cell Tissue Res 245:69–80.[Web of Science][Medline]
Stähelin BJ, Marti U, Solioz L, Zimmermann H, Reichen J. (1998) False positive staining in the TUNEL assay to detect apoptosis in liver and intestine is caused by endogenous nucleases and inhibited by diethyl pyrocarbonate. J Clin Pathol Mol Pathol 51:204–208.[Abstract]
Steullet P, Cate HS, Derby CD. (2000) A spatiotemporal wave of turnover and functional maturation of olfactory receptor neurons in the spiny lobster Panulirus argus. J Neurosci 20:3282–3294.
Steullet P, Cate HS, Michel WC, Derby CD. (2000) Functional units of a compound nose: aesthetasc sensilla house similar populations of olfactory receptor neurons on the crustacean antennule. J Comp Neurol 418:270–280.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Stopfer M, Bhagavan S, Smith BH, Laurent G. (1997) Impaired odour discrimination on desynchronization of odour-encoding neural assemblies. Nature 390:70–74.[CrossRef][Medline]
Strausfeld NJ and Nässel DR. (1981) Neuroarchitectures serving compound eyes of crustacea and insects. In Autrum H (Ed.). Vision in invertebrates (Handbook of sensory physiology, Vol. 7/6b(Springer, New York) pp. 1–132.
Sullivan JM and Beltz BS. (2001) Neural pathways connecting the deutocerebrum and lateral protocerebrum in the brains of decapod crustaceans. J Comp Neurol 441:9–22.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Sullivan JM and Beltz BS. (2004) Evolutionary changes in the olfactory projection neuron pathways of eumalacostracan crustaceans. J Comp Neurol 470:25–38.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Sullivan JM and Beltz BS. (2005a) Adult neurogenesis in the central olfactory pathway in the absence of receptor neuron turnover in Libinia emarginata. Eur J Neurosci 22:2397–2405.[Web of Science][Medline]
Sullivan JM and Beltz BS. (2005b) Newborn cells in the adult crayfish brain differentiate into distinct neuronal types. J Neurobiol 65:157–170.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Sullivan JM, Benton JL, Sandeman DC, Beltz BS. (2007) Adult neurogenesis: a common strategy across diverse species. J Comp Neurol 500:574–584.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Sullivan JM, Sandeman DC, Beltz BS. (2005) Characterization of a putative stem/progenitor cell niche in the brain of an adult invertebrate, the crayfish Procambarus clarkii. Soc Neurosci Abstr Online Program No. 366.4.
Tateyama H, Tada T, Hattori H, Murase T, Li WX, Eimoto T. (1998) Effects of prefixation and fixation times on apoptosis detection by in situ end-labeling of fragmented DNA. Arch Pathol Lab Med 122:252–255.[Web of Science][Medline]
Tautz J. (1987a) Interneurons in the tritocerebrum of the crayfish. Brain Res 407:230–239.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Tautz J. (1987b) Water vibrations elicits active antennal movements in the crayfish, Orconectes limosus. Anim Behav 35:748–754.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
Tautz J and Müller-Tautz R. (1983) Antennal neuropile in the brain of the crayfish: morphology of neurons. J Comp Neurol 218:415–425.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Thomas WJ. (1970) The setae of Austropotamobius pallipes (Crustacea: Astacidae). J Zool Lond 160:91–142.
Tiews K. (1954) Die biologischen Grundlagen der Büsumer Garnelenfischerei. Ber Dtsch Wiss Komm Meeresforsch 3:235–269.
Truman JW and Bate M. (1988) Spatial and temporal patterns of neurogenesis in the central nervous system of Drosophila melanogaster. Dev Biol 125:145–157.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Voigt R and Atema J. (1992) Tuning of chemoreceptor cells of the second antenna of the American lobster (Homarus americanus) with a comparison of four of its other chemoreceptor organs. J Comp Physiol 171:673–683.
Wachowiak M and Ache BW. (1994) Morphology and physiology of multiglomerular olfactory projection neurons in the spiny lobster. J Comp Physiol 175:35–48.
Wachowiak M, Denk W, Friedrich RW. (2004) Functional organization of sensory input to the olfactory bulb glomerulus analyzed by two-photon calcium imaging. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:9097–9102.
Wachowiak M, Diebel CE, Ache BW. (1997) Local interneurons define functionally distinct regions within lobster olfactory glomeruli. J Exp Biol 200:989–1001.[Abstract]
Wang JW, Wong AM, Flores J, Vosshall LB, Axel R. (2003) Two-photon calcium imaging reveals an odor-evoked map of activity in the fly brain. Cell 112:271–282.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Wilkens LA, Schmitz B, Herrnkind WF. (1996) Antennal responses to hydrodynamic and tactile stimuli in the spiny lobster Panulirus argus. Biol Bull 191:187–198.[Abstract]
Williamson DI. (1982) Larval morphology and diversity. In Abele LG (Ed.). The biology of Crustacea(Academic Press, New York) Vol. 2: pp. 43–110.
Wilson RI and Mainen ZF. (2006) Early events in olfactory processing. Annu Rev Neurosci 29:163–201.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Yasuda-Kamatani Y and Yasuda A. (2006) Characteristic expression patterns of the allatostatin-like peptide. FMRFamide-related peptide, orcokinin, tachykinin-related peptide, and SIFamide in the olfactory system of crayfish Procambarus clarkii. J Comp Neurol 496:135–147.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Yasuda A, Yasuda-Kamatani Y, Nozaki M, Nakajima T. (2004) Identification of GYRKPPFNGSIFamide (crustacean-SIFamide) in the crayfish Procambarus clarkii by topological mass spectrometry analysis. Gen Comp Endocrinol 135:391–400.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Zacharias D, Williams JLD, Meier T, Reichert H. (1993) Neurogenesis in the insect brain: cellular identification and molecular characterization of brain neuroblasts in the grasshopper embryo. Development 118:941–955.[Abstract]
Zeil J, Sandeman R, Sandeman D. (1985) Tactile localisation: the function of active antennal movements in the crayfish Cherax destructor. J Comp Physiol 157:607–617.[CrossRef]
Zupanc GKH. (1999) Neurogenesis, cell death and regeneration in the adult gymnotiform brain. J Exp Biol 202:1435–1446.[Abstract]
Zupanc GKH. (2001) Adult neurogenesis and neuronal regeneration in the central nervous system of teleost fish. Brain Behav Evol 58:250–275.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Zupanc GKH, Hinsch K, Gage FH. (2005) Proliferation, migration, neuronal differentiation, and long-term survival of new cells in the adult zebrafish brain. J Comp Neurol 488:290–319.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Accepted 9 February 2007
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  M. A. Reidenbach, N. George, and M. A. R. Koehl Antennule morphology and flicking kinematics facilitate odor sampling by the spiny lobster, Panulirus argus J. Exp. Biol., September 1, 2008; 211(17): 2849 - 2858. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||