Chem. Senses 24: 191-199,
1999
© Oxford University Press
Perception of Everyday OdorsCorrelation between Intensity, Familiarity and Strength of Hedonic Judgement
1 Institute of Medical Psychology, University of Munich, Goethestraße 31, D-80336 Munich, Germany. 2 Institute of Psychology, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305, Japan. 3 Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Apartado Postal 70228, 04510 México, D.F., México. 4 National Institute of Bioscience and Human Technology, AIST, MITI, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305, Japan.
Correspondence to be sent to: Hans Distel, Institut für Medizinische Psychologie, University of Munich, Goethestraße 31, D-80366, München, Germany. e-mail: hdistel{at}imp.med.uni-muenchen.de
In this study, 40 Japanese, 44 German and 39 Mexican women were presented with 18 everyday odorants. They were asked to rate them for intensity on a six-point scale from not detectable to very strong, for pleasantness on an 11-point scale from -5, to neutral at 0, to +5, and for familiarity on a six-point scale from completely unknown to extremely familiar. Consistent positive correlations were found between paired rating scores for the three measures, and although they were not particularly strong (rs range, 0.190.60), for most odorants all three correlations were significant. Similar results were obtained whether the data were analyzed on an individual or a national basis. Most notable were the consistent positive correlations between perceived intensity and ratings of familiarity and hedonic strength. It is suggested that the perceived intensity of the odorants depended not only on stimulus concentration but probably also on experience-dependent factors.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Guarneros, T. Hummel, M. Martinez-Gomez, and R. Hudson Mexico City Air Pollution Adversely Affects Olfactory Function and Intranasal Trigeminal Sensitivity Chem Senses, November 1, 2009; 34(9): 819 - 826. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Delplanque, D. Grandjean, C. Chrea, L. Aymard, I. Cayeux, B. Le Calve, M. I. Velazco, K. R. Scherer, and D. Sander Emotional Processing of Odors: Evidence for a Nonlinear Relation between Pleasantness and Familiarity Evaluations Chem Senses, June 1, 2008; 33(5): 469 - 479. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Kobayashi, N. Sakai, T. Kobayakawa, S. Akiyama, H. Toda, and S. Saito Effects of Cognitive Factors on Perceived Odor Intensity in Adaptation/Habituation Processes: from 2 Different Odor Presentation Methods Chem Senses, February 1, 2008; 33(2): 163 - 171. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Plailly, B. Tillmann, and J.-P. Royet The Feeling of Familiarity of Music and Odors: The Same Neural Signature? Cereb Cortex, November 1, 2007; 17(11): 2650 - 2658. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Kobayashi, S. Saito, T. Kobayakawa, Y. Deguchi, and R. M. Costanzo Cross-Cultural Comparison of Data Using the Odor Stick Identification Test for Japanese (OSIT-J) Chem Senses, May 1, 2006; 31(4): 335 - 342. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Saito, S. Ayabe-Kanamura, Y. Takashima, N. Gotow, N. Naito, T. Nozawa, M. Mise, Y. Deguchi, and T. Kobayakawa Development of a Smell Identification Test Using a Novel Stick-Type Odor Presentation Kit Chem Senses, May 1, 2006; 31(4): 379 - 391. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. I Rupp, W. W. Fleischhacker, G. Kemmler, H. Oberbauer, A. W Scholtz, C. Wanko, and H. Hinterhuber Various Bilateral Olfactory Deficits in Male Patients With Schizophrenia Schizophr Bull, January 1, 2005; 31(1): 155 - 165. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. I. RUPP, W. W. FLEISCHHACKER, A. HAUSMANN, D. MAIR, H. HINTERHUBER, and M. KURZ OLFACTORY FUNCTIONING IN PATIENTS WITH ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE: IMPAIRMENTS IN ODOR JUDGEMENTS Alcohol Alcohol., November 1, 2004; 39(6): 514 - 519. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-P. Royet and J. Plailly Lateralization of Olfactory Processes Chem Senses, October 1, 2004; 29(8): 731 - 745. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Hudry, S. Thobois, E. Broussolle, P. Adeleine, and J.-P. Royet Evidence for Deficiencies in Perceptual and Semantic Olfactory Processes in Parkinson's Disease Chem Senses, July 1, 2003; 28(6): 537 - 543. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Bensafi, C. Rouby, V. Farget, B. Bertrand, M. Vigouroux, and A. Holley Autonomic Nervous System Responses to Odours: the Role of Pleasantness and Arousal Chem Senses, October 1, 2002; 27(8): 703 - 709. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Hudry, M. Saoud, T. d'Amato, J. Dalery, and J.-P. Royet Ratings of Different Olfactory Judgements in Schizophrenia Chem Senses, June 1, 2002; 27(5): 407 - 416. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Distel and R. Hudson Judgement of Odor Intensity is Influenced by Subjects' Knowledge of the Odor Source Chem Senses, April 1, 2001; 26(3): 247 - 251. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Savic and H. Berglund Right-nostril Dominance in Discrimination of Unfamiliar, but Not Familiar, Odours Chem Senses, October 1, 2000; 25(5): 517 - 523. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||



