Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Getz, W. M.
Right arrow Articles by Lánsky, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Getz, W. M.
Right arrow Articles by Lánsky, P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Chem. Senses 26: 95-104, 2001
© Oxford University Press 2001

Receptor Dissociation Constants and the Information Entropy of Membranes Coding Ligand Concentration

Wayne M. Getz and Petr Lánsky1

Division of Insect Biology, Department of ESPM, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-3112, USA and 1 Institute of Physiology, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Videnská 1083, CZ-142 20, Prague 4, Czech Republic

Correspondence to be sent to W. Getz, Division of Insect Biology, Department of ESPM, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-3112, USA. e-mail getz{at}nature.berkeley.edu

The binding of ligands to receptor proteins embedded in cell membranes drives cellular responses that involve either second messenger cascades or directly gated ion channels. It is known that a single class of receptor proteins expresses ~98% of its graded response to ligand concentrations over four orders of magnitude, where the response is measured by the equilibrium proportion of bound ligand–receptor complexes. This four-decadic concentration range is centered on a logarithmic scale around logK, where K is the dissociation constant defined by the ratio of ligand–receptor unbinding (k) to binding (k+) rates. Remarkably, this four-decadic concentration range is intrinsic to all homogeneous ligand–receptor (or, equivalently, enzyme–substrate) systems. Thus, adapting the sensitivity of cell membranes to narrower or wider ranges of ligand concentrations, respectively, requires multivalent receptors or heterogeneous populations of receptors. Here we use a normalized Shannon–Weaver measure of information entropy to represent the efficiency of coding over given concentrations for membranes containing a population of univalent receptors with a specified distribution of dissociation constants, or a homogeneous population of strongly cooperative multivalent receptors. Assuming a specified level of resolution in the response of cellular or neural systems downstream from the membrane that ‘read’ the ligand concentration ‘code’, we calculate the range of concentrations over which the coding efficiency of the membrane itself is maximized. Our results can be used to hypothesize the number of receptor types associated with the membranes of particular cells. For example, from data in the literature, we conclude that the response of most general olfactory sensory neurons can be explained in terms of a homogeneous population of receptor proteins, while the response of pheromone sensory neurons is satisfactorily explained by the presence of two types of membrane receptor protein with pheromone-binding dissociation constants that have values at least one to two orders of magnitude apart.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Chem SensesHome page
G. A. Wright and B. H. Smith
Different Thresholds for Detection and Discrimination of Odors in the Honey bee (Apis mellifera)
Chem Senses, February 1, 2004; 29(2): 127 - 135.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.