Chem. Senses 26: 499-505,
2001
© Oxford University Press 2001
Neural Networks Distinguish between Taste Qualities Based on Receptor Cell Population Responses
1 Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology and 2 Department of Computer Science, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523 and 3 Rocky Mountain Taste and Smell Center, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver, CO 80262, USA
Correspondence to be sent to: Sue C. Kinnamon, Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA. e-mail: sckinna{at}lamar.colostate.edu
Response features of taste receptor cell action potentials were examined using an artificial neural network to determine whether they contain information about taste quality. Using the loose patch technique to record from hamster taste buds in vivo we recorded population responses of single fungiform papillae to NaCl (100 mM), sucrose (200 mM) and the synthetic sweetener NC-00274-01 (NC-01) (200 µM). Features of each response describing both burst and inter-burst characteristics were then presented to an artificial neural network for pairwise classification of taste stimuli. Responses to NaCl could be distinguished from those to both NC-01 and sucrose with accuracies of up to 86%. In contrast, pairwise comparisons between sucrose and NC-01 were not successful, scoring at chance (50%). Also, comparisons between two different concentrations of NaCl, 0.01 and 0.005 M, scored at chance. Pairwise comparisons using only those features that relate to the inter-burst behavior of the response (i.e. bursting rate) did not hinder the performance of the neural network as both sweeteners versus NaCl received scores of 75–85%. Comparisons using features corresponding to each individual burst scored poorly, receiving scores only slightly above chance. We then compared the sweeteners with varying concentrations of NaCl (0.1, 0.01, 0.005 and 0.001 M) using only those features corresponding to bursting rate within a 1 s time window. The neural network was capable of distinguishing between NaCl and NC-01 at all concentrations tested; while comparisons between NaCl and sucrose received high scores at all concentrations except 0.001 M. These results show that two different taste qualities can be distinguished from each other based solely on the bursting rates of action potentials in single taste buds and that this distinction is independent of stimulation intensity down to 0.001 M NaCl. These data suggest that action potentials in taste receptor cells may play a role in taste quality coding.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  A. Bigiani and V. Cuoghi Localization of Amiloride-Sensitive Sodium Current and Voltage-Gated Calcium Currents in Rat Fungiform Taste Cells J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2007; 98(4): 2483 - 2487. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. I. Glendinning, A. Davis, and M. Rai Temporal coding mediates discrimination of "bitter" taste stimuli by an insect. J. Neurosci., August 30, 2006; 26(35): 8900 - 8908. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 L. Huang, J. Cao, H. Wang, L. A. Vo, and J. G. Brand Identification and Functional Characterization of a Voltage-gated Chloride Channel and Its Novel Splice Variant in Taste Bud Cells J. Biol. Chem., October 28, 2005; 280(43): 36150 - 36157. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 V. Ghiaroni, M. Sasaki, H. Fuwa, G. P. Rossini, G. Scalera, T. Yasumoto, P. Pietra, and A. Bigiani Inhibition of Voltage-Gated Potassium Currents by Gambierol in Mouse Taste Cells Toxicol. Sci., May 1, 2005; 85(1): 657 - 665. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 V. Ghiaroni, F. Fieni, P. Pietra, and A. Bigiani Electrophysiological Heterogeneity in a Functional Subset of Mouse Taste Cells during Postnatal Development Chem Senses, November 1, 2003; 28(9): 827 - 833. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. I. Glendinning, A. Davis, and S. Ramaswamy Contribution of Different Taste Cells and Signaling Pathways to the Discrimination of "Bitter" Taste Stimuli by an Insect J. Neurosci., August 15, 2002; 22(16): 7281 - 7287. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|