Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (10)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sulmont, C.
Right arrow Articles by Köster, E.P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sulmont, C.
Right arrow Articles by Köster, E.P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Chem. Senses 27: 307-317, 2002
© Oxford University Press 2002

Selection of Odorants for Memory Tests on the Basis of Familiarity, Perceived Complexity, Pleasantness, Similarity and Identification

Claire Sulmont, Sylvie Issanchou and E.P. Köster1

INRA, Unité Mixte de Recherches sur les Arômes, 17 Rue Sully, BP 86510, 21065 Dijon Cedex, France 1 Jan Van Scorelstraat 55, 3583 CK Utrecht, The Netherlands

Correspondence to be sent to: Sylvie Issanchou, Unité Mixte de Recherches sur les Arômes, INRA, 17 Rue Sully, BP 86510, 21065 Dijon Cedex, France. e-mail: issan{at}arome.dijon.inra.fr

In a procedure for the selection of two equivalent sets of familiar and two equivalent sets of unfamiliar odours for use in odour memory studies, 24 naïve subjects were first asked to rate the familiarity, perceived complexity and pleasantness of 54 a priori unfamiliar odours and 57 a priori familiar odours and to identify the latter. After selection of the 40 most familiar and the 40 least familiar odours, the subjects sorted each of these two sets into groups of similar odours. Their results were analysed by multidimensional scaling and cluster analysis and each set was divided into two recognition sets that had the same degree of similarity between target and distractor odours and that had similar values of familiarity, pleasantness, perceived complexity (familiar and unfamiliar sets) and identifiability (familiar sets). Finally, recognition tasks were performed in order to check the equivalence in memory performance of both the two familiar and the two unfamiliar recognition sets.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Chem SensesHome page
S. Delplanque, D. Grandjean, C. Chrea, L. Aymard, I. Cayeux, B. Le Calve, M. I. Velazco, K. R. Scherer, and D. Sander
Emotional Processing of Odors: Evidence for a Nonlinear Relation between Pleasantness and Familiarity Evaluations
Chem Senses, June 1, 2008; 33(5): 469 - 479.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Chem SensesHome page
V. Chen and B. P. Halpern
Retronasal but Not Oral-Cavity-Only Identification of "Purely Olfactory" Odorants
Chem Senses, February 1, 2008; 33(2): 107 - 118.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
J. Plailly, B. Tillmann, and J.-P. Royet
The Feeling of Familiarity of Music and Odors: The Same Neural Signature?
Cereb Cortex, November 1, 2007; 17(11): 2650 - 2658.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Chem SensesHome page
C. Sulmont-Rosse, S. Issanchou, and E.P. Koster
Odor Naming Methodology: Correct Identification with Multiple-choice versus Repeatable Identification in a Free Task
Chem Senses, January 1, 2005; 30(1): 23 - 27.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.