Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Walker, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Niu, X.-F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Walker, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Niu, X.-F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Chem. Senses 28: 817-826, 2003
© Oxford University Press 2003

Human Odor Detectability: New Methodology Used to Determine Threshold and Variation

James C. Walker1, Sandra B. Hall2, Dianne B. Walker1, Martin S. Kendal-Reed1, Alison F. Hood1 and Xu-Feng Niu2

1 Sensory Research Institute, Florida State University, 1800 E. Paul Dirac Drive, Tallahassee, FL 32306-2741 USA 2 Department of Statistics, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306-4330, USA

Correspondence to be sent to: James Walker, Sensory Research Institute, Florida State University, 1800 E. Paul Dirac Drive, B-340 NHMFL, Tallahassee, FL 32306-2741, USA. e-mail: jwalker@psy.fsu.edu

Current ambiguity concerning the related issues of optimal means for measurement of odor sensitivity and the functional properties of the olfactory system hinders progress in basic and applied research on the human sense of smell. To address these needs, we selected n-amyl acetate (nAA) as a test odorant and developed a methodology in which participants (Ps) receive multiple presentations each session of several concentrations. Yes–no responses as to whether odor was detected are analyzed using binomial statistics, with the probability that a given proportion of yes responses (or greater) would occur by chance alone being treated as the inverse of detectability. Over the course of multiple sessions, this information is also used to maximize the collection of data in the peri-threshold region. Surprisingly, data collected over as many as 14 sessions were fit well by a single logistic regression model relating probability and concentration. Threshold concentrations, defined as those corresponding to a probability of 0.05, varied from 7.11 to 167.53 p.p.b. (v/v) for 11 Ps. Our approach and findings, if shown to be representative of other combinations of Ps and odorants, could accelerate the pace of research in human olfaction by providing a comprehensive operational definition of the limit of the olfactory system to detect odorant molecules.

Key words: acetate, amyl, human, olfactory, psychophysics, sensitivity


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J R Soc InterfaceHome page
D. J. Taylor, D. J. Doorly, and R. C. Schroter
Inflow boundary profile prescription for numerical simulation of nasal airflow
J R Soc Interface, September 9, 2009; (2009) rsif.2009.0306v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
A. Koulakov, A. Gelperin, and D. Rinberg
Olfactory Coding With All-or-Nothing Glomeruli
J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2007; 98(6): 3134 - 3142.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN OCCUP HYGHome page
S. H. Gaffney and D. J. Paustenbach
A Proposed Approach for Setting Occupational Exposure Limits for Sensory Irritants Based on Chemosensory Models
Ann. Hyg., June 30, 2007; (2007) mem019v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.