Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (8)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Livermore, A.
Right arrow Articles by Hummel, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Livermore, A.
Right arrow Articles by Hummel, T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Chem. Senses 29: 41-51, 2004
© Oxford University Press 2004

The Influence of Training on Chemosensory Event-related Potentials and Interactions between the Olfactory and Trigeminal Systems

Andrew Livermore1,2 and Thomas Hummel3

1 School of Social Sciences and Liberal Studies, Charles Sturt University, Bathurst, NSW 2790, Australia 3 Smell and Taste Clinic, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Dresden Medical School, Fetscherstrasse 74, 01307 Dresden, Germany

2 Present address: Sensory Research, WSA, Philip Morris USA, OC-T3WN, POB 26603, Richmond, VA 23261, USA

Correspondence to be sent to: Thomas Hummel, Smell & Taste Clinic, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Dresden Medical School, Fetscherstrasse 74, 01307 Dresden, Germany. e–mail: thummel{at}rcs.urz.tu–dresden.de

It is not possible to accurately predict the perceptual response to odorants and odorant mixtures without understanding patterns of suppression and facilitation that result from interactions between the olfactory and trigeminal systems. The current study extends previous findings by exploring the effect of intensive training on the interaction between these systems and also by using a different mixed chemosensory stimulus to examine whether the principles established in earlier studies generalize to different odorants. Stimuli were chosen so as to selectively activate the olfactory (H2S) and trigeminal (CO2) nerves. In addition, linalool was included as a stimulus that activated both systems. Thirty-five participants (19 men, 16 women) rated the intensity of each stimulus when presented both alone and in binary mixtures (linalool + H2S, and linalool + CO2). Chemosensory event-related potentials were obtained from three recording positions. Analysis of intensity ratings showed that linalool was significantly less intense than the other stimuli when presented alone. In binary mixtures, H2S was strongly suppressed by linalool. One week of intensive odor training produced significant and specific reductions in the intensity of linalool and H2S, both alone and in their mixture. Training with a different odor (champignol) had no effect. Chemosensory event-related potential data confirmed previous findings showing changes in topographical distribution that reflected the degree of trigeminal activity. Binary mixtures generally produced larger amplitudes than single stimuli. Latencies clearly differentiated between the three single stimuli and the binary mixtures. Changes were observed in event-related potentials that reflected those obtained for intensity ratings in that they were observed for linalool and H2S in the linalool trained group only. The amplitude of the late ‘endogenous’ component (P3) was significantly decreased for these odors at frontal recording sites. In summary, strong and specific training effects were observed in intensity ratings for participants trained with the test odor (linalool), but not for those trained with a different odor. This was supported by a significant decrease of amplitudes of the event-related potentials at frontal recording sites following training with the test odor only

Key words: chemosensory event-related potential, mixtures, olfaction, olfactory event-related potential, olfactory nerve, training, trigeminal nerve


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
J. Frasnelli, B. Schuster, and T. Hummel
Interactions between Olfaction and the Trigeminal System: What Can Be Learned from Olfactory Loss
Cereb Cortex, October 1, 2007; 17(10): 2268 - 2275.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Chem SensesHome page
J. Frasnelli, S. van Ruth, I. Kriukova, and T. Hummel
Intranasal Concentrations of Orally Administered Flavors
Chem Senses, September 1, 2005; 30(7): 575 - 582.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Chem SensesHome page
T. Hummel, H. Guel, and W. Delank
Olfactory Sensitivity of Subjects Working in Odorous Environments
Chem Senses, July 1, 2004; 29(6): 533 - 536.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.