Skip Navigation

Chemical Senses 2005 30(1):89-103; doi:10.1093/chemse/bji004
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lugaz, O.
Right arrow Articles by Faurion, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lugaz, O.
Right arrow Articles by Faurion, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Chemical Senses vol. 30 no. 1 © Oxford University Press 2005; all rights reserved.

Time–Intensity Evaluation of Acid Taste in Subjects with Saliva High Flow and Low Flow Rates for Acids of Various Chemical Properties

O. Lugaz1, A.-M. Pillias1, N. Boireau-Ducept2 and A. Faurion1

1 Laboratoire de Neurobiologie Sensorielle, Unité Neurobiologie de l'Olfaction et de la Prise Alimentaire, INRA, Domaine de Vilvert, Bât. 325, 78352 Jouy en Josas, France and 2 Danone Vitapole, RD 128, 91767 Palaiseau cedex, France

Correspondence to be sent to: Olivia Lugaz, Laboratoire de Neurobiologie Sensorielle, Neurobiologie de l'Olfaction et de la Prise Alimentaire, INRA, Domaine de Vilvert Bât. 325, 78352 Jouy en Josas, France. e-mail: lugaz{at}ccr.jussieu.fr

The role of the chemical properties of sour stimuli and the role of the human saliva flow rate on acid perception were investigated in 11 high saliva flow rate (HF) and 11 low saliva flow rate (LF) subjects with a continuous stimulus delivery flow rate of 3.2 ml/min and using the time–intensity technique for perception recording. Continuously measuring the pH on the tongue surface on three HF and three LF subjects showed that HF subjects' saliva decreased the acidity of the acid solution more efficiently than the LF subjects' saliva did. However, HF subjects exhibited higher perceived intensity for acid solutions than LF subjects. At equal pH, the order of the efficiency of acids indicated that HCl was the least efficient acid stimulus and acetic acid the most efficient. At equal concentration, the order of efficiency was the opposite (citric acid > malic acid > lactic acid > acetic acid), indicating that titratable acidity rather than pH has to be considered when comparing weak acids. At high concentrations, the ratio of relative efficiency is more in favor of the hydrophobic than the hydrophilic acid in HF subjects compared with LF subjects, i.e. HF subjects are more sensitive to hydrophobic stimuli. Hydrophobic molecules may diffuse more easily into the epithelium of HF than LF subjects, and reach more efficiently trigeminal nerve endings in addition to taste receptor cells.

Key words: acids, human, lingual pH, saliva, time–intensity


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Chem SensesHome page
P. M. Wise, J. L. Hansen, D. R. Reed, and P. A.S. Breslin
Twin Study of the Heritability of Recognition Thresholds for Sour and Salty Taste
Chem Senses, October 1, 2007; 32(8): 749 - 754.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Space and CultureHome page
I. Cook and M. Harrison
Follow the Thing: "West Indian Hot Pepper Sauce"
Space and Culture, February 1, 2007; 10(1): 40 - 63.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
F. J. Gallardo-Escamilla, A. L. Kelly, and C. M. Delahunty
Influence of Starter Culture on Flavor and Headspace Volatile Profiles of Fermented Whey and Whey Produced from Fermented Milk
J Dairy Sci, November 1, 2005; 88(11): 3745 - 3753.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.