Skip Navigation


Chemical Senses Advance Access originally published online on July 27, 2005
Chemical Senses 2005 30(7):539-545; doi:10.1093/chemse/bji047
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
30/7/539    most recent
bji047v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pfeiffer, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, A. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pfeiffer, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, A. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oupjournals.org

Temporal Synchrony and Integration of Sub-threshold Taste and Smell Signals

Johann C. Pfeiffer, Tracey A. Hollowood, Joanne Hort* and Andrew J. Taylor

Samworth Flavour Laboratory, Division of Food Sciences, The University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington Campus, Loughborough LE12 5RD, UK

* Correspondence to be sent to: Joanne Hort, Division of Food Sciences, The University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington Campus, Loughborough LE12 5RD, UK. e-mail: joanne.hort{at}nottingham.ac.uk

The importance of stimulus timing and location on the perceptual integration of taste and odour was studied based on a sub-threshold methodology. From a panel of 16 people, 12 showed the integration effect previously reported while 4 showed no effect. The experiment was repeated using retronasal and orthonasal delivery of the odour and with tastant present or absent in the mouth. Integration of taste and odour only occurred when both stimuli were present at the same time. Retro- or orthonasal presentation both produced integration providing that tastant delivery was synchronous but the threshold values for the two presentation methods were different. The relevance of these findings to flavour perception under realistic conditions is considered.

Key words: cross-modal integration, flavour intensity, sensory perception, smell, taste


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Chem SensesHome page
D Labbe, A Rytz, C Morgenegg, S Ali, and N Martin
Subthreshold Olfactory Stimulation Can Enhance Sweetness
Chem Senses, April 2, 2007; (2007) bjl040v2.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.