Skip Navigation



Chemical Senses Advance Access published online on October 12, 2005
Chemical Senses, doi:10.1093/chemse/bji067
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
30/9/755    most recent
bji067v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Laska, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Laska, M.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org
Accepted September 20, 2005

Article

Olfactory Discrimination Ability for Aliphatic C6 Alcohols as a Function of Presence, Position, and Configuration of a Double Bond

Matthias Laska 1*

1 Institut für Medizinische Psychologie, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Goethestr. 31, D-80336 München, Germany

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Matthias Laska, E-mail: matthias.laska{at}med.uni-muenchen.de


  Abstract

The ability of human subjects to distinguish between aliphatic C6 alcohols differing in presence, position, or configuration (i.e., cis-trans geometry) of a double bond was tested. In a forced-choice triangular test procedure, 20 subjects were repeatedly presented with all 21 binary combinations of the seven stimuli and asked to identify the bottle containing the odd stimulus. I found (a) that as a group, the subjects performed significantly above chance level in all tasks but two and thus were clearly able to discriminate between most of the odor pairs presented; (b) marked interindividual differences in discrimination performance, ranging from subjects who were able to significantly distinguish between all 21 odor pairs to subjects who failed to do so with 10 of the tasks; (c) that odor pairs involving two hexenols were significantly more difficult to discriminate than odor pairs that involved hexanol and one of the hexenols; (d) that odor pairs involving hexenols sharing the same geometry but differing in the position of the double bond by only one carbon atom were significantly more difficult to distinguish than odor pairs that involved hexenols differing by two carbon atoms; (e) that odor pairs involving 4-hexenols were significantly easier to discriminate than 3-hexenols, which, in turn, were significantly easier to distinguish than 2-hexenols; and (f) that odor pairs involving two cis-hexenols were significantly more difficult to discriminate than odor pairs that involved two trans-hexenols. These findings demonstrate that the presence as well as the position and configuration of a double bond affected discriminability in a systematic manner and suggest that these molecular structural features may be important determinants of the interaction between stimulus molecule and olfactory receptor and thus may affect odor quality of aliphatic alcohols.

Keywords: aliphatic alcohols; discrimination ability; double bond; humans; odor structure-activity relationships; olfaction.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.