Skip Navigation



Chemical Senses Advance Access published online on April 13, 2006
Chemical Senses, doi:10.1093/chemse/bjj054
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
31/6/515    most recent
bjj054v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Guest, S.
Right arrow Articles by Essick, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Guest, S.
Right arrow Articles by Essick, G.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org
Accepted March 22, 2006

Article

Validation of a Handheld Display Device for an Expandable Labeled Magnitude Scale (LMS)

Steve Guest 1 *, McSherry Wells 2, Chris Dancer 3, and Greg Essick 1

1 Center for Neurosensory Disorders, School of Dentistry, 2160 Old Dental Building, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, North Carolina, NC 27599-7450, USA
2 Center for Neurosensory Disorders, School of Dentistry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, North Carolina, NC 27599-7450, USA
3 Dancer Design, 123 Boundary Road, St Helens, UK

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Steve Guest, E-mail: steve_guest{at}dentistry.unc.edu


  Abstract

Palmtop computers provide a possible avenue for the convenient collection of subjective ratings from individuals outside of a fixed laboratory setting. One disadvantage of these computers is the small size of their display screens, which may reduce the resolution of responses available as compared with standard display screens. One plausible solution to this problem is to use a scale that expands contingent on an initial response made by the subject, so that the final response is made from a scale with finer resolution. To validate this approach, we compared taste intensity judgments of six sucrose solutions (0.03, 0.06, 0.12, 0.24, 0.48, and 0.96 M), using a labeled magnitude scale either presented in expandable form on a palmtop computer (Palm scale) or in conventional (nonexpandable) form on a standard 17'' PC monitor (PC scale). Twenty-four subjects rated all six sucrose solutions thrice, using both scale types, the different scales being used on different days of testing. The scales led to very similar taste intensity ratings at all but the lowest concentration, which was rated less intense on the Palm scale. The Palm scale was used with slightly less precision than the PC scale for the weakest solution concentrations. In summary, the responses of the two scales were similar enough to validate the use of the expandable scale on the palmtop computer outside the laboratory setting.

Keywords: labeled magnitude scale; palmtop computer; scale validation; taste.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.