Chemical Senses Advance Access published online on July 14, 2006
Chemical Senses, doi:10.1093/chemse/bjl012
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montreal, Canada; Department of Psychology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Investigating the neural substrates of perceived quality in olfaction using different odorants is intrinsically difficult. By utilizing individual differences in perceived quality of the odor of androstenone, we obtained a continuum of individual differences in rated valence of the same stimulus allowing investigations of its manifestation in the olfactory event-related potentials (ERPs). In an initial group consisting of 43 individuals that were screened for their verbal descriptors and sensitivity for the odor of androstenone, 22 normosmic volunteers were chosen forming 2 distinct groups with regard to verbal labels ("body odor" and "nonbody odor") for androstenone while maintaining chemical structure, concentration, and intensity constant. In the main experiment, these participants rated both intensity and pleasantness of androstenone during the recording of olfactory ERPs. There was a significant difference in rated valence between the groups but not in intensity. Participants in the body odor label group had larger amplitudes of the late positive ERP component than those in the nonbody odor label group. A negative correlation between valence and amplitudes of the late positive component for androstenone indicated that these differences were mediated by the difference in odor valence between the 2 groups. This was further supported by a comparison of ERP peaks in response to stimulation with androstenone and the invariably unpleasant hydrogen sulfide that had been used as a control. Altogether, the results suggest that the late positive component reflects the processing of odor valence. Future olfactory studies with the aim of assessing the dimension of pleasantness would benefit from the use of these interindividual differences in the perception of a specific odor.
Accepted June 22, 2006
Article
Olfactory Event-Related Potentials Reflect Individual Differences in Odor Valence Perception
Johan N. Lundström 1,
Suzi Seven 2,
Mats J. Olsson 3,
Benoist Schaal 4,
and
Thomas Hummel 5 *
2 Department of Psychology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden; Smell and Taste Clinic, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Dresden Medical School (Technische Universität Dresden), Fetscherstrasse 74, 01307 Dresden, Germany
3 Department of Psychology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
4 Centre des Sciences du Goût, CNRS-Université de Bourgogne, Dijon, France
5 Smell and Taste Clinic, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Dresden Medical School (Technische Universität Dresden), Fetscherstrasse 74, 01307 Dresden, Germany
Thomas Hummel, E-mail: thummel{at}rcs.urz.tu-dresden.de
Abstract 
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  J. Djordjevic, J. N. Lundstrom, F. Clement, J. A. Boyle, S. Pouliot, and M. Jones-Gotman A Rose by Any Other Name: Would it Smell as Sweet? J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2008; 99(1): 386 - 393. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|