Chemical Senses Advance Access published online on August 10, 2006
Chemical Senses, doi:10.1093/chemse/bjl020
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Laboratory of Cellular Neurobiology, School of Life Sciences, Tokyo University of Pharmacy and Life Science, Hachioji, Tokyo, 192-0392, Japan
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Glycine is an amino acid tasting sweet to humans. In 2-bottle tests, C57BL/6ByJ (B6) mice strongly prefer glycine solutions, whereas 129P3/J (129) mice do not, suggesting that they differ in perception of glycine taste. We examined this question using the conditioned taste aversion (CTA) generalization technique. CTA was achieved by injecting LiCl after drinking glycine, and next its generalization to 10 taste solutions (glycine, sucrose, saccharin, D-tryptophan, L-tryptophan, L-alanine, L-proline, L-glutamine, NaCl, and HCl) was examined by video recording licking behavior. Both B6 and 129 mice generalized the aversion to sucrose, saccharin, L-alanine, and L-proline and did not generalize it to NaCl, HCl, and L-tryptophan. This indicates that both B6 and 129 mice perceive the sweetness (i.e., a sucrose-like taste) of glycine. Thus, the lack of a glycine preference by 129 mice cannot be explained by their inability to perceive its sweetness. Strain differences were observed for CTA generalization to 2 amino acids: 129 mice generalized aversion to L-glutamine but not D-tryptophan, whereas B6 mice generalized it to D-tryptophan but not L-glutamine. 129.B6-Tas1r3 congenic mice with 2 genotypes of the Tas1r3 locus (B6/129 heterozygotes and 129/129 homozygotes) did not differ in aversion generalization, suggesting that the differences between 129 and B6 strains are not attributed to the Tas1r3 allelic variants and that other, yet unknown, genes are involved in taste perception of amino acids.
Accepted July 19, 2006
Article
Is Glycine "Sweet" to Mice? Mouse Strain Differences in Perception of Glycine Taste
Satoshi Manita 1, Alexander A. Bachmanov 2, Xia Li 2, Gary K. Beauchamp 3, and Masashi Inoue 4 *
2 Monell Chemical Senses Center, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
3 Monell Chemical Senses Center, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Department of Psychology and School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
4 Laboratory of Cellular Neurobiology, School of Life Sciences, Tokyo University of Pharmacy and Life Science, Hachioji, Tokyo, 192-0392, Japan; Monell Chemical Senses Center, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
Masashi Inoue, E-mail: inou{at}ls.toyaku.ac.jp
![]()
Abstract ![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E. Jiang, G. Blonde, M. Garcea, and A. C. Spector Greater Superficial Petrosal Nerve Transection in Rats does not Change Unconditioned Licking Responses to Putatively Sweet Taste Stimuli Chem Senses, October 1, 2008; 33(8): 709 - 723. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Hacker, A. Laskowski, L. Feng, D. Restrepo, and K. Medler Evidence for Two Populations of Bitter Responsive Taste Cells in Mice J Neurophysiol, March 1, 2008; 99(3): 1503 - 1514. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Ji and A. A. Bachmanov Differences in postingestive metabolism of glutamate and glycine between C57BL/6ByJ and 129P3/J mice Physiol Genomics, November 14, 2007; 31(3): 475 - 482. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. A. McCaughey Taste-Evoked Responses to Sweeteners in the Nucleus of the Solitary Tract Differ between C57BL/6ByJ and 129P3/J Mice J. Neurosci., January 3, 2007; 27(1): 35 - 45. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||



