Skip Navigation


Chemical Senses Advance Access first published online on May 28, 2009
This version published online on June 5, 2009
Chemical Senses, doi:10.1093/chemse/bjp030
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
34/6/529    most recent
bjp030v2
bjp030v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mast, T. G.
Right arrow Articles by Samuelsen, C. L.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mast, T. G.
Right arrow Articles by Samuelsen, C. L.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Human Pheromone Detection by the Vomeronasal Organ: Unnecessary for Mate Selection?

Thomas G. Mast and Chad L. Samuelsen

Department of Biological Sciences, Program in Neuroscience, The Florida State University, 319 Stadium Dr. (Kin), Tallahassee, FL 32306-4295, USA

Correspondence to be sent to: Thomas Mast, Department of Biological Sciences, Program in Neuroscience, The Florida State University, 319 Stadium Dr. (Kin), Tallahassee, FL 32306-4295, USA. e-mail: mast{at}neuro.fsu.edu


  Abstract

Recently, Foltan and Sedy proposed a hypothesis stating that the adult human VNO is integral to the prevention of inappropriate mate selection. In this commentary, we address the authors’ assumption that humans have a functional VNO, that pheromones are detected exclusively by the VNO, and that human pheromones are responsible for negative stimuli during mate selection. After examining the published literature on human vomeronasal function, we argue that their hypothesis is critically flawed. We offer a brief review of the adult human VNO in support of our argument.

Key words: behavior, human, pheromone, vomeronasal

The original published version of this paper was incorrect. The first author's middle initial was listed as E but should be G.

Accepted 6 May 2009


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.